The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using cd8a percp cy5

1

Dissecting Murine Lymphoid Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphoid cells from bone marrow, thymus and spleen were isolated from 8-week old mice. To reveal T cell progenitor subsets in the thymus, single cell suspensions were stained with conjugated antibodies, specific for CD3-FITC (Biolegend), CD4-APC, CD8a-PerCp-Cy5.5, CD25-PE, CD44-APCCy7 (Biolegend), TCRβ-Pacific Blue (Biolegend). To analyse lymphoid subsets in the spleen, single cell suspensions were stained with CD3-FITC, CD4-APC, CD8a-PerCp-Cy5.5, CD19-APCH7, CD45R(B220)-PacificBlue, IgD-PE (eBioscience), IgM-PECy7 (eBioscience). To define the B cell progenitor subsets, suspensions from the bone marrow were stained with IgD-FITC, CD25-PE, IgM-PECy7 (eBioscience), CD45R (B220)-PacificBlue, CD117 (cKit)-APC (eBioscience), CD19-APCH7. Dead cells were excluded from the analysis by propidium iodide staining. Antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen unless mentioned otherwise. Samples were measured on a FACS Fortessa® and analysed using FlowJo® software (Version: 10.0.8r1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PICV NP-specific CD8+ T cell analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected from mice in lithium-heparin tubes for peripheral blood monocyte (PBMC) preparation. PBMCs were isolated from whole blood using lymphoprep separation technique (Fisher, USA) followed by lysis of any remaining red-blood cells using the RBC lysis buffer (Thermo-Fisher, USA). Cells were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32 antibody (BD Biosciences, USA), and incubated with PE-labeled PICV NP(48-45)/H2K(b) MHC-I tetramer, provided by the NIH tetramer core facility at Emory University, together with CD8a-PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience, USA), CD3-APC (Biolegend, USA), Zombie violet stain (Biolegend, USA), for 30 min on ice in the dark. After washing, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry on a BD FACSCelesta Cell Analyzer machine (BD Biosciences, USA). Data was analyzed with the FlowJo software (FlowJo LLC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-1 FITC (1:300; J43; eBioscience), NK1.1 PE (1:300; PK136; eBioscience), CD3e PE-Dazzle594 (1:300; 145-2C11; BioLegend), CD3e PE (1:200; 145-2C11; eBioscience), FoxP3 PerCP-Cy5.5 (1:200; FJK-16s; eBioscience), CD8a PE-Cy7 (1:2000; 53-6.7; eBioscience), CD8a APC (1:600; 53-6.7; eBioscience), CD8a PerCP-Cy5.5 (1:400; 53-6.7; eBioscience), TCRb AF700 (1:100; H57-597; BioLegend), CD45 BV785 (1:1000; 30-F11; BioLegend), CD4 BV711 (1:400; GK1.5; BioLegend), CD19 BV650 (1:400; 6D5; BioLegend), CD19 PE (1:500; 1D3; eBioscience), CD11b BV605 (1:1000; M1/70; BioLegend), CD11b BV510 (1:400; M1/70; BioLegend), CD11c BV605 (1:400; N418; BioLegend), Siglec-F PE (1:300; E50-2440; BD Biosciences), F4/80 APC (1:200; BM8; BioLegend), Ly-6G AF 700 (1:300; 1A8; BioLegend), MHC II BV650 (1:4000; M5/114.15.2; BioLegend), CD64 BV421 (1:200; X54-5/7.1; BioLegend), TNF FITC (1:300; MP6-XT22; BioLegend), IFNg PE-Cy7 (1: 1000; XMG1.2; BD Biosciences), Eomes PE (1:200; W17001A; BioLegend), Ki-67 BV 650 (1:200, 11F6; Biolegend), GzmB FITC (1:100; GB11; BioLegend). Gating strategy is depicted in Supplementary Fig. 6d.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive B Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow of Myce and littermate wild‐type control were harvested into single‐cell suspension with red cell lysis and stained with CD19‐Pacific Blue (1D3, BD, NJ, USA), B220‐PE cy7 (RA3‐6B2, BD), CD24‐APC (M1/69, in house), IgM‐FITC (331.12, in house), CD43‐PE (S7, BD). Spleen red cell lysed single cell suspensions were stained with CD19‐BB700 (1D3, BD), B220‐APC (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA), CD23‐PE cy7 (B3B4, Thermo Fisher), CD21‐BV421 (7E9, BioLegend, San Diego, USA), CD138‐PE (281–2, BD). The peritoneal cavity wash was stained with CD19‐PE (ID2, in house), B220‐APC (RA3‐6B2, Thermo Fisher), CD23‐PE cy7 (B3B4, Thermo Fisher), CD5‐BB700 (53–7.3, BD), CD11b‐eFlour450 (M1/70, Thermo Fisher). Lymph node and thymus of single cell suspensions were stained with CD19‐BUV395 (1D3, BD), (TCRβ‐PE (H57‐597, BD), CD4‐BV421 (GK1.5, BioLegend) and CD8a‐PerCp/Cy5.5 (53–6.7, eBioscience, San Diego, USA). Flow cytometry analysis was performed on a BD LSRFortessa X‐20 analyzer (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Immune Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used were as follows: CD56 BV421, CD3 PE-Cy7 or APC-Cy7, CD14 APC-Cy7, CD19 APC-Cy7, CD57 Pacific Blue or FITC, CD62L PE-Cy7, CD107a PE-Cy7, CD244 PE-Cy5.5, Perforin Pacific blue, CD160 Alexa Fluor 647 (Biolegend), CD16 eFluor450 or FITC, CD69 FITC, CD94 FITC, CD8a PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience), CD161 PE or APC, CD56 APC, IFNγ FITC, NKp30 APC, NKp46 APC, NKp80 APC (Miltenyi Biotec), CD3 Pacific Orange, CD4 Qdot 605, Granzyme B APC (Invitrogen), NKG2C Alexa Fluor 488 or PE, NKG2D PE, PLZF APC, Granzyme A FITC (R&D Systems), CD56 FITC or PE-Cy7, CD85j FITC, IFNγ Alexa Fluor 700, Ki67 FITC (BD Biosciences), Granzyme K FITC (Immunotools), NKG2A PE, NKp44 PE, CD158e1/e2 PE (Beckman Coulter), Phosphatidylserine Alexa Fluor 488 (Merck Milipore). The viability dye Live/Dead fixable Near-IR (Invitrogen) was used in all experiments. Anti-KLRG1 FITC was kindly provided by H. Pircher. Data were acquired on LSRII (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo (Treestar, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterizing T Cell Subsets by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysed cells were acquired and subsequently stained for 30 min at 4 °C with the following fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies: CD3-PE (Bio- Legend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD4-APC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), CD8a-Percp/Cy5.5 (eBioscience), CD45RO-FITC (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and CCR7-APC/Cy7 (BioLegend). The T cell subsets were defined as previous study reported [10 (link)]: Naive T cells being CCR7+ and CD45RO; central memory T cells as CD45RO+ and CCR7+; effector memory T cells as CD45RO+ and CCR7, and effector memory RA (EMRA) T cells as CD45RO and CCR7 (Figure S1). A total of 200,000 events were acquired by the BD LSRFortessa™ flow cytometer (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). The data analysis was carried out with Flowjo v10.1 Software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). The absolute number of each T cell subset was calculated as follows: (percentage of each cell population among total lymphocytes) × (total lymphocytes count)/100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiparameter Phenotyping of Mouse Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood and spleen samples were treated with Red Blood Cell Lysis Solution (Qiagen) for 15 min at 37°C and 3 min at room temperature, respectively, before staining. LIVE/DEAD Aqua fluorescent stain (Invitrogen) was used to discriminate between live and dead cells. For tetramer staining, samples were incubated with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated SIINFEKL-H-2kb multimers (TC Metrix, Switzerland) for 35 min at room temperature. Samples were washed and incubated on ice for 30 min with CD8α-PerCp Cy5.5 (clone 53.6.7–eBioscience), CD3–PE Cy7 (clone 145.2C11–eBioscience), CD4–FITC (clone GK1.5–produced in house, Ludwig Cancer Research). For in vitro binding and chemotaxis assays the following antibodies were used: IgG1–PE (clone A85-1–BD biosciences), B220–Pacific blue (clone RA3-6B2 - LICR), CD8a–PerCp Cy5.5 (clone 53.6.7–eBioscience), CD3–PE Cy7 (clone 145.2C11–eBioscience), CD11c–eFLuor 660 (clone N4/18–eBioscience), CD11b–Alexa700 (clone M1/70–eBioscience), CD103–PE. Data were acquired on a LSRII or LSRII (SORP) and FACS analyses were done with Flow Jo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunophenotyping of T-Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the day of blood drawing, blood samples mixed with heparin anticoagulant were lysed with red blood cell lysis solution and 0.1 mM EDTA and prepared for flow cytometry analysis with the following fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies: CD3-PE (Bio- Legend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD4-APC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), CD8a-Percp/Cy5.5 (eBioscience), CD45RO-FITC (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), and CCR7-APC/Cy7 (BioLegend). The relative expression of CD45RO and CCR7 was used to identify naïve T cell (TNaïve, CD45RO CCR7+), central memory T cell (TCM, CD45RO+ CCR7+), effector memory T cell (TEM, CD45RO+ CCR7), and T effector memory CD45RA cell (TEMRA, CD45RO CCR7) subsets of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. These markers were selected according to previous studies (7 (link), 17 (link)). The immunophenotyping methods and gating strategy have been elaborated in the supplementary materials (Figure S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive T Cell Subset Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysed cells were acquired and subsequently stained for 30 min at 4 °C with the following uoresceinconjugated monoclonal antibodies: CD3-PE (Bio-Legend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD4-APC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), CD8a-Percp/Cy5.5 (eBioscience), CD45RO-FITC (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and CCR7-APC/Cy7 (BioLegend). The T cell subsets were de ned as previous study reported [10] : Naive T cells being CCR7 + and CD45RO -; central memory T cells as CD45RO + and CCR7 + ; effector memory T cells as CD45RO + and CCR7 -, and effector memory RA (EMRA) T cells as CD45RO -and CCR7 -(Figure S1). A total of 200,000 events were acquired by the BD LSRFortessa™ ow cytometer (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). The data analysis was carried out with Flowjo v10.1 Software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). The absolute number of each T cell subset was calculated as follows: (percentage of each cell population among total lymphocytes)×(total lymphocytes count)/100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive T Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood cells were obtained at the time of recruitment. PBMCs were isolated by gradient centrifugation and resuspend by staining buffer. T cells stained by CD3-PE (BioLegend) were separated into CD4 + and CD8 + T cells as determined by CD4-APC and CD8a-PerCP/Cy5.5 (eBioscience). CD45RO-FITC (Miltenyi Biotec) and CCR7-APC/Cy7 (BioLegend) was further used to analyze T cell differentiation: NAIVE subset (CCR7 + CD45RA + ), CM subset (CCR7 + CD45RA-), EM subset (CCR7-CD45RA-), and EMRA subset (CCR7-CD45RA + ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!