The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Biocoat matrigel invasion chamber kit

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in United States

The BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber kit is a laboratory equipment designed for measuring the invasive potential of cells. It consists of a cell culture insert with a Matrigel-coated membrane, which serves as a model for the extracellular matrix. Cells are seeded onto the insert and their ability to invade through the Matrigel layer is evaluated.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using biocoat matrigel invasion chamber kit

1

Matrigel Invasion Assay for OSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell invasive potential was examined using a BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber kit (BD Biosciences) and the invasive activity was determined according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 7.5 × 104 cells were added to the transwell insert chamber with a filter coated with Matrigel. In the lower compartment, 750 μL DMEM containing 10% (v/v) FBS was used as the chemoattractant. The cells were incubated with or without OSCC-derived exosomes for 18 h at 37°C under 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere. The inserts were removed and non-invading cancer cells remaining on the upper side of the filter were scraped off. Cells that invaded into the lower side of the filter were then stained with Diff-Quick and microscopically observed and counted in five fields at 200× magnification. The invasive activity of cancer cells was expressed as the mean number of cells that invaded to the lower side of the filter and the results are presented as mean ± SD of cells per field. Experiments were repeated three times in triplicate for each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Invasive Potential of Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasive potential of the cells was evaluated using the BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber kit (BD Biosciences). Briefly, HSC‐4 cells were added to the Transwell insert chamber containing a filter coated with Matrigel at a density of 1.5 × 102 cells/μL. In the lower compartment, 750 μL of DMEM containing 10% FBS was used as the chemoattractant. The HSC‐4 cells were incubated with HSC‐4‐derived exosomes with or without 10 µmol/L of erlotinib or 100 µg/mL of cetuximab for 24 hours at 37°C. After removing the inserts, non–invading cancer cells remaining on the upper side of the filter were scraped off. Cells that invaded the lower side of the filter were then stained with the Diff‐Quick solution (Sysmex Corporation) at room temperature for 10 minutes, observed under a light microscope, and counted over five randomly selected fields at 200× magnification. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Matrigel Invasion Chamber Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assay was performed with Matrigel-coated chambers from a BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber Kit (BD Biosciences). Cells with 500 μl in serum-free medium were added into the upper chamber and complete medium was added into the lower chamber. After incubation for 24 h, non-invasive cells in the upper surface of the membrane were removed and the cells invasion to the lower surface of the membrane were fixed. Cell counting was then carried out by photographing the membrane through the microscope [18 (link)] and five random fields were taken.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Matrigel Invasion Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro cell invasion activity was detected with a Biocoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber kit from BD Biosciences, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 2.5×104 cells in SFM were added into the upper chamber of a matrigel pre-coated insert. The lower chamber was filled with 750 μL of DMEM/10% FBS medium-treated with phenformin at indicated concentrations. After 24 hours, the cells remaining on the upper surface of the membrane were removed with a cotton swab. The cells that had invaded through the membrane were stained with methanol and 0.2% crystal violet, followed by image capture using a Nikon SMZ 745T microscope at 40× magnification. For quantification of invading cells, cells in five randomly selected microscopic fields were counted. The data were based on three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Matrigel Invasion Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell invasion was measured by the Biocoat matrigel invasion chamber kit from BD Bioscience (Sparks, MD, USA) by following the manufacturer's instruction. In brief, cells were suspended in 500 μl blank medium and incubated for 12 h. Then, the matrigel coated plates were rehydrated with warm serum free medium for 2 h. After removing the medium, 2.5 × 104 cells in 500 μl blank medium were added to the upper chamber, and then 750 μl chemoattractant containing 10% FBS was added to the lower compartment. Cells were then incubated in 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C for 36 h. After removing non-invading cells by using a clean cotton swab, invading cells were fixed with formaldehyde and then stained with crystal violet before counting. For each assay, five randomly chosen microscopic fields were counted and the average of these numbers was recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transwell Invasion and Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the Transwell migration assay, untransfected and transfected SGC-7901 cells in the exponential growth phase were trypsinized with 1X trypsin, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and suspended in DMEM without FBS. Cells (2×104 cells/well) were seeded into polycarbonate membrane inserts (8-µm pore size) in 24-well Transwell cell culture dishes. Cells were permitted to attach to the membrane for 30 min. The lower chamber was filled with 600 µl DMEM with 10% FBS. Cells were permitted to migrate for 24 h at 37°C. Following incubation, stationary cells were removed from the upper surface of the membranes. The cells that had migrated to the lower surface were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 min and were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min at the same temperature. The cells that had migrated through the membrane were manually counted at ×200 magnification from 5 fields/filter using a light microscope (TS100; Nikon Corporation). The invasion assay was performed using Matrigel-coated chambers from the BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber kit (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) using the same method as aforementioned for the migration assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Invasive Potential of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasive potential of the cells was evaluated using the BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber kit (BD Biosciences). Briefly, the OSC-4 cells at a density of 7.5×104 cells/500 µl were added to the Transwell insert chamber containing a filter coated with Matrigel. In the lower compartment, 750 µl DMEM containing 10% FBS was used as the chemoattractant. The OSC-4 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of THP-1- or PHM-derived exosomes for 24 h at 37°C. The inserts were removed and non-invading cancer cells remaining on the upper side of the filter were scraped off. Cells that invaded the lower side of the filter were then stained with the Diff-Quick solution (Sysmex Corporation) at room temperature for 10 mins and light microscopically observed and counted in five randomly selected fields, at ×200 magnification. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell migration and invasion assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 24 h transfection, complete growth medium was replaced by serum-free medium. The cell migration assay was performed in 24-well transwell plates with 8.0-µm pore size membrane inserts (Corning, New York, NY, USA) whereas the in vitro invasion assay was performed using the BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber kit (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) as previously described.9 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Invasion and Wound-Healing Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion assay was performed using a BD BioCoat Matrigel invasion chamber kit (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). TE-11 cells were separated using cell dissociation solution (Sigma) and 5×104 cells/600 μl were added to the top chamber of a cell culture insert in a 24-well companion plate. After 48-h incubation, the cells that had invaded the lower surface of the membrane were fixed with methanol and subjected to Giemsa staining. The number of the migrated cells was quantified by counting them in ten random distinct fields using a light microscope.
For wound-healing assay, TE-11 cells were seeded in a 4-well chamber slide glass, and an artificial ‘wound’ was carefully created by scratching the confluent cell monolayer with the tip of a P-200 pipette. Medium with the scratched out cells were changed and then the scrambled siRNA and podoplanin siRNA were transfected into the cells. Microphotographs were taken after 0, 24 and 48 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Gastric Cancer Cell Invasion and Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invasion and migration assays were performed six times using the BD BioCoat MatrigelTM Invasion Chamber kit (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) following the manufacturer's protocols. In brief, 1×105 gastric cancer cells (MKN45) were loaded in the upper Boyden chamber in RPMI supplemented with 10% exosome-depleted fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and TEX. The lower chamber contained RPMI without FBS. After incubation for 48 hours at 37°C, duplicate membranes were processed and evaluated by counting cells in 10 random fields under a microscope. The migration assay was performed in parallel with the invasion assay under the same conditions, except using an uncoated membrane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!