The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using alexa 647 labeled secondary antibody

1

Quantification of Tau-Induced Stress Granule Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa P4 cells82 (link) were grown on poly-l-lysine coated 12 mm coverslips (No 1.5), permeabilized with 0.003–0.005% digitonin in TPB (20 mM HEPES pH 7.3–7.4, 110 mM KOAc, 2 mM Mg(OAC)2, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT and 1 µg ml–1 each aprotinin, pepstatin and leupeptin). After several stringent washes, nuclear pores were blocked by 15 min incubation with 200 µg ml–1 wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) on ice. Cells were then incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the absence (background control) or presence of 400 nM recombinant/purified tau protein (K18, K25, hTau40, or Ac-hTau40) or 5 µM TMR-labeled peptides, respectively, in TPB. Tau proteins to be compared quantitatively had similar DOL ( ± 3%) or were corrected to achieve similar DOLs by mixing with unlabeled protein of the same concentration (“DOL corrected”). After several stringent washes to remove non-bound protein, cells were fixed and subjected to immunofluorescence for G3BP1 (Proteintech) and TIA-1 (Santa Cruz, C-20; sc-1751) using Alexa 555 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Alexa 647-labeled secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively, to visualize SGs. Tia-1 was stained using an Alexa 647-labeled secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific), while G3BP1 was stained using either Alexa 488 (with TMR-labeled peptides) or Alexa 555 (with tau proteins) secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescent Staining of Mouse Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPET sampes were cut into 1.5 μm sections. Samples were deparaffinized in a descending xylene and ethanol series and rehydrated in deionized water for 30 s. Subsequently, antigen retrieval and protein blocking (Dako) were conducted. Anti-mouse CD31 (clone SZ31, Dianova) and anti-mouse CD45 antibodies (clone 30-F11, eBioscience) were applied as primary antibodies. The primary antibody incubation (1 hour) was followed by incubation with Alexa647-labeled secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher) for 30 min in dark. Subsequently, the sections were covered with a DAPI-containing mounting medium (Fluoro-Gel II, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Fluorescence measurements of slides were performed using a slide scanner Pannoramic 250 Flash (3D Histech, Budapest, Hungary). Image visualization was done with the software Pannoramic Viewer (3D Histech, Budapest, Hungary).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanoparticle Targeting in BSG D10 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BSG D10 cells were seeded on poly-L-lysine and laminin-coated chamber slides and grown under the culture conditions specified above. The cells were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline, fixed in 10% formaldehyde in neutral buffer solution for 15 minutes, and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 for a further 10 minutes. The cells were then blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin for one hour, followed by incubation with MnPB-A488, MnPB-A488-AbC, or MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticles for one additional hour. The cells were then rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline and immunostained for GFAP using anti-GFAP antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and Alexa-647-labeled secondary antibody (Life Technologies). For visualizing nuclei, the cells were briefly stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Life Technologies) and imaged using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and ZEN 2009 software. Flow cytometry analysis of MnPB-A488, MnPB-A488-AbC, and MnPB-A488-ANG2 nanoparticle specificity for BSG D10 was performed as described previously.26 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Heterogeneity of IL-2 Receptor Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to investigate relative levels of IL-2Rβ within the Jurkat cell population, cells were incubated with antibody against IL-2Rβ. 100,000 cells were resuspended in fresh medium and incubated with primary antibody against IL-2Rβ (Novus Biologicals) at 1:10 dilution for one hour at room temperature. The cells were then washed three times and incubated for one hour with Alexa 647-labeled secondary antibody (Life Technologies) at 1:200 dilution for one hour at room temperature, followed by three additional washes. Cells were analyzed in two ways: by flow cytometry using a BD LSR Fortessa and by fluorescent microscopy using a PerkinElmer UltraVIEW VoX spinning disk confocal microscope with a Nikon Ti-E camera. The relative intensity of the Alexa 647 signal was quantified for each cell and used to assess the heterogeneity of available IL-2Rβ within the population. In order to investigate relative levels of IL-2Rα and IL-2Rβ on the same cell, cells were incubated with FITC-labeled antibody against IL-2Rα (BioLegend) and APC-labeled antibody against IL-2Rβ. Cells were analyzed using flow cytometry, as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunostaining of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues and organoids were subjected to immunostaining using the anti-Ki67 (1:1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific; 14-5698), anti-Sox2 (1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; ab97959), anti-p63 (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX; sc8344), anti-Krt14 (1:100; BioLegend, San Diego, CA; 905304), and anti-Krt8 (1:100; DSHB, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; TROMA-I) primary antibodies and Alexa 594-labeled and Alexa 647-labeled secondary antibodies (1:200; Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!