The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistical analysis software version 17

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics is a software application used for statistical analysis. Version 17.0 includes a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, data management, and data documentation. The software provides advanced analytical capabilities and a user-friendly interface for researchers and analysts to effectively manage and interpret data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using spss statistical analysis software version 17

1

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The qRT-PCR assay was performed according to the method described previously (Zhu et al., 2020 (link)). The 16S RNA was used as the internal reference gene (Zhu et al., 2020 (link)). All RT-PCRs were performed using CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). In this study, all tests were performed in triplicate. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical analysis software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Calculating Antibiotic Resistance Index

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using SPSS statistical analysis software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The MARI of the isolates was defined as a/b, where a represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was resistant, and b represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was subjected, and calculated as described previously [6 (link),9 (link),55 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Polymorphisms and NTD Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotype frequency of SNP was tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in cases and controls by the Chi-square test. The indicator of linkage disequilibrium (LD), r2 (square of correlation coefficient), and the haplotype frequencies were analyzed using online SNPstats software at http://bioinfo.iconcologia.net/SNPstats[16] (link). General characteristics of the participants were presented as the mean and standard deviations (SDs) for continuous measures, while frequencies and percentages were used for categorical measures. Association of genetic polymorphisms of ITPK1 gene with NTD risk was analyzed using univariate analysis through Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. The correlation between each SNP and NTDs risk was estimated by logistic regression analysis with adjustment for other variables. MACH [17] (link), [18] (link) was used to impute the un-genotyped SNPs in ITPK1 locus, using the reference panel ASN data (1000 Genomes Integrated Phase 1). Association test was performed by using logistic regression. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS statistical analysis software, version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Association was expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The association was considered to be significant when the P-value was<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical analysis software, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The MARI of an isolate was defined as a/b, where a represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was resistant, while b represents the number of antibiotics for which the isolate was examined [17 (link),38 (link),39 (link),45 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spinal Cord Injury Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of more than three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical analysis software version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Baseline and post-treatment of SCI injury variables were compared by paired Student's t-test. Statistically significant differences between groups were calculated by repeated measures of two-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean of at least three independent preparations. Statistical analysis was conducted by analysis of variance with Tukey's or Scheffé's post hoc tests using SPSS statistical analysis software, version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Differential Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of each gene was calculated using RNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximization (RSEM, http://deweylab.github.io/RSEM/, accessed on 17 October 2021). Genes with the criteria, fold-changes ≥ 2.0 or ≤0.5, and p-values < 0.05 relative to the control were defined as DEGs. These DEGs were used for gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/, accessed on 17 October 2021). Significantly changed GSEA were identified when the enrichment test p-value fell below 0.05 [32 (link)]. All tests were performed in triplicates. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical analysis software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Differential Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DEGs were analyzed as described in our recent reports [15 (link),16 (link),72 (link)]. All tests were carried out in triplicate. The data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical analysis software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using the least-significant difference (LSD) method and homogeneity of variance test. There was no significant difference between the control and the treatment groups if the generalized p-values were more than 0.05; conversely, there was significant difference if p-values were less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA-Seq Analysis of Differential Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of each gene was calculated using the RNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximization (RSEM, http://deweylab.github.io/RSEM/, accessed on 13 October 2022). The criteria for DEGs were the same as described in our precious report [59 (link)]. The DEGs were used for gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/, accessed on 13 October 2022). All the tests were conducted in triplicates. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical analysis software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis in Fish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical analysis software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The multiple antimicrobial resistance index (MARI) of an isolate is defined as a/b, where a represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was resistant, and b represents the number of antibiotics to which the isolate was subjected (Krumperman 1983 (link)). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by appropriate post-hoc test (Tukey) was performed to determine significant differences between the four different fish samples and MARI of resistant isolates, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. DNA banding patterns generated by the ERIC-PCR were analyzed using the BioNumerics 7.6 software (Meacham et al. 2003 (link)). All the PCR fingerprinting profiles were assigned arbitrary designations, and quantitative differences among the profiles were defined using the Dice coefficient. Cluster analysis was carried out based on the unweighted pair group with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) using a position tolerance of 0.5. The single numerical index of discrimination (D) was based on the probability that two unrelated strains sampled from the test population will be placed into different typing groups. This probability can be calculated by Simpson’s index of diversity (Simpson 1972 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!