The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using gtse1

1

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell extracts were prepared as described previously (Liu et al. 2013 (link)). In brief, equivalent amounts of protein (50 μg) were separated by sodium dodecyl-sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10 %) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The membranes were subsequently incubated with the following primary antibodies: GTSE1 (Proteintech Group, Inc), AKT, phospho-AKT (Ser473), and cyclin B1 from CST (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), BCL-2 and Bax from Abcam (AbCam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and GAPDH (CST) was used as a loading control. The blots were visualized with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Kangchen, Shanghai, China) and an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Millipore, Bedford, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Western Blotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed according to the standard protocol. The primary antibodies, including GTSE1(Proteintech, 21,319–1-AP), Ki67(Proteintech, 27,309–1-AP),mutant p53(Abcam, ab32049), p53(Proteintech, 10,442–1-AP),Cyclin D1(Proteintech, 60,186–1-Ig),Cyclin E1(Proteintech, 11,554–1-AP), p21(Proteintech,60,214–1-Ig), E-Cadherin (Proteintech, 20,874–1-AP), Desmoplakin (Proteintech,25,318–1-AP), N-Cadherin (Proteintech,22,018–1-AP), Vimentin (Proteintech, 10,366–1-AP), Nanog (Proteintech, 14,295–1-AP), ABCG2(CST, 42078S), TAZ (CST, 4883S), YAP (CST, 14074S), ERK1/2(Affinity, AF0155), phospho-ERK1/2(Affinity, AF1015), AKT (CST, 2938S), Phospho-Akt (Thr308) (CST, 13038S), Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (CST, X4060S), FoxC2(CST, 12974S),Slug (CST, 9585 T),Twist1(CST, 46702S),Snail (Proteintech, MG-3879 T) and GAPDH (Proteintech, 60,004–1-Ig) were used at a dilution of 1:1000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of GTSE1 and ITGA2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was carried out on paraffin‐embedded tissue samples using antibodies against GTSE1 (1:400; Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA) and integrin subunit alpha 2 (ITGA2) (1:400; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), followed by a standard avidin‐biotin detection protocol using 3‐amino‐9 ethylcarbazole. Sample staining was independently scored as 0 (negative), 1, 2, or 3 (weak, intermediate, and strong, respectively) by 3 pathologists, based on both the proportion of positively stained tumor cells and their staining intensity. GTSE1 protein expression was classified as high (IHC score of 2 or 3) or low (IHC score of 0 or 1) expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein of cells was extracted with a radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing protease inhibitor under the condition of an ice bath. The extracted protein and loading buffer were added and transferred onto 0.22-mm methanol-excited polyvinylidene fluoride membranes after SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, and then membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk. Next, we incubated membranes with the following primary antibodies at 4°C overnight: TAF15 (1:1,000) (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), MTF1 (1:1,000) (Proteintech, USA), YY2 (1:200) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), GTSE1 (1:1,000) (Proteintech, USA), and GAPDH (1:10,000) (Proteintech, USA), followed by incubation with related horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies, including goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:10,000) (Proteintech, USA) at room temperature for 1.5 h. The relative integrated density values (IDVs) were observed based on GAPDH as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!