The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Incu mixer mp

Manufactured by Benchmark Scientific

The Incu-Mixer™ MP is a compact, microprocessor-controlled device designed for incubation and mixing of biological samples. It features a temperature-controlled incubation chamber and a built-in rotator for gentle agitation of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using incu mixer mp

1

Antimicrobial Activity of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MIC was determined by microbroth dilution method as described. Briefly, bacterial cells (0.5 McFarland turbidity) were mixed with nanomaterials (ZO, 2NZO, and 5NZO) varying from 10 to 250 μg mL−1 range in a 96-well microplate. The resulting mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 16 h with 500 rpm shaking using Incu-Mixer™ MP (Benchmark Scientific). The nanomaterial concentration that completely inhibit the bacterial growth was defined as MIC value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hypoxic Condition for Red Blood Cell Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SS
blood samples were diluted 1:1000 with a modified HEMOX solution,
pH 7.4, containing N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic
acid (30 mM), sodium chloride (135 mM), potassium chloride (5 mM),
calcium chloride (0.9 mM), magnesium chloride (0.5 mM), iron(II) chloride
(9 μM), and glucose (5 mM) in water. Diluted SS blood (20 μL/well)
was aliquoted into 384-well plates (CellCarrier 384-well Ultra microplates,
PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA).
Assay plates, a plate shaker (Incu-Mixer
MP, Benchmark Scientific, Sayreville, NJ), and an oxygen meter (MiniOx
250E, Ohio Medical, Gurnee, IL) were placed in a chamber made of an
inflatable polyethylene bag (AtmosBag, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis,
MO, Figure S2). The chamber was purged
with a mixture of nitrogen (purity 99.9%) and air to maintain a concentration
of oxygen gas of 3.9–4.1%, and the plates were shaken (1000
rpm) within the chamber at 37 °C for 1 h. After incubation, samples
were fixed with 20 μL/well of 2% glutaraldehyde in phosphate
buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA), sealed, and shaken
in the chamber at 37 °C for 15 min. The plates were subsequently
removed from the chamber and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 1 min to
sediment RBCs to the bottom of the plates for the subsequent assessment
of RBC appearance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating ROS Production in E. coli after ZnO Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The production of ROS by E. coli ATCC 25922 after treatment with ZnO nanorods was evaluated based on the previous reports.33 (link) Briefly, the adjusted bacterial culture (0.5 McFarland turbidity) in PBS buffer by Sensititre™ Nephelometer (Thermo Scientific) was treated with different concentrations of nanomaterials corresponding to 0, 125, 200, and 250 μg mL−1 in the presence of 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA) (Sigma-Aldrich) at a final concentration of 30 μM in PBS buffer. The mixtures in 96-well plate were incubated at 37 °C with vigorous shaking (500 rpm) using Incu-Mixer™ MP (Benchmark Scientific) for 45 min. Then, the fluorescence intensity was measured by a FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech) with an excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 and 520 nm, respectively. Untreated bacterial culture was used as a negative control and the background fluorescence of PBS and autofluorescence of the bacterial cells incubated without the probe was measured to calculate the net fluorescence emitted from the assay itself. The data was further analyzed using MARS Data Analysis software (ver. 3.02 R2, BMG Labtech) and the relative ROS production of samples treated with increasing concentrations of NPs was compared to non-NP treated samples from triplicate experiments with p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!