The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using epcam clone g8

1

Isolation and Characterization of CAFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolated CAFs and FB were stained for typical markers; Podoplanin, PDGFRα and Thy1 (as described above) and markers to exclude immune cells (CD45), endothelial cells (CD31) and epithelial cells (EpCAM clone G8.8; all from Biolegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescent Analysis of Distal Colon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Distal colonic tissue was flushed of luminal contents using PBS and fixed for 1 hour in 2% PFA (paraformaldehyde), dehydrated in 30% sucrose overnight at 4°C, and flash-frozen in OTC (organotypic 3D culture) media. Sections were stained with antibodies specific to EPCAM (clone G8.8, catalog #118212; BioLegend), phospho-PDH (Ser 293, ref 31866; Cell Signaling), and Ki67 (clone SolA15, ref 14-5698-82; Invitrogen) overnight, and for 5 minutes for the Hoechst nuclear stain (ref H3570; Invitrogen). For EdU identification, slides were permeabilized with Triton-X-100 (Dow) for 10 minutes and stained in Click-It cocktail (ThermoFisher) for 20 minutes at room temperature. Images were taken on Zeiss LSM 510 and Nikon A1 confocal microscopes and analyzed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mammary Cell Immunophenotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single mammary cells were then incubated with the following primary antibodies: CD31-biotin (clone 390, eBioscience), CD45-biotin (clone 30-F11, eBioscience), Ter119-biotin (clone Ter119, eBioscience), EpCAM (clone G8.8, BioLegend), CD49f (clone GoH3, BioLegend), CD49b (HMα2, BioLegend), and Sca1 (clone D7, BioLegend). Biotin conjugated antibodies were detected with Streptavidin-eFluor450 (eBioscience). Cells were then filtered through a 30-μm cell strainer (Partec) and incubated with 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen) and were analysed by using an LSRII (Becton Dickinson), or sorted on a FACSAria II (Becton Dickinson). The gating strategy to select luminal and basal subsets is shown in Supplementary Fig. 5a. Flow cytometry data were analysed using FlowJo (version 10. Tree Star Inc.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining of Lung Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was done as previously described.14 (link), 35 (link) Briefly, 10 μm lung cryosections were incubated with anti-sialidase antibodies as described above, and either 5 μg/mL rat anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend) or rat anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; clone G8.8, BioLegend). After washing, slides were then incubated with 1 μg/mL donkey F(ab’)2 anti-rabbit Rhodamine-Red-X (711-296-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch), and 1 μg/mL donkey F(ab’)2 anti-rat Alexa Fluor 647 (712-606-153, Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Washed slides were mounted with mounting media containing DAPI (H-1500, Vector Laboratories). Images were captured with a Nikon ECLIPSE Ti2 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FACs analysis of fibroblasts was performed using a panel of typical CAF markers; podoplanin (clone 8.1.1), PDGFRα (clone APA5) and β (clone APB5) (all 1:300, all BioLegend), FAP-α (1:50, AF3715; R&D Systems); and markers to exclude immune cells (MHCII; clone KH74 and CD45; clone 30-F11), epithelial cells (EpCAM, clone G8.8; Biolegend) and endothelial cells (CD31, clone 390; BioLegend). Morphological characteristics assed and visualised using an EVOS microscope and functional analysis was measured in terms of collagen gel contraction capacity. 1.5 × 105 cells were seeded into 2 mg ml−1 collagen gel (BD Biosciences) and detached from the sides of 24 well plates. Gel contraction was imaged over time and quantified as percentage area change over time. CAFs displayed typical CAF morphology, marker profiles and functionality were utilised (Supplementary Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Thymocyte and Thymic Epithelial Cell Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For thymocyte staining, single-thymocyte suspensions were prepared from the thymi of mice using a 70-μm cell strainer. Samples were then stained with specific fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies of cell surface CD markers, indicated in each figure legend, and then fixed and permeabilized with fixation/permeabilization buffer (eBioscience Treg staining kit, #88-8115-40), per company’s instruction, followed by intracellular staining for PE-anti-FoxP3 (eBioscience Cat# 12-5773-82) or FITC-anti-FoxP3 (eBioscience Cat# 11-5773-82), and/or PE-anti-p-Zap70 (Cell Signaling, Cat# 14791, clone 65E4, recognizing phosphorylation at Tyr319/Syk [Tyr352]), PE-anti-Nur77 (eBioscience, Cat# 12-5965-82, clone 12.14), and AlexaFluor488-anti-GFP (BioLegend, Cat# FM264G). For TEC staining, the thymus was cut into pieces, then was digested with Collagenase-V/DNase-I, as per previously published methods [51 (link)], then stained with surface molecules: fluorochrome-conjugated anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11), -MHC-II (clone M5/114.15.2), -Ly51 (clone 6C3), and -EpCAM (clone G8.8), which were purchased from BioLegend, and FITC-anti-Ovalbumin from AbCam (Cat# ab85584). Flow cytometry was performed using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) with 6 colors, and data were analyzed using Flow-Jo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparametric Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections 5 μm in thickness were de-paraffinised and re-hydrated. A pretreatment method using heat-induced epitope retrieval was used, and the nonspecific binding was blocked with a protein blocker (DakoCytomation, Trappe, France) for 30 min at room temperature (RT). The sections were then incubated with the following primary antibodies against Ki67 (ab15580; Abcam), EpCam (clone G8.8; Biolegend), α-SMA (ab21027; Abcam), CD34 (RAM34, eBioscience), GP38 (MA615113; Thermo Fisher), CD24 (ab64064; Abcam), Lysozyme (ab108508; Abcam), Muc2 (Thermo Fisher) and ZO-1 (Invitrogen) antibodies.
The co-labelling with antibodies from the same species was performed using Opal™ Multiplex IHC kits (Akoya). After incubation with the primary antibodies, the slides were washed in PBS-T three times and probed with appropriated fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. After three washings in PBS, the cell nuclei were counterstained by Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Single-Cell Isolation from Mouse Ears

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To produce single-cell suspensions for flow cytometry, dissected mouse ears were split open and the only dermis side lacking cartilage was digested with a digestion buffer (15% collagenase, 1% DNaseI, 10 mM 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 1.5% FBS in HBSS). Single-cell suspensions were washed and stained with the fluorescently labeled antibodies against CD11b (clone M1/70), CD11c (clone N418), CD24 (clone M1/69), CD45 (clone 30-F11), CD64 (clone X54-5/7.1), CD103 (2E7), CD115 (clone AFS98), CD117 (clone 2B8), B220 (clone RA3-6B2), IA/IE (clone M5/114.15.2), FcεRI (clone MAR-1), Sirpα (clone P84), EpCAM (clone G8.8), and isotype controls (all antibodies from Biolegend) for 30 min at 4 °C. These were utilized to compare expression levels. Flow cytometric analysis was performed on a FACS CantoII or LSRII (BD) and was analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!