The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using 0.8 μm filter

1

Exosome Isolation and Characterization from Cell Culture and Clinical Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells at passage 1–15 were cultured in exosome-free medium (containing 5% exosome-depleted FBS) for 48 h. Conditioned medium from ∼107 cells was collected, filtered through a 0.8-μm filter (Millipore) and concentrated (16,500 g for 20 min and 110,000 g for 70 min)4 (link)34 (link). For exosome isolation from clinical samples, human sera were obtained from venipuncture and used unpooled. Whole-blood samples were collected in non-citrated vacutainer tubes (Becton Dickinson) from both GBM patients and healthy donors under Institutional Review Board approved protocols and utilizing standard operating procedures. Sera were processed following clot formation for 30 min. After brief centrifugation (1,100 g for 10 min), sera were sterile-filtered through a 0.8-μm filter (Millipore) and frozen at –80 °C within 2 h of collection. Thawed samples were used unidentified and directly for target-specific exosome isolation as described below. For measurement of exosome size distribution and concentration, we used the nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) system (LM10, Nanosight). For optimal counting, exosome concentrations were adjusted to obtain ∼50 exosomes in the field of view and all NTA measurements were performed with identical experiment settings for consistency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Production of Lentiviral Vectors for Reprogramming

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Production of VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral vectors was performed according to the previously described protocol44 (link). Briefly, 7 × 106 293 T cells (kindly gifted by dr. Maciej Wiznerowicz, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland) were seeded onto 10 cm dishes in the DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and subsequently subjected to the triple plasmid transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI, Polysciences Inc.) as a transfectant reagent. Reprogramming vectors were produced utilizing hSTEMCCA plasmid construct containing four transcription factors: OCT3/4A, KLF4, SOX2 and c-MYC within one expression cassette (kindly provided by dr. Gustavo Mostoslavsky, Boston University, USA45 (link)) whereas in case of control vectors, FUGW plasmid, harboring GFP cDNA, was used (Addgene 14883). Additionally, psPAX2 and pMD2.G plasmids (kindly provided by dr Maciej Wiznerowicz, Greater Poland Cancer Center) served as a source of tat, rev, gag/pol and VSV-G, respectively. 48 h post-transfection, media containing vectors were collected, filtered through 0.8 μm filters (Millipore), aliquoted, and frozen at −80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of CSF-derived Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)samples from four patients diagnosed with primary GBM were collected during surgery, with informed consent obtained according to the appropriate protocol, approved by the UC San Diego Institutional Review Board. The samples were centrifuged at 1500×g at room temperature for 10 min, immediately after collection to remove cells. The supernatants were filtered through the 0.8 μm filters (Millipore), aliquoted into cryotubes (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and stored at −80 °C for 12–24 months. The aliquots of 3 ml were thawed on ice, and used to isolate MV, exosomes, and RNP fractions by sequential filtration, as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation of Nascent Extracellular Vesicles from THP1 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nascents mEVs were harvested from serum‐free conditioned media of THP1 cells. Cells were transferred into serum‐free medium for 18–20 h at 5–10 × 105/mL concentration. The viability of cells was ≥ 90–95% (assessed by Annexin V‐FITC binding by flow cytometry). Cells were centrifuged twice at 300 g at RT for 10 min. The pellet was discarded and the supernatant was transferred into new tubes each time. The supernatant was then filtered through a 5 μm filter (Millipore), was centrifuged at 2,000 g at 18°C for 20 min and was filtered again through a 0.8 μm filter (Millipore). The flow‐through was then centrifuged at 12,500 g at 16°C for 40 min as described previously (Németh et al., 2017 (link); Visnovitz et al., 2019 (link)). The supernatant was removed with a needle and syringe, and the pellet was washed once in 0.2 μm filtered (Millipore) 10 mM HEPES containing 0.9% NaCl, pH 7.4 (‘EV buffer’). Again, the supernatant was removed with a needle and syringe, and the pellet was re‐suspended in 130 μL EV buffer. Ten μL was kept frozen at ‐80°C for later bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein measurements (Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific), while the rest was used for incubation in (i) EVDP samples, or (ii) EV buffer (see below).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles from Human Vestibular Schwannoma Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary human VS cells were cultured for 7 days. The culture medium was then replaced with a culture medium supplemented with 5% EV-depleted fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco #16140–071, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, United States), purified by high-speed centrifugation to deplete EVs from the FBS. After 48 h, conditioned media were collected and centrifuged for 10 min at 300 g, then 10 min at 2000 g at 4°C. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.8 μm filter (Millipore; Burlington, MA, United States). EVs were pelleted by centrifugation at 100,000 g for 80 min at 4°C in a Type 70 Ti Rotor (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States).
The particle distributions (EVs) from the cells were measured using a Nanosight LM20 machine (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, United Kingdom). A human NF2 VS-derived cell line (HEI-193) immortalized with human papilloma virus E6-7 genes was acquired from House Ear Institute (Los Angeles, CA, United States) (25 (link)) and used as a control in the particle distribution measurement (Supplementary Figure S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) were isolated by ultracentrifugation and characterized using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and western blotting (WB) for protein maker detection, as described previously [21 (link)]. Briefly, ASCs were grown to 70% confluence and then incubated in DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% exosome-depleted FBS (pre-ultracentrifuged at 120,000 g overnight). After 48 h, conditioned media was collected and centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min, then 2000g for 20 min, and then filtered through a 0.8-μm filter (Millipore), followed by centrifugation at 16,500g for 45 min to isolate ectosomes. Exosomes were isolated by subsequent centrifugation at 110,000g for 70 min. The supernatant after pelleting the EVs was collected and defined as the "EV-depleted fraction". For in vitro and in vivo experiments, EV pellets were thoroughly washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in PBS and then stored at -80 °C until usage. All centrifugations were performed at 4 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Profiling Serum Biomarkers in Glioblastoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GBM patients and healthy volunteers were recruited according to an Institutional Review Board approved protocol with informed consent. A total of 32 individuals were enroled. For the profiling study, we obtained serum samples from cancer patients (n=17), harbouring newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma, as well as healthy volunteers (n=15). Cancer diagnoses were confirmed by neuropathologic examination and clinical imaging. Methylation status of MGMT in cancer patients were determined on pathologic tissues using methylation-specific PCR, performed independently by the Massachusetts General Hospital Pathology Service. For longitudinal evaluation, serial serum samples were collected from each patient (n=7) at distinctive treatment follow-ups. All serum samples were filtered through a 0.8-μm filter (Millipore) to remove cells and debris and used directly for immunomagnetic capture before mRNA analyses. All patients received standard-of-care TMZ treatment. Responder, stable and non-responder status were assigned by a neuro-oncologist (F.H.H.), without knowledge of iMER results, based on commonly used response criteria: (1) MRI evaluation for presence of gadolinium enhancement changes based on bi-dimensional accepted criteria31 (link) and (2) clinical assessment (for example, performance status, steroid dose changes and neurologic examination).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Surgical Manipulation of E2 Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surgical manipulations were performed on E2 embryos. A slit was made between the neural tube and right somite along the anteroposterior axis, with a sharpened tungsten needle. The embryo was then separated into a right axial structure-depleted side and a left control side. Both parts were fixed with PFA soon after the manipulation or incubated for 4 h at 38 °C on a 0.8-μm filter (Millipore) placed in a 6-cm Center-Well Culture Dish (Falcon) containing 10% fetal bovine serum/DMEM (Nissui).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Viral Fraction Extraction and Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 50 mg of arthropods from the STE0043 sample were washed in 70% ethanol, as previously described (Slimani et al., 2013 (link)) and crushed in 2 mL of sterile EMEM medium (Life Technologies, Saint Aubin, France) using two 3-mm tungsten beads and a TissueLyser at 25 Hz for 2 min (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France). The supernatant was harvested after a low speed clarification and subsequently filtered through a 0.8-μm filter (Millipore, Molsheim, France). The resulting supernatant was purified onto a discontinuous 66–30% sucrose gradient and ultracentrifuged at 130,000 g for 2 h at +4°C, as described above.
The viral fraction was harvested at the interphase between the 66 and 30% sucrose layers and fixed for 1 h at +4°C with 2% final glutaraldehyde. The fixed viral fraction was then diluted to a final volume of 4 mL in PBS, and adsorbed directly onto formvar carbon films on 400 mesh nickel grids (FCF400-Ni, EMS) by ultracentrifugation at 130,000 g for 1 h at +4°C, as previously described (Sime-Ngando et al., 1996 (link)). Grids were stained for 10 s with 1% molybdate solution in filtered water at room temperature. Electron micrographs were obtained on a Tecnai G2 transmission electron microscope (FEI) operated at 200 keV equipped with a 4096 × 4096 pixel resolution Eagle camera (FEI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fecal RNA Extraction for Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were extracted from germfree or conventionalized mice fecal supernatant using miRCUCY RNA Isolation- cell and plants kit (Exiqon) following the manufacturer's instructions with some modifications. Briefly, 100 mg of mouse feces was homogenized in 1ml of sterile PBS, spun down at 300 ×g for 10 min. The supernatant was further spun down at 2000 ×g for 15 min and supernatant was filtered through a 0.8 μm filter (Millipore). Lysis buffer containing RNA Spike-In (UniSp2, UniSp4, and UniSp5) was added to fecal supernatant and followed by RNA isolation according to manufacturer's instruction (Exiqon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!