The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using uc6 microtome

1

Ultrastructural Characterization of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A small sample section (2 mm × 4 mm) was cut and embedded into a flat mold with Polybed 812 (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA), which was then polymerized at 60°C for 24 hours. The sample resin block was sectioned under ambient conditions, using a Leica UC6 microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and DiATOME diamond knives (DiATOME, Hatfield, PA). Ultra-thin sections (70 nm) were examined by JEOL 1200EX II electron microscopy (Jeol, Peabody, MA). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were processed and analyzed using Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD) to quantify average particle diameter (nm) and nearest neighbor distance (nm). The dispersion parameter (D) was quantified using the average particle area (μ) and the standard deviation of the particle area (σ), as shown in Equation 2.24 D=0.22πμσ
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tissue Sample Sectioning for Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A small piece (2 mm × 4 mm) of the sample was cut and embedded in the flat mold with Polybed 812 (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA) and polymerized at 60°C, overnight. The sample resin block was sectioned at room temperature, using Leica UC6 microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and DiATOME diamond knives (DiATOME, Hatfield, PA). Ultra-thin sections (70 nm) were examined by JEOL 1200EX II electron microscopy (Jeol, Peabody, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of miR-200c Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Followed by miR-200c injection, zebrafish larvae were fixed in solution D overnight, washed 3x in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer and postfixed in 1% OsO4 for 1 h. Tissues were once again washed, dehydrated and embedded in EPON (recipe/protocol from EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA). Semi-thin (300 nm) and ultra-thin (90 nm) sections were cut with a Leica UC-6 Microtome (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections obtained were mounted onto formvar-coated Ni slot grids (EMS, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Grids were stained for 30 min in 5% uranyl acetate (Science Services, München, Germany), followed by 0.1% lead citrate (Science Services, München, Germany) for 15 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Optic Nerve and Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymerized flat blocks were trimmed using a 90° diamond trim tool (Diatome, Biel, Switzerland). The arrays of 70 nm sections were obtained using a 35° diamond knife (Diatome, Biel, Switzerland) mounted on Leica UC6 microtome (Leica, Vienna). The orientation for the optic nerves was established perpendicular to its length, a cross-section about 1 mm from the optic nerve head. For sectioning, samples were carefully oriented to obtain a perpendicular plane of the optical nerve. In the case of brain slices, the search was targeted to the corpus callosum based on the overall morphology of the processed slice [70 (link), 71 (link)]. Sections were collected on polyetherimide-coated carbon slot grids.
TEM samples were analyzed with an FEI CM100 electron microscope (Thermo Fischer Scientific) at 80kV, equipped with a TVIPS camera, piloted by the EMTVIPS program. Images were collected either as single frames or stitched mosaic panels to cover more extensive sample regions.
The multiple tile images were stitched with the IMOD software package (Kremer et al, 1996). Data were processed and analyzed using Fiji, IMOD 3dmod, and Photoshop programs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Mapping of Neural Cell Types

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flat embedded samples were mapped using binocular to map the precise region of interest at the basal part of the ventricle. For the ultramicrotome sectioning, samples were carefully oriented inside the holder according to the correlation maps derived from the embedded samples. Polymerized flat blocks were trimmed using a 90° diamond trim tool. The arrays sequential sections of 100 nm were generated using a 35° ATC diamond knife (Diatome, Biel, Switzerland) mounted on Leica UC6 microtome (Leica, Vienna). Arrays that covered the span of the ROI were transferred on pieces of silicon wafer [20 (link)]. Wafers were analyzed using an FEI Helios Nanolab 650 scanning electron microscope (Thermo Fischer, Eindhoven). Wafers were screened to target the relevant sections, and the ventricle area was imaged by tiling multiple images using the following imaging settings: MD detector, accelerating voltage 2 kV, current 0.8 nA, and dwell time 4–6 μs. Subsequently, relevant areas were re-imaged using higher resolution parameters, collected either manually or using the AT module of MAPs program (Thermo Fischer, Eindhoven) [20 (link)]. For electron microscopy data interpretation, previous reports in the literature were used to recognize the different neural cell types based on their ultrastructural characteristics [5 (link),21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Correlative Microscopy Analysis of Wing Blade

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymerized flat blocks were trimmed using 90° diamond trim tool (Diatome, Switzerland) and using 35° diamond knife (Diatome, Switzerland) mounted on Leica UC6 microtome (Leica, Austria), 70 nm sections were collected on formvar-coated slot grids (EMS, USA). For sectioning, samples were carefully oriented to obtain the relevant parts of the wing blade, indispensable for the reliable data interpretation [43 (link), 45 (link)]. TEM samples were analyzed with an FEI CM100 electron microscope operated at 80kV, equipped with TVIPS camera, piloted by EMTVIPS program. Images were collected either as single frames or stitched mosaic panels to cover larger regions of the sample. Data were processed and analyzed using Fiji, IMOD 3dmod and Photoshop programs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrastructural Analysis of Metal-Incubated Nitratiruptor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After metal incubation, Nitratiruptor sp. SB155B cells were collected by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. Fixation was carried out in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 2 h in darkness at room temperature. Then, supernatants were removed and samples were post‐fixed with osmium tetroxide (OsO4) for 1 h. Samples were dehydrated in an ethanol series (70%, 80%, 90%, 95% and 100%) and finally embedded in resin. Fixed samples were cut using a Leica UC6 microtome (Leica, Germany) with a diamond cutter (DiATOME, US) at a thickness of 100 nm. Finally, sections mounted on carbon‐coated nickel grids (Nisshin‐EM, Japan) were examined by STEM with a JEOL ARM‐200F system at 80 Kv with an angular annular dark field detector (30–120 mrad) using HR STEM‐HAADF observation mode. The spot size was 6C for observing and 1C for EDX mapping.
For EDX detection, a JEOL SDD high‐resolution EDX detector (100 mm2 solid angle) was used. Elemental spectra were collected from at least two points per cell and a minimum of 30 cells per treatment. For characterization, total cell composition was mapped in at least at five cells per treatment for 5–15 h. Atomic composition of ratios and distribution were assessed using the software, JED‐2300 Analysis Station.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of CLIC/GEEC Carriers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In transfected CAV1−/− MEFs, HRP uptake (10 µg/ml) was performed at 37°C for 2 min, and after brief washing with DMEM containing 1% BSA, diaminobenzidine (DAB) (10 mg/ml) reaction was performed on the live cell as previously described in [29] (link). Fixation, embedding, and sectioning were performed as follows. MEFs were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). Cells were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at room temperature and serially dehydrated with ethanol. Cells were embedded in increasing ratios of LX-112 resin∶ethanol to 100% resin, and polymerized overnight at 60°C. Ultrathin (60 nm) sections were cut on a Leica UC6 microtome and imaged on a JEOL1011 electron microscope at 80 kV. Quantifications were performed as follows: the perimeters of approximately 16 cells (per experimental condition) were imaged and the number of CLICs/GEEC carriers from each cell was quantified and averaged across all 16 cells. The average number of CLICs/GEEC carriers per cell was generated from two separate repeats of the same experimental conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electron Microscopy of FMDV VLPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The formation of arrays comprised of FMDV VLPs produced using this system had been previously established using immuno-electron microscopy [16 (link)]. For TEM processing, cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, stained en bloc with 2% uranyl acetate, dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol then propylene oxide, and embedded in Spurr’s resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Ultrathin (80 nm) sections were cut on a Leica UC6 microtome, post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and imaged on a Hitachi 7600 TEM with a 2k × 2k AMT camera at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preparation of Semi-Thin Sections from Plant Shoot Tips

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each specimen was prepared as described previously (Lee et al., 2010 (link)). To prepare semi-thin sections, shoot tips were fixed in a solution containing 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS buffer (pH 7.2) under vacuum conditions for 30 min. After fixing for 2 days at 4°C, the shoot tips were rinsed twice with phosphate buffer and then dehydrated at room temperature in a graded series of ethanol starting at 30% then going to 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100% (v/v). The specimens were embedded in Spurr’s low-viscosity embedding medium. Infiltration was started in a 2:1 ethanol/embedding medium. The specimens were left in the mixture with swirling of the container for 2 h after which the medium was replaced with a 1:1 ethanol/embedding medium and left in the container, which was swirled, for 4 h. Next, the medium was replaced with 1:3 ethanol/embedding medium and incubated with swirling of the container for another 6 h. After that, the mixture was drained and embedding medium was added to the container and left overnight. After curing the specimens for 48 h at 65°C, the specimens were mounted and sectioned at a thickness of 1 μm using a UC6 microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). After staining briefly with 0.1% toluidine blue, the sections were observed under bright-field optics using an Axio Imager M2 microscope (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!