The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using airyscan

1

Multimodal Imaging and Processing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were obtained using an Olympus Fluoview-Fv1000, Leica SP8X, Zeiss 700, Zeiss LSM 880 with Airyscan and Nikon Ti2-E confocal microscopes. All images were processed with Image J software (NIH) and the montage of figures were performed using Adobe Photoshop CC. Schemes were designed using Adobe Illustrator CS3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Embryo Imaging and Cell Counting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of embryos were taken using an AxioCam HRC camera on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope in DIC mode. High-resolution fluorescence images were taken using a Leica TCS-SP5-MP, a Zeiss LSM880 with AiryScan or a Nikon A1R confocal microscope. EMC number was counted from images taken on compound or confocal microscopes using ImageJ software as follows: (i) the image was loaded into ImageJ; (ii) ‘Cell counter’ was selected from ‘Analyze’ items on the Plugins menu; (iii) ‘Initialize’ was selected; and (iv) cell number was determined. All experimental values are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-tailed Student’s t-test with unequal variance was conducted in Microsoft Excel to compare experimental groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standardized Image Brightness Adjustment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For most of the Z-Stack images taken on the Zeiss LSM980 with AiryScan or Nikon N-SIM S microscopes and processed in ImageJ, each image was loaded into ImageJ and brightness and contrast were modulated solely by using the reset command (autoscale) on the brightness and contrast panel. This command restores the original brightness and contrast settings, setting the display range to the full pixel value of the image, and rendering processed images as similar as possible to native images. For certain images (listed in the relevant figures), the intensity values for each channel were matched to those of a previously “autoscaled” parasite using the SET command on FIJI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated on a glass-bottom cell culture Petri dish (NEST,801001) and grew for 24 h followed by fixation using 4% paraformaldehyde (Pierce™ 16% Formaldehyde ((w/v)), Methanol-free, ThermoFisher, 28906) in 1 × PBS for 20 min at room temperature. After washing three times in 1 × PBS, cells were blocked with 4% IgG-free Bovine Serum Albumin for 20 min at room temperature. Permeabilization of cells was performed with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, X100) in 1 × PBS for 10 min, followed by adding primary antibody 1:500 in 1 × PBS and incubating at 37 °C for 2 h. Cells were washed with 1 × PBS three times, followed by incubation with a secondary antibody 1:1000 in 1 × PBS for one hour. After washing three times, the nuclei were stained with 10 µg/ml DAPI (Beyotime). Images were acquired by a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, LSM 880 with Airyscan or Nikon A1 R) with a 100× objective. At least three different dishes were quantified per treatment type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Analysis of gp78 and NLRP3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were primed with LPS for 4 h, then fixed in 4% fixative solution (Solarbio) for 20 min and permeabilized with saponin (Beyotime) for 5 min. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Solarbio) for 1 h at room temperature, cells were incubated overnight with anti-gp78 and anti-NLRP3 antibodies [1:200 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% BSA] followed by staining with DyLight 488-labeled (Multisciences) and Alexa Fluor 555-labeled secondary antibodies (Abcam). Nuclei were co-stained with DAPI (Roche). Stained cells were viewed under a confocal fluorescence microscope (LSM 880 with AiryScan, Nikon A1R).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Mitochondrial-ER Contact Sites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mitochondrial structural network was detected by 200 nM Mitotracker Red and ER tracker Green (Cell Signaling Technology) in a culture medium at 37 °C for 30 min. Then, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 and then stained with other antibodies. Cells were imaged using a Zeiss 880 Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope with Airyscan and Nikon A1R N-SIM N-STORM Microscope. Acquired images for mitochondria morphology were analyzed16 (link). The colocalization indexes Pearson’s and Manders’ coefficients were calculated with the ImageJ colocalization analysis plugin according to previous articles86 (link),87 (link). MERCs were also reconstructed and analyzed via surface-surface contact site area tool by Imaris (Bitplane) followed the manufacturer instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Confocal Microscopy for Live Cell Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence imaging and live cell imaging were performed by confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 800 with Airyscan or a spinning disc confocal microscope (SDC) that was built around a Nikon Ti2 inverted microscope equipped with a Yokogawa CSU-W1 confocal spinning head). Specifically, the nuclear morphologies of individual cells and the cells in the transwell experiments were captured in the Zeiss LSM 800 with Airyscan. The live cell imaging and subsequent fluorescence imaging were performed using the SDC, and the image acquisition and processing were controlled by MetaMorph (Molecular Device) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!