The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tecnai g20 electron microscope

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Tecnai G20 electron microscope is a high-performance transmission electron microscope (TEM) designed for materials science and life science research. It features a LaB6 electron source and advanced optics for high-resolution imaging and analytical capabilities. The Tecnai G20 is capable of providing detailed structural and compositional information about a wide range of samples at the nanoscale level.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using tecnai g20 electron microscope

1

Immunogold Labeling of AHNAK Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were fixed with 0.1% glutaraldehyde and 4% PFA in PBS for 1 hour. Fixative was removed by centrifugation and cells were washed twice in 0.05M glycine in PBS. After one wash in PBS, cells were permeabilized and blocked in 0.1% saponin and 5% goat serum for 30 min. Samples were then incubated with primary antibody against AHNAK (mouse monoclonal clone E5; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) diluted 1:50 in 10% goat serum for 1 hour at room temperature. Primary antibody was detected by anti-mouse secondary antibody, conjugated to Nanogold 1.4nm (Nanogold, Yaphank, NY, USA) diluted 1:50 in 10% goat serum for 1 hour. Gold Enhance EM Plus was used according to manufacturer's instructions to enlarged gold particle size. Non-immune serum served as negative controls. Results were analyzed in a FEI Tecnai G20 Electron microscope at 200kVA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Strain Marseille-P2645

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Different growth conditions were tested on a 5% sheep's blood–enriched Columbia agar (bioMérieux) for strain Marseille-P2645T. Five temperatures (room temperature, 28, 37, 45 and 55°C) and three atmospheres—anaerobic (anaeroGen Compact; Oxoid), microaerophilic (campyGen Compact; Oxoid) and aerobic (in a plastic pouch to maintain a humid atmosphere)—were evaluated. Tolerance of this strain to salt was tested using 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 15% and 20% of NaCl, and the pH tolerance (5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5 and 8) was also tested. Individual cells of strain Marseille-P2645T were visualized using a Tecnai G20 electron microscope (FEI Company, Limeil-Brevannes, France). Gram staining was performed and observed using a photonic microscope Leica DM2500 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a 100× oil-immersion objective. Motility testing was performed by observation of a fresh colony between the blades and slats using a DM1000 photonic microscope (Leica) at 40×. To check the ability to sporulate, strain Marseille-P2645T was grown on 5% sheep's blood–enriched Columbia agar (bioMérieux) for 2 days, and then a heat-shock test (20 minutes at 80°C) was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing HA and HA-Au Nanoparticle Uptake in hMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe the intracellular localization of HA and HA-Au in hMSCs, the hMSCs were cultured in six-well plate at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 hrs. After refreshing the culture medium containing 100 mg/mL of HA or HA-Au nanoparticles and incubating for 3 days, hMSCs were obtained and fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde overnight at 4°C. Then, the cells were post-fixed using 1% osmium tetraoxide for 1 hr at 4°C and then dehydrated stepwise using a series of ethanol concentrations (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%). Eventually, the cells were embedded in epoxy resin and sectioned with an ultramicrotome. Ultrathin sections were collected on copper grids to observe the uptake and intracellular distribution of nanoparticles using TEM (Tecnai G20 electron microscope, FEI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Ti3C2 Nanomaterial

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structure of Ti3C2 was examined using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, ZEISS Sigma 500, GER), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G20 electron microscope, FEI, USA), whereas the phase of Ti3C2 was examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8A25, Bruker, GER). The microscopic morphology and chemical compositions were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6510LV, JP). A spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadu, JP) was used to obtain the UV-vis-NIR absorption spectra. The chemical bonds of the coatings were measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) (Nicolet 570, USA). The chemical states were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Escalab 250Xi, USA) with Al Kα irradiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Structural and Compositional Analysis of HA and HA-Au Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscope (TEM; Tecnai G20 electron microscope, FEI, USA) was performed to determine the microstructure and the morphologies of the HA and HA-Au nanoparticles. X-ray powder diffractometry (XRD, D8A25, Bruker, Germany) was used to determine the crystallinity and purity of the nanoparticles. Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet IS10, USA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were used to measure the chemical compositions and chemical states of the nanoparticles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphologies of the samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Quanta 200; FEI, USA). The surface chemical compositions of the samples were determined via energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX, attached to the SEM). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments were performed on a Tecnai G20 electron microscope (FEI, USA) with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Carbon-coated copper grids were used as the sample holders. The crystalline structures of the samples were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD; D/MAX 2200; Rigaku, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at a 2θ scan rate of 4° min−1, 40 kV, 40 mA, ranging from 5° to 80°. The presence of functional groups in the samples was confirmed through Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Spectrum One; PerkinElmer, USA). The surface elemental composition analyses were conducted based on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Scientific-K-Alpha 1063; Thermo Fisher, UK) with an Al Kα monochromatic X-ray source, in which all of the binding energies were calibrated with reference to the C 1s peak (284.8 eV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrastructural Analysis of Cell Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown to 90% confluence before being washed, scraped, pelleted, and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) overnight. Samples were post fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h, stained in bloc with 0.5% uranyl acetate, rinsed, and dehydrated in graded ethanol. After immersion in propylene oxide, samples were embedded in epoxy resin (Spurr, Electron Microscopy Sciences, EMS, Hatfield PA, USA) and polymerized for 42 h at 75 °C. Ultrathin sections were stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate and examined in a FEI Tecnai G20 Electron microscope at 200 kVA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exfoliation and Characterization of BEGO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The exfoliation mixture was first centrifuged at 2500 rpm to remove large graphite particles and possible planktonic microorganisms, and then the supernatant was filtered through a 0.1 μm Durapore PVDF filter (Millipore Co.,). The remaining solid materials on the filter were washed with the following sequence: 18 MΩ water, 80% ethanol, 18 MΩ water, 1 N HCl, and 18 MΩ water again. The resulting materials called BEGO were re-suspended in 18 MΩ water for characterization. UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded using a Thermo GENESYS 10S UV-vis spectrophotometer. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was performed by using a Thermo-Nicolet FT-IR Avatar 370 spectrometer. XPS analysis was carried out by a Kratos Axis His spectrometer. Raman spectra were obtained by Raman Microscope with wavelength of 532 nm and a 100 × objective. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were generated on a VEECO Dimension 3100. Transition electron microscopy (TEM) and electron diffraction images were obtained using a FEI Tecnai G20 electron microscope. Samples for AFM and TEM imaging were prepared by drop-casting the dispersion onto freshly cleaved mica substrates and lacey carbon TEM grid, respectively, which were then air dried under ambient lab conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization and Ion Release of PDA@Au-HA Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples' structures were examined using transmission electron microscopy.
(TEM, Tecnai G20 electron microscope, FEI, USA). Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Scientific, USA) were used to analyze the chemical element components of NPs. Using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) at a wavenumber ranging from 500 to 4000 cm -1 , the functional group change of the samples was assessed. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) was used to determine the contents of Au, Ca and P at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 days. The PDA@Au-HA sample was dried and weighed, and 50 mg of sample was added to 25 mL (m/v = 2 mg/mL) of PBS solution. After incubation in a 37 •C constant-temperature water bath shaker for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days, and the superatant was removed by centrifugation. There were 3 parallel samples in each group. Since PBS contains phosphate and the concentration C0 of P in PBS is measured at the same time, C0 needs to be subtracted when calculating the release amount of P ions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Time-Resolved Microscopy of Viral Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used protocols similar to previous studies (Andreani et al., 2016 (link), 2017 (link)) for embedding and transmission electron microscopy. The only difference was the infection time points at which the samples were collected. The time points were 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 36h post-infection. Microscopy was performed using a Tecnai G20 electron microscope (FEI, Germany) operating at 200keV, and the size of the particles was measured using ImageJ.1
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!