The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mouse anti brp nc82

Sourced in United States, Cameroon

Mouse anti-Brp (nc82) is a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the Bruchpilot (Brp) protein in Drosophila melanogaster. The Brp protein is a crucial component of the active zone, a specialized region in the presynaptic terminal of neurons where neurotransmitter release occurs. This antibody can be used to visualize and study the organization and structure of active zones in Drosophila.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using mouse anti brp nc82

1

Dissection and Immunostaining of Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junctions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wandering third-instar larvae were dissected, internal organs removed and stretched with insect pins in ice-cold 0-mM Ca2+ Haemolymph-like saline (HL3) as previously described58 (link). Larvae were fixed for 10 min with ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS solution59 (link) or 3 min in ice-cold methanol for GluRIIA staining, incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4 °C and incubated with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Primary antibodies were used in the following concentrations: mouse anti-Dlg 1:500 (ref. 55 (link)), rabbit anti-Synaptotagmin 1:2,000 (ref. 60 (link)), rabbit anti-DGluRIIC 1:2,000 (ref. 16 (link)), mouse anti-Brp (Nc82) 1:250, mouse anti-GluRIIA 1:250 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, USA), rabbit anti-Fur1 1:500 (ref. 37 (link)) and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) 1:250 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.). Secondary antibodies were used in the following concentrations: Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse 1:500, Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit 1:500, Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse 1:500 and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit 1:500 (Amersham Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescent Immunolabeling of Drosophila Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dissection and antibody labeling was performed as described previously [80 (link)]. Briefly, flies were incubated in 4% PFA + 0.2% Triton-X 100 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 3.5 hours at 4°C and then washed for 3 × 30 minutes in PBS + 0.2% Triton-X 100 at room temperature prior to brain dissection. Dissected brains were incubated in primary antibodies for 2 to 5 days and in secondary antibodies for 2 days at 4°C. Afterwards, brains were washed for at least 3 × 30 minutes. The following antibodies were used in this study: rabbit anti-GFP (A6455, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) (1:1,000); rabbit anti-Dlg [81 (link)] (1:30,000); rat anti-CD8a (MCD0800, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) (1:500); mouse anti-Brp (nc82, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, Iowa) (1:200); rabbit anti-dsRed (632496, Takara, Kyoto, Japan) (1:500); mouse anti-V5 (960–25, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) (1:500); and Alexa488, 568, and 647 coupled secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) (1:1,000). Brains were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 700 laser scanning confocal microscope with a 25× (NA 0.8) or 40× (NA 1.3) oil immersion objective (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Images were processed using Imaris (Bitplane AG, Imaris.oxinst.com/">www.Imaris.oxinst.com) and Adobe Photoshop software (Adobe; www.adobe.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunostaining of Drosophila Larval Muscles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male larval body wall muscle preparations were stained as described previously12 (link)41 (link) for CAC1 immunostaining we proceed as described in ref. 31 (link). Primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-glutamate receptor III (GLURIII) (1:200) (kindly provided by Dr. Tobias Rasse and Dr. David Featherstone), rabbit anti- glutamate receptor IIB (GLURIIB) (1:300, gently provided by Dr. David Featherstone), mouse anti GLURIIA (8B4D2, 1:800, C. Goodman) and mouse anti-Brp (nc82; 1:200, E. Buchner) purchased from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank; Cy-5 conjugated anti-HRP and HRP- or fluorescent-coupled secondary antibodies (1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and mouse anti-GFP 3E6 (1:200, Invitrogen, West Grove, PA). After immunocytochemical procedures samples were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images were captured using a confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000), deconvolved using Huygens Software (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, The Netherlands) and quantified using ImageJ (U. S. National Institutes of Health). Data was collected in Excel (Microsoft) to be processed. Each data point corresponds to the average quantification of the clusters of at least three boutons from two pictures per larva. The number of data corresponds to the number of larvae imaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Second and third instar wandering Larvae were dissected in ice-cold dissecting saline (HL3) at room temperature and fixed for 5 min in Bouin’s fixative (Sigma Aldrich). Third instar larvae were incubated with primary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature in phosphate buffered saline containing 0.1% Triton X-100. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-Brp (nc82, 1:250), mouse anti-Futsch (22C10, 1:500), mouse anti-Fas II (1D4, 1:60) (all Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa); rabbit anti-GluRIIc (1:3000; Pielage et al., 2011 (link)); rabbit anti-Ank2-XL (1:2000; Koch et al., 2008 (link)); rat anti-Ank2-L (1:40; Enneking et al., 2013 (link)). For second instar larvae primary antibodies were applied overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibodies (Alexa-coupled) were used at 1:1000 for 1 h at room temperature. Conjugated anti-HRP (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories) were used at 1:500 together with the secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Larvae were mounted on slides using Prolong Gold antifade reagent.
Images were acquired at room temperature using a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope with a 63 × 1.4 NA oil objective using Zen 2010 software (Zeiss). Calibrated confocal images were used for all quantitative Intensity, diameter and FasII cluster per area measurements and analyzed using FIJI/IMAGEJ and Microsoft Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemistry of Drosophila Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brains were dissected in ice-cold Ringer’s solution, washed, and fixed in fresh fixative solution (4% paraformaldehyde, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 M Pipes, pH 7.2) for 20 min at room temperature with gentle agitation. Fixed tissues were analyzed by immunostaining and microscopy. Immunostaining was performed using fluorescent secondary antibodies essentially as described earlier (Lyalin et al., 2006 (link)). The following primary antibodies and corresponding dilutions were used for immunostaining: mouse anti-GFP 8H11 (1:100), anti-Repo 8D12 (1:10), rat anti-Elav 7E8A10 (1:10), mouse anti-Brp nc82 (1:10), all from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank; rabbit anti-GFP from Invitrogen (1:800), rat anti-HA from Roche (1:1000), rat anti-Dpn from Abcam (1:500). The following secondary antibodies were used: goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 546 and 488 (1:250), all from Invitrogen; donkey anti-mouse and anti-rabbit Cy3 (1:250) and FITC (1:150), from Jackson Laboratories. Stained samples were mounted on slides in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) and imaged using Zeiss Axio Imager M2 fluorescence microscope with ApoTome module for optical sectioning or Zeiss 510 META Confocal microscope. Images were processed using Zeiss Zen and ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visualizing Drosophila Neural Circuits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male flies expressing GFP in MBON-α3 were fixed for 3.5h at 4 • C in 4% PFA containing PBST (0.2% Triton-X100). Flies were then washed for at least 3 x 30 min at RT in PBST before dissection. Dissected brains were then labelled with primary antibodies (rabbit anti-GFP (A6455, Life technologies, 1:2000) and mouse anti-Brp nc82, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa, 1:200) for two nights at 4 • C. After incubation, brains were washed at least 6 x 30 min in PBST. Secondary antibodies (Alexa488 (goatαrabbit) and Alexa568 (goatαmouse) coupled antibodies, Life technologies, 1:1000) were applied for two nights at 4 • C. After a repeated washing period, brains were submerged in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories), mounted onto microscope slides and stored at 4 • C.
Images were acquired using a confocal scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 710) and a 25x (Zeiss Plan-NEOFLUAR, NA 0.8 Korr DIC) oil objective. Raw images were projected with Fiji [73] and cropped in Photoshop (Adobe). Uniform adjustments of brightness and contrast were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunostaining of Drosophila Larval NMJs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An immunostaining experiment is detailed in Figure 4. Procedures match those previously published (Brusich et al., 2015 (link), 2018 (link); Spring et al., 2016 (link); Yeates et al., 2017 (link); James et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, third instar larvae were filleted and fixed for 5 min with Bouins fixative (Ricca Chemical, Arlington, TX, USA). After washes, fixed fillets were incubated in primary antibodies overnight at 4C, mouse anti-Brp (nc82, 1:250, University of Iowa Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank; Wagh et al., 2006 (link)) and rabbit anti-Dlg (1:5,000; Budnik et al., 1996 (link)). After washes, fillets were incubated in fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies overnight at 4C (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA, USA), goat anti-mouse-488 (DyLight, 1:1,000) and goat anti-rabbit-549 (DyLight, 1:2,000). After washes, fillets were mounted and Dlg boutons were counted blinded by hand on an epifluorescence microscope and double checked for Brp signal in apposition. Note: relative bouton numbers between NMJs 6/7 on segment A2 and A3 are consistent with earlier studies, though some raw numbers appear slightly lower, which may be due either to hand counting (rather than automated) or due to Dlg signal bouton counting (rather than HRP signal counting).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!