The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using optima ct540

1

Non-Contrast Chest CT Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients included underwent non-contrast CT scans using the following multidetector CT scanners (Somatom definition AS, Somatom definition flash, Siemens Healthcare; Optima CT540, Optima 680, GE Healthcare). Each CT scan was performed during end stage of inspiration with supine position, ranging from lung apex to diaphragm. The detailed CT parameters were listed as follows: (1) voltage 120 kVp, (2) reference tube current 110–250 mAs, (3) detector collimation 16–320 × 0.5–0.625 mm, (4) slice thickness 1.0–1.25 mm, (5) slice interval of 0.9–1.25 mm, and (6) pitch of 1–1.375.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Non-Contrast CT Evaluation of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients underwent a non-contrast CT scan at admission within 48 h after ictus on multidetector row scanners (Optima CT540, General Electric Healthcare, Connecticut, USA; or SOMATOM Sensation 16, Siemens, Germany) with the following parameters: slice thickness, 5 mm; 120 kV, and 100–300 mAs. Images were reviewed in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format by two board-certified neurologists blinded to the data and not involved in clinical management. Hematoma volume was calculated per protocol on the baseline and stability CT using semi-automatic software (ITK-SNAP software, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; www.itksnap.org). IVH was defined as an intraventricular hyperdense image that was not attributable to the choroid plexus or calcification and was not included in the hematoma volume. Lobar ICH was defined as a hematoma restricted to the frontal, temporal, parietal, or occipital areas. The origin of the hemorrhage appeared at the cortical and subcortical junctions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biphasic Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal and Thoracic CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Abdominopelvic and thoracic CT was performed with a Discovery NM/CT 670 CZT, a digital SPECT/CT imaging system, including Optima CT540 subsystem (GE Healthcare, Tirat, Hacarmel, Israel). A helical CT tomogram with a modulated mAs (noise index ~30), a rotation time of 0.5 s, 120 kVp, a pitch of 0.938 and 1.25-mm slice thickness was acquired. Soft tissue, bone and lung kernels were employed with a 40% dose reduction in the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR, GE Healthcare, USA) algorithm. A biphasic contrast-enhanced CT protocol (arterial phase of 10 s, followed by venous phase at 30 s) was performed. Contrast agent (Omnipaque (iohexol)™ GE Healthcare, iodine concentration of 350 mg/ml) was used unless clinical contraindications were present.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Non-Contrast CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were imaged on the following CT scanners without contrast administration or electrocardiographic gating: GE Optima 660, GE Lightspeed VCT, Neurologica Corp Caretom, Siemens Somatom Sensation 16, and GE Optima CT 540. Images were reconstructed at 2.5 mm slice thickness. Scans with reconstructions at different slice thickness were excluded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CT Imaging Characteristics of Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CT examination was performed using two multidetector CT scanners (Somatom Perspective, Siemens, Germany, and Optima CT 540, GE, America), using the following parameters: tube voltage = 120 kVp, tube current (regulated by automatic dose modulation), 30–75 mAs, pitch = 1–1.25 mm, matrix = 512 × 512, slice thickness = 5 mm, and FOV = 350 mm × 350 mm.
Image reconstruction was done at a slice thickness of 1–1.25 mm. All were the initial CT scans at the time of patients’ admission and are performed as non-contrast studies. Two experienced radiologists (20 years of experience) independently reviewed all the scans, and they were blinded to the patients’ clinical and laboratory data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Early CT Findings in COVID-19 Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From 20 January 2020 to 2 February 2020, 6 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in our hospital were recruited, including 1 male and 5 females (average age 40±10 years) (Table 1). All patients underwent HRCT within 2 days after the onset of symptoms. All 6 patients had visited Wuhan or had contact with a confirmed COVID-19 patient. The clinical manifestations of these patients included fever, cough, sore throat, and fatigue. All patients were positive for 2019 novel coronavirus nucleic acid via laboratory testing of respiratory secretions obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage, endotracheal aspirate, nasopharyngeal swab, or oropharyngeal swab. HRCT images were acquired using a GE scanner (GE Medical Systems Optima CT540) with slice thickness of 1.25 mm. The images were transmitted to the workstation and viewed in the PACS system.
CT images were evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists. In case of disagreement, a third senior radiologist offered an opinion and made the decision. Imaging features were evaluated in the following patterns:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Non-contrast CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were imaged on any of the following CT scanners without contrast administration or electrocardiographic gating: GE Optima 660, GE Lightspeed VCT, Siemens Somatom Sensation 16, and GE Optima CT 540. Images were reconstructed at 2.5 mm slice thickness.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CT Imaging Protocol for COVID-19 Lung Grading

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chest CT scans were performed with a single inspiratory phase in one commercial multi-detector CT scanner (Optima CT540, GE Healthcare, U.S.A.). Patients were instructed on breath-holding to minimize the motion artifacts. CT images were acquired by the protocol of tube voltage, 100–120 kVp; effective tube current, 110–250 mAs, detector collimation, 0.625 mm; slice thickness, 1 mm; slice interval, 0.8 mm. Based on the raw data, the CT images were reconstructed by iterative reconstruction technique if possible.
The image analysis and grading were performed by three experienced radiologists, including Wei Chen, Zhihan Yan and Chongyong Xu, who have 10 to 15 years of experience in thoracic radiology, respectively. The final scores and grading were determined by consensus. The distribution of lung abnormalities was recorded as mild (axial CT shows peripheral and subpleural ground glass attenuation, Fig. 1a), moderate (the high-density shadow of plaques involving multiple lung lobes (≥ 3), CT shows ground glass, cloud flocculent or paving stone like changes, at least 2 lung lobes show pulmonary consolidation, local pulmonary fibrosis, and air bronchograms sign can be seen, Fig. 1b), or severe (CT showed diffuse consolidation [minimum of 80% of pulmonary or involving of 4 lobes] or cord like changes, and fibrosis was formed, Fig. 1c).

CT grading of COVID-19

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multidetector CT Examination of Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CT examination was performed using two multidetector CT scanner (Somatom Perspective, Siemens, Germany and Optima CT 540, GE, USA), using the following parameters: tube voltage = 120 kVp, tube current (regulated by automatic dose modulation) 30–75 mAs, pitch=1–1.25mm, matrix = 512 × 512, slice thickness = 5 mm, and FOV = 350 mm × 350 mm.
The patients were in the supine and headfirst position and received scanning with breath held. No contrast was administered. All images were transmitted to the post-processing workstation and reconstructed using high-resolution and conventional algorithms at a slice thickness of 1–1.25 mm.
Three experienced radiologists (20 and15 years of clinical experience in chest imaging) reviewed all the scans; they were blinded to the patients’ clinical and laboratory data. The final decisions were established by consensus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Chest CT Imaging Protocol for Pulmonary Embolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chest CT scans were performed using a 16-Slice CT Scanner (GE Medical Systems, Optima CT540) with 2.5-mm section thickness, 1.25-mm reconstruction slice thickness, and 120 KVp tube voltage. Non-contrast chest CT scan was obtained with the patient in supine position and at end-inspiration when possible, while a dedicated CT Pulmonary Angiography protocol with bolus tracking was acquired in cases of suspected pulmonary embolism.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!