The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using jem 1200 exii

1

Corrosion Analysis of Carbon Steel in Seawater

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL JEM-1200EX II, Jeol, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was used for the direct observation of the damages at the surface of carbon steel sheets after exposure of seawater for 168 h, in absence or presence of TOE. Small samples were cut from carbon steel sheets and their surface was cleaned with ethanol to remove any deposited corrosion product prior to SEM analysis. The samples were not sputter-coated.
UV and FT-IR spectra of the TOE-seawater before and after immersion of the carbon steel sample were conducted using Perkin–Elmer UV–visible L spectrophotometer and FTIR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optical Characterization of Biosynthesized Platinum Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of optical property of biological synthesized platinum nanoparticles using O. radix s was made using ultraviolet and visible absorption spectroscopy (spectrophotometer Cary E 500) in the range of 250 nm–600 nm. In order to characterize the synthesized platium nanoparticles, there was conducted Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) using Perkin Elmer Spectrum 1000, in attenuated total reflection mode and using spectral range of 4000–380 cm − 1, with a resolution of 4 cm − 1. The structure of biological synthesized platinum nanoparticles was studied using TEM (Transmission electron microscope) JEOL JEM 1200 EXII, operating at 80 kV. In this work AFM (atomic force microscope) INTEGRA SPECTRA SOLAR of NT-MDT brand and measurement tips dedicated for NSGO1 high-resolution measurements was used. The picture of biological synthesized platinum nanoparticles was prepared by means of SEM (scanning electron microscopy) SEM SU3500, Hitachi with spectral imaging system Thermo Scientific NSS (EDS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Coral Nubbin Decalcification and TEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The coral nubbins were processed according to the method described in Patten et al. (2008) (link). The coral nubbins were fixed with 2.5% v/v glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). Then they were decalcified using a solution made of 10% EDTA in 0.03 M NaOH and dehydrated in 30 to 100% of acetone series diluted in water (Wilson et al., 2005 (link)). Samples were kept in the dark at 4°C throughout the decalcification and fixation process. The decalcified samples were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in cacodylate buffer before being embedded in Epon 812 epoxy resin (TAAB laboratories, United Kingdom), sectioned and imaged by TEM (JEOL JEM-1200EX II; JEOL, Japan). 70 nm thick sections were used and they were positively stained using Uranly acetate and Lead citrate. Micrographs were obtained using a digital Erlangshen ES1000W CCD camera (Gatan, United States) and Gatan Digital Micrograph software (United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibrils from Agave Pulp

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolation of cellulose nanofibrils from the treated agave pulp was carried out using a colloid mill (Super Mascolloider Microprocessor, from Masuko Sangyo Co., Ltd., Kawaguchi, Japan). The pulp suspension, with a consistency of 2%, was filtered five times through two discs at 1500 rpm, with a distance between discs of 0.1 mm.
The obtained cellulose nanofibrils were analyzed with a Transmission Electron Microscope (JEOL JEM 1200EX-II from JEOL Ltd. Tokio, Japan) coupled with a Gatan CCD high-resolution camera (Orius SC1000B). The microfibers were previously diluted at 0.002 wt% in distilled water, sonicated for 10 min, and placed on a palladium grid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A morphological analysis of NPs was performed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEOL JEM1200EXII, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). NP suspensions were diluted 10-fold in PBS (pH 7.4) and dropped onto carbon-coated copper grids (FC300Cu, EM Resolutions, Saffron Walden, UK) with the liquid being quickly removed by touching the edge of the grid with filter paper. Negative staining was performed by exposing samples to 2% uranyl acetate for 30 s, which was also removed by filter paper absorption. Samples were stored in a desiccator after air drying until being viewed in the TEM. At least three batches of each NP were prepared. Representative TEM photos presented in the manuscript were taken from batches prepared on the same date to maximize comparing/characterize NPs. Average NP size was determined from the measurement of 100 randomly selected NPs from different locations on the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Imaging of EcTI-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (50,000 cells/well) were seeded in a 24-well plate before treatment with EcTI (100 µM) for 24 h, washed with PBS, and incubated with Versene solution for 5–7 min. Cells were fixed with 2% (v/v) formaldehyde and 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and diluted in the buffer cacodylate (0.1 M, pH 7.2). Cells were then embedded in 4% (v/v) agar, and fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide in sodium cacodylate (0.1 M, pH 7.2) for 2 h. Then, the cells were dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations (70%, 90% (v/v), and absolute). A mixture of propylene oxide and Epon 612 resin (1:1) was added to the samples overnight. Then, pure Epon was added to the mixture for an additional 2 h under vacuum and polymerized in an oven at 60 °C for 48 h. In the fenestrated copper metallic grid, ultra-thin cuts (70 nm) were placed, and uranyl acetate/plumb citrate was used as a contrast. The images were examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM 1200 EX II, JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA) operated at 80 kV. Micrographs were acquired with a GATAN 791 camera (USA), while brightness, contrast levels, and image resolution were adjusted using ADOBE Photoshop 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopic images of the materials were taken using a transmission electron microscope JEOL JEM-1200 EX II (JEOL, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sizing and Imaging of β-blocker nanoMIPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and shape of the nanoMIPs for β-blockers (atenolol and labetalol) was determined in water using dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyzer, from Brookhaven Instruments Corporation Ltd. (Holtsville, NY, USA) and based on images of dry nanoMIPs obtained by a transmission electron microscope (TEM), JEOL/JEM 1200 EX II (Tokyo, Japan). The size analyzed by DLS includes data of mean hydrodynamic diameter (D), polydispersity index (PDI), and standard deviation (Std dev) of the nanoMIPs dispersion in milli-Q water. Prior to measurements, nanoMIPs were preconcentrated by evaporation and constant bubbling with N2 to avoid their drying. DLS was performed in 1 mL of the solution of nanoMIPs in water at 25 °C. The measurements were conducted using 3 cm3 disposable polystyrene cuvettes.
Before TEM analysis, samples were sonicated for 5 min, and then 20 µL of the nanoMIPs dispersion was placed on a carbon-coated copper grid and dried at ambient temperature under a fume hood. After that, thin film of a sample was ready for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Analysis of Broccoli Nectaries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The completely open flowers derived from T54S, T54M and T54C, were dissected and dehydrated through a series of increasing ethanol solutions. Additionally, the materials were then critically point-dried with solvent-substituted liquid carbon dioxide and coated with a thin layer of gold palladium. Photomicrographs were obtained using a JEOL 5800 LV at 20 kV (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA, USA). At maturity, the nectaries of broccoli at bolting stage were cut off and pre-fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde and 4% formaldehyde in phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 4 h. The nectaries were then post-fixed in 1.5% OsO4 at 4 °C in the same buffer for 4 h, and then, the samples were dehydrated in ascending graded series of acetone and embedded in Spurr’s resin. Ultrathin sections were made using a Reichert ultramicrotome and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate [43 (link),44 (link)]. The equipment of JEOL-JEM 1200 Ex II transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used for identifying all the samples at 85 kV.
In addition, the agronomic traits of the broccoli lines T54S, T54M and 54C were investigated during the harvest, flowering, seed ripening and seed germination stages. All the data were analyzed with SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Co., Ltd., New York, NY, USA), and one-way ANOVA was carried out on the agronomic trait data at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Cu@Pt Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this work, the UV–VIS absorption spectra of the synthesized Cu@Pt nanoparticles were obtained from a spectrophotometer Cary E 5000 in the range of 300–800 nm using a quartz cell with 10 mm of optical path length (Agilent, USA). FTIR spectra of the samples were measured using Perkin-Elmer Spectrum 1000, in attenuated total reflection mode, and using the spectral range of 4000–380 cm−1. The study also used one instrument in the diffuse reflectance mode at the resolution of 4 cm−1 in KBr pellets (Perkin Elmer, USA). The obtained Cu@Pt nanoparticles were characterized using an Atomic Force Microscope (Agilent, USA). The size and morphology of the synthesized Cu@Pt nanoparticles were characterized using a Transmission Electron Microscope JEOL JEM 1200 EXII, operating at 200 kV. Moreover, we used a Scanning Electron Microscope (HR SEM) Helios NanoLab 660 (FEI). SEM imaging was performed in the immersion mode (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!