The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ua 6 absorbance detector

Manufactured by Teledyne
Sourced in United States

The UA-6 absorbance detector is a laboratory instrument designed to measure the absorbance of light by a sample. It is a core component used in various analytical techniques, such as spectrophotometry, to determine the concentration or properties of a substance within a sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using ua 6 absorbance detector

1

Polysome Profiling of Cycloheximide-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatment of 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich-Aldrich) for 5 min, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS containing 100 μg/ml cycloheximide and solubilized by polysome lysis buffer (15 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 15 mM MgCl2, 250 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 100 μg/ml cycloheximide, 400 U/ml RNAseOut (Invitrogen), protease inhibitors). Lysates were centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000 rpm at 4°C. Cell lysates containing the same amount of total RNAs were loaded onto 20% to 50% sucrose gradient generated by Gradient Station (Biocomp). Tubes were centrifuged at 36,000 rpm for 2 hr at 4°C on SW40Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter). After centrifugation, fractions were collected using Foxy JR Fraction Collector and UA-6 Absorbance Detector (Teledyne Isco). RNA was extracted using TurboCapture 96 mRNA Kit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). mRNA levels in the resulting cDNA were analyzed by qPCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polysome Profiling of SW480 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates of SW480 were prepared in polysome profiling buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH7.6), 125 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and DEPC water) for sucrose gradient centrifugation. Extracts were incubated on ice for 15 min, and the insoluble material was pelleted by centrifugation at 13000 rpm for 15 min. The resulting supernatant extracts were then loaded onto a 17.5–50% sucrose gradient prepared with polysome profiling buffer and ultra-centrifuged for 2.4 h at 35,000 rpm in an SW41-Ti rotor (Beckman, Brea, CA, USA). Post centrifugation, the gradients were fractionated using a fraction collector (Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and their quality was monitored at 253 nm using a UA-6 absorbance detector (Isco, Lincoln, NE, USA). Total RNA was extracted from each fraction using TriZol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Polysome profiling of transfected HEK293T cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were transfected as described above. At 48 h post transfection, cells were treated with 150 µg/ml of cycloheximide before lysis in a polysome lysis buffer (20 mM Hepes pH 7.6, 2 mM MgCl2, 150 mM KCl, 0.5% Nonidet P40, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 100 U/ml RNasin (Promega, South Hampton, UK)), 150 µg/ml cycloheximide, 1× protease inhibitor (Sigma Aldrich, Dorset, UK) and 1× Halt phosphatase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK). The KCl concentration of the lysates was adjusted before being loaded onto a 10-ml linear sucrose gradient (10–50%) containing 20 mM Hepes pH7.6, 2 mM MgCl2, 250 mM KCl, 0.5% Nonidet p40, 2.5 mM DTT and 0.5 µg/ml heparin. Gradients were centrifuged for 120 min at 4°C in a Beckman SW41 Rotor at 181 781g. Following centrifugation, 10 fractions of 1 ml were collected from the gradient with a KD Scientific peristaltic pump (Holliston, MA, USA) and a Foxy Jr® fraction collector (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, NE, USA). Absorption traces were recorded with a UA6 Absorbance Detector with an A254 filter (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, NE, USA). Fractions 1–2 and 6–10 were pooled, respectively, for luciferase RNA analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Polysome Profiles in Mammalian Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates of HEK293T and A549 cells for sucrose gradient centrifugation were prepared in polysome extraction buffer (20 mM HEPES at pH 7.6, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 100 μg/ml cycloheximide, 100 U/ml RNAse inhibitor [Thermo Scientific] and Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail [Thermo Scientific]). Extracts were incubated on ice for 20 min, and insoluble material was pelleted by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 10 min. The resulting supernatant extracts were loaded onto a 10–50% (w/v) sucrose gradient and ultracentrifuged at 30000 rpm for 3 hours at 4 °C in a Surespin 630 rotor (Sorvall). Following centrifugation, the gradients were fractionated using a fraction collector (Brandel), and their quality was monitored at 254 nm using a UA-6 Absorbance Detector (Isco). Proteins from sucrose gradient fractions were precipitated with 10% (v/v) TCA, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membranes for immunoblotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Polysomal Profiling of Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T, MCF7, or MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded at 80% confluency for experiments. Cells were lysed on ice in freshly prepared buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1.25 mM MgCl2, 1% NP-40, 1 mM DTT, 8 U/ml RNase Out, and protease inhibitors, pH 7.4). Lysates were centrifuged and supernatant quantified for RNA content at 260 nm using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). Supernatants were loaded onto a 15–50% sucrose gradient, and ultracentrifugation was performed using an Optima L-90K ultracentrifuge and SW 41Ti rotor (Beckman) at 234,326 × g for 2.5 h at 4°C. Samples were then fractionated using a Foxy R1 Fraction Collector (Brandel) and UA-6 Absorbance Detector (ISCO). For analysis, proteins were precipitated from fractions using chloroform/methanol and dried in vacuo. Pellets were resuspended in water and analyzed by Western blotting. For coimmunoprecipitation using pooled pretranslational fractions, samples were diluted 1:5 in lysis buffer and the aforementioned coimmunoprecipitation protocol was followed. For quantification of polysomal to pretranslational fractions, profiles were first traced above background using Adobe Illustrator. For comparison, pixels for each section were quantified via histogram densitometry (Adobe Photoshop).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cytoplasmic Lysate Preparation and Polysome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cytoplasmic lysates were prepared from cells in hypotonic lysis buffer, as follows: 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5; AM9850G; Ambion), 150 mM KCl (9640G; Ambion), 15 mM MgCl2 (AM9530G; Ambion), 1 mM dithiothreitol (10197777001; Ambion), 1% NP-40 (28324; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (11836170001; Sigma-Aldrich), 100 U/ml SUPERase•In RNase Inhibitor (AM2694; Ambion), 25 U/ml TURBO DNase (AM2238; Ambion), and cOmplete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor (11836170001; Sigma-Aldrich) in nuclease-free water. Nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 13,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. Cytoplasmic lysates were layered onto a linear sucrose gradient (15–60% sucrose; #S5-12; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and centrifuged in an SW 41 Ti rotor (Beckman) for 2 h at 35,000 rpm at 4°C. Fractions were collected by an Auto-Densi Flow pump attached to a Foxy R1 fraction collector. Continuous absorbance at 254 nm was read using a UA-6 Absorbance Detector (Teledyne ISCO) to obtain polysome traces.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fractionation and Analysis of Yeast Polyribosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fractionation of polyribosomes was done essentially as described before (9 (link),10 (link)) using 10–50% (17 000 rpm., 18 h) and/or 10–30% (20 000 rpm., 18 h) sucrose gradients and a Beckman SW32.1 rotor. All procedures were performed at 4°C. Yeast cells from 50 ml of log phase culture were pelleted, treated for 10 min with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide and repelleted. Cell extracts were made by glass bead cell disruption (3–5 cycles of 1 min each), with intermittent cooling on ice. The following buffer was used: 100 mM KCl, 2.5 mM magnesium acetate, 20 mM HEPES·KOH, pH 7.4, 14.4 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 μg/ml cycloheximide. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 8 min and polyribosomes were resolved by sucrose density gradient centrifugation as indicated. Gradients were collected using the ISCO Programmable Density Gradient System with continuous monitoring at 254 nm using an ISCO UA-6 absorbance detector. Analysis of ratios of 80S monosomes to polyribosomes was done essentially as before (10 (link)). Fractionation of cell extracts using formaldehyde cross-linking was done as described by Nielsen et al. (18 (link)). For western blotting, proteins collected from sucrose gradient fractions were solubilized in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide sample buffer for 10 min at 95°C, chilled on ice for 5 min and loaded onto polyacrylamide gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Polysome Profiling of Mouse Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The polysome analysis was patterned on the method of Zhao et al. (32 (link)). Sucrose density gradients were prepared using five layers of buffered sucrose (50 mm Tris, 50 mm ammonium acetate, 12 mm MgCl2, pH 7.0, and either 7%, 21%, 33%, 47%, or 60% sucrose). 1 ml of each mixture was placed in a centrifuge tube from high density (60%) at the bottom to low density (7%) at the top. This step gradient was stored at 4 °C overnight to allow formation of a continuous gradient. The next morning, flash-frozen liver tissue was homogenized in lysis buffer (15 mm MgCl2, 200 mm KCl, 1% Triton x-100, 100 μg/ml cycloheximide, 2 mm DTT, 0.1% diethyl pyrocarbonate, pH 7.4) at 6 m/s for 60 s in a MP-Biomedicals FastPrep®-24. The homogenate was centrifuged to clarify (14,000 g, 5 min, 4 °C). Approximately 1.2 mg of total protein were loaded onto each gradient. The sample was then separated within the sucrose gradient using high speed centrifugation (99,526 g, 4 h, 4 °C) in a Beckman Coulter Optima™ l-100 XP. Polysomes were analyzed using an Isco UA-6 Absorbance Detector at 254 nm. Six mice from AL and six from DR were run in duplicate for assessment of polysome profiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Aspirin-induced Ribosome Profiling in NCM460 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NCM460 cells were treated with 1.5 mM aspirin for 24 hours. At 70% of confluence, cells were treated with 100 μg/ml Cycloheximide (CHX) for 15 min. Cells were washed twice on ice in PBS + 100 μg/ml CHX, then resuspendend in a LSB buffer [20 mM Tris HCl, 10 μM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 100 μg/ml CHX, 0.04 U/μl RiboLock RNAsi inhibitor (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland)] and lysate on ice for 10 min adding a detergent buffer [0.3% Triton N101 50 mM Sucrose, 100 μg/ml CHX, 0.04 U/μl RiboLock RNAsi inhibitor (Thermo Scientific)]. The lysate was centrifuged at 14000 rcf for 10 min at 4°C. Ribosomes were then separated on chilled 15%–50% Sucrose Gradient (in LSB buffer by ultracentrifugation at 160000 × g for 2 hours at 4°C). The polysome profile was monitored at 254 nm (0.2 O.D. sensibility) and fractionated (at 10×, 10% Tris-Pump power) using an ISCO gradient fractionator system interfaced to an UA-6 absorbance detector (Teledyne Isco, Lincon, NE, USA). The data collected were digitally converted by using Minilab 1008 (Measuring Computing, Norton, MA, USA) and TracedDaq software (Measuring Computing, Norton, MA, USA), acquiring data in a differential mode at +/− 4 V and 4Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Polysome Isolation and Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polysomes were isolated by the method described by Yang et al. [73 (link)]. Briefly, about 1 g of pulverized NB or SR86 shoots in liquid nitrogen was transferred to a 15-mL nuclease-free centrifuge tube with 5 mL ice-cold polysome extraction buffer (PEB) [100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 40 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 2% (V/V) polyoxyethylene-10-tridecyl ether, 0.2% (W/V) deoxycholic acid, 1 mM DTT, 100 μg mL− 1 cycloheximide and 10 U mL− 1 DNaseI] and mixed well. The suspension was then centrifuged at 4 °C with a speed of 5000 g for 10 min, followed by another 20,000 g centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min in a new 15-mL tube. The supernatant was subjected to polysome profile analysis and RPF isolation.
To perform profile analysis, the isolated polysome sample was loaded on a 15–60% (W/V) sucrose gradient in a polypropylene centrifuge tube (13 × 51 mm, BECKMAN, USA) and then centrifuged in a SW-55 rotor (BECKMAN, USA) at 4 °C with a speed of 170,000 g for 1.5 h. Fractionation, absorbance assay and data acquisition of the resulting gradient were carried out using a gradient fractionator system (BRANDEL, USA) with a UA-6 absorbance detector (TELEDYNE ISCO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!