The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Aperio scanscope at turbo

Manufactured by Leica Biosystems
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo is a digital slide scanner designed for high-throughput, automated scanning of histological samples. It is capable of scanning slides at a resolution of up to 40x magnification and can handle a variety of slide sizes. The device is intended to facilitate the digitization of pathological samples for further analysis and storage.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using aperio scanscope at turbo

1

Quantifying Adipose Tissue Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stained tissue sections were scanned at ×20 with an Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo slide scanner (Leica Biosystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL). Five randomly selected images per slide were taken at ×20 magnification. Two independent observers counted positively stained macrophages and total adipocytes for each field (measuring 500 × 500 microns, five per slides) using a program named AM Counter [28 (link)]. Stained cells displaying the known morphological characteristics of macrophages were counted as adipose tissue macrophages (ATM). From this, we determined the ratio of ATM to adipocytes per field of view. All slides were marked with a code rather than the sample identity to ensure the independent observers were blinded to the participants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Kidney Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescent staining was successful in 14 kidneys (n = 8 male, n = 6 female). Sub-standard immunofluorescence in the remaining kidneys was likely due to inadequate fixation because of the lag time between death and autopsy.
Sections were scanned at 400 × using an Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo (Leica Biosystems; Vista, CA, USA). Using Image J (v.6·2, National Institutes of Health; MD, USA), composite images of 50 glomerular cross-sections per kidney (approximately 16 from each of the outer, middle and inner cortex) were assessed. Initially, the total number of DAPI-stained nuclei per glomerulus were counted. Subsequently, WT-1 + podocytes and vWF + endothelial cells were identified and counted. Cells not labelled as podocytes or endothelial cells in the composite image were classified as non-epithelial cells (the vast majority of these cells being mesangial cells). The relative proportions of each cell type was then calculated, and the average determined per kidney.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides stained for VEGF, MMP-9, GLUT1, laminin/GFAP, and desmin/α-SMA were scanned at 40 × magnification to digitalised files using Aperio Scanscope AT Turbo (VEGF, MMP-9, GLUT1; Leica Biosystems, Germany) or Aperio Scanscope FL (laminin/GFAP, desmin/α-SMA; Leica Biosystems, Germany), and viewed with Aperio ImageScope (v12.3.3 for Windows, Leica Biosystems, Germany). Using these files, images were extracted from each of three separate, non-overlapping areas of 500 μm × 500 μm within each of four regions of interest in the brain: the cortical grey mater (Cx), the periventricular white matter (PVWM), the subcortical white matter (sCWM), and the subventricular zone (SVZ). Analysis of these images was performed using Image J software (v2.0.0 for Mac; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) using previously published techniques [46 (link)]. Image analysis and quantification were undertaken by two researchers independently (AB and TY) on coded slides so that all analysis was blinded to the animal group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Automated Immune Cell Quantification in EMPD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eighteen (86%) of the 21 cases of EMPD were subjected to evaluation of CD3, CD8, and PD-1 in the immune infiltrate by automated image analysis. Three cases were excluded from automated image analysis because of metastatic disease in a lymph node (n = 1), a scant immune infiltrate (n = 1), or a small biopsy specimen (n = 1). The slides chosen were scanned at 20× magnification (Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo; Leica Biosystems). With the help of image analysis software (Aperio ImageScope), three 1 mm2 squares were designated in the areas of highest density of immune cells positive for the IHC marker in question. The number of cells positive for the marker in each of the 3 squares was then counted using a modified nuclear algorithm, as described in our previous study [18 (link)]. For each tumor, the mean number of cells positive per square was then calculated to obtain a final number of positive cells per mm2 for each case.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Neuroserpin Expressing Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were digitised using slidescanners (AperioScanScope AT Turbo, Leica Biosystems; 3DHistech) at 20× and 40× magnification and stored on a server (msdlt‐slide.dpag.ox.ac.uk). The regions of interest were outlined using the imagescope programme (Aperio, v11.2.0.780) and the longest diameter of every neuroserpin‐immunopositive (neuroserpin‐ip) cell body in the telencephalic wall was manually measured. Heatmaps were visualised based on the coordinates of neuroserpin‐ip cells using qgis 3.2.2 software (Ic6 line).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Immune Marker Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were scanned at 20× magnification (Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo; Leica Biosystems). Image analysis software (Aperio Image-Scope) tabulated the number of IHC-positive cells within designated areas. The relatively small size of immune cells enabled a modified version of the Nuclear v9 algorithm to be applied as a basis for detecting immune marker positivity, and the intensity thresholds were adjusted manually to remove background artifacts and to account for variable differences in cell size (especially for PD-L1). CD3, CD8, and PD-1 expression were assessed in lymphocytes, whereas PD-L1 expression was counted in tumor cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Kidney Histopathology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kidney histopathology was conducted as previously described (22 (link)). Briefly, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of 3 µm thickness were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) for histopathological analysis. PAS-stained slides were imaged by Aperio Scanscope AT Turbo (Leica Biosystems). Mean glomerular cross-sectional area was quantified by polygon tracing using ImageJ software (NIH, 1.52d). Mean disease score criteria were assessed blinded as follows; 0 – Normal glomerular cellularity and morphology; 1 – Mild cellular expansion and/or early-stage disrupted glomerular morphology which includes lobularity and/or Bowman’s space enlargement; 2 – Advanced cellular expansion with distinct disruption to glomerular morphology, pyknosis and/or karyorrhexis; 3 – Severe cellular expansion/consolidation with advanced lobularity or fragmentation and/or enlargement of the Bowman’s space with cellular infiltration (with or without crescent formation) and/or peri-glomerular cellular expansion and/or evidence of segmental necrosis; 4 – End-stage glomerular destruction, progressive or complete loss of cellularity and/or distinct glomerular morphology. At least 30 glomeruli were assessed for each kidney.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histological Analysis of Allograft Rejection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the time of recipient endpoint, lymph nodes, spleen, and the allograft were collected in 10% formalin for histological evaluation. These samples were embedded in paraffin with subsequent sectioning and hematoxylin and eosin staining. Staining for high affinity LFA-1 was performed on specimens from our previous NHP transplant studies (35 (link)). Samples were identified, then stained after deparaffinization using AL-579 as a primary antibody and visualized using the LSAB+ labeled Streptavidin-Biotin kit (Dako; Carpenteria, CA, USA). Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. Needle-core biopsies were also obtained for animals with potential rejection without meeting the requirements for humane euthanasia. Images were digitally scanned using Aperio Scanscope AT Turbo (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of EphB4 and Ephrin-B in Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patient material used to explore EphB4 and ephrin-B protein expression was included in TMA slides. Breast cancer samples from 216 patients from the Stockholm II trial were analyzed as previously reported (21 (link)). Briefly, the slides were baked for 2 h at 60°C before the PT-Link system (Dako) was used at pH 6.0 for 20 min at 97°C for deparaffinization, rehydration and antigen retrieval. Primary antibodies were diluted 1:50 (mouse anti-EphB4) or 1:200 (mouse anti-pan ephrin-B) with overnight incubation at 4°C. The HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Envision+System-HRP Labelled-Polymer anti mouse, Dako, Ref#4002) was used with incubation for 30 min. Cell nuclei were counterstained with Mayer's Hematoxylin prior to stepwise dehydration in an ethanol gradient. Images were acquired with the Aperio Scanscope AT Turbo (Leica Biosystems) with 20×/0.75 NA Plan Apo at ×20 magnification. The software Aperio ImageScope v.11 was used for image analysis and the free software ImageJ v.1.440 (NIH, USA) was used to quantify the intensity of the bands when validating the EphB4 antibody by immunoblotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were scanned at 20× magnification (Aperio Scanscope AT Turbo; Leica Biosystems Wetzlar, Germany using Perio eSlide Manager software version 12.3.3.5049, Leica Biosystems Wetzlar, Germany). Image analysis software (Aperio ImageScope version 12.3.2.8013, Leica Biosystems Wetzlar, Germany) was used to calibrate and measure the degree of staining within designated areas in the images. An algorithm was set for each antibody in order to minimize the detection of background positive staining. These measurements were used to calculate a positivity score using the formula positivity = (number of positive pixels)/(total number of pixels).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!