The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Efluor 570

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

EFluor 570 is a fluorescent dye used for cell labeling and tracking applications in flow cytometry and other fluorescence-based techniques. It is a stable, cell-permeable dye that can be used to stain live cells without affecting their viability or function.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using efluor 570

1

Visualizing Podocyte Actin Cytoskeleton

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Podocytes were seeded on sterile cover slips in the 6-well plate and infected with or without UCH-L1 overexpression adenoviral vector for 48 h. After washing with PBS, the podocytes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100-PBS for 15 min, and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature. F-actin was stained with phalloidin eFluor® 570 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. After being countmounted with DAPI-containing mounting solution, the slides were examined with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus). Image J software was used for post-processing of the images, including merging and colocalization analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Renal Immune Complex and Macrophage Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Renal immune complex deposition levels were observed using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Following deparaffinization, rehydration, and antigen retrieval, the slides were blocked with 2.5% normal horse serum, washed, and incubated with ImmPRESS Anti-Mouse IgG (Vector MP-7802). Antibody binding was visualized by incubating slides in a DAB working solution (Vector MP-7802). The slides were imaged using an Olympus BX51 light Microscope (Tokyo, Japan). The staining levels (arbitrary gray units) of 30 glomeruli per slide were quantified using ImageJ (Version 1.52a, NIH, USA). A second series of slides, for illustration purposes only, were counterstained with hematoxylin and incubated in bluing reagent.
Renal macrophage infiltration levels were evaluated through immunofluorescence (IF). Kidney sections were blocked by 10% (v/v) goat serum, followed by incubation under rat anti-mouse F4/80 monoclonal antibody eFluor 570 (eBioscience; 41–4801-82;). Subsequently, coverslips were mounted with Prolong Antifade Mountant (Life Technologies, USA). The macrophage infiltration levels were assessed by counting positively stained macrophages from 50 glomeruli per slide under an Olympus BX51 Fluorescence Motorized Microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing Renal Immune Complexes and Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Renal immune complex deposition was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC), as described previously.21 (link) The slides were visualized using an Olympus BX51 light microscope (Tokyo, Japan). Thirty glomeruli per slide were analyzed for the staining levels (arbitrary gray units) using ImageJ software (Version 1.52, NIH).
Renal macrophage infiltration levels were assessed by immunofluorescent staining (IF).21 (link) In brief, kidney slides were blocked and then incubated with rat anti-mouse F4/80 antibody eFluor 570 (eBioscience). Thirty glomeruli per slide were investigated to count positively stained macrophages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Renal Immune Complex and Macrophage Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The renal immune complex deposition was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). For IHC examination, deparaffinized kidney sections were steamed for 10 minutes in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer using a steamer. Sections were then brought to room temperature and rinsed in a washing buffer (PBS, 0.5% Tween 20). After antigen retrieval, samples were blocked with 2.5% normal goat serum and then stained with ImmPRESS anti-mouse IgG (Vector MP-7802). The staining was visualized using a DAB working solution (Vector MP-7802). The staining levels (arbitrary gray units) were quantified using ImageJ software (Version 1.52, NIH).
Renal macrophage infiltration was assessed by immunofluorescent staining (IF). Following deparaffinization and antigen retrieval, the sections were blocked and incubated with rat anti-mouse F4/80 antibody eFluor 570 (eBioscience, Inc.). Thirty glomeruli per slide were investigated to count positively stained macrophages using an Olympus BX51 Fluorescence Microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of M2 Macrophages in RAW264.7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1×10 6 unstimulated RAW264.7 macrophages (non-IL-4 group) and IL-4-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages (IL-4 group) were collected and washed with ow cytometry staining buffer. After centrifugation at 1500×g for 5 minutes, two groups of macrophages were dyed with PE rat anti-mouse F4/80 (eFluor 570, #41-4801-80, invitrogen, 1:50 dilution) at 4℃in the dark for least 30 minutes. After washing with ow cytometry staining buffer and centrifugation, macrophages were dealt with reagent A of xation & permeabilization kit (#70-GAS003, MULTI SCIENCES (LIANKE) BIOTECH, China) at RT in the dark for 15 minutes. After centrifugation, macrophages were incubated with rabbit anti-mouse CD206 (Alexa Fluor® 488, #ab195191, Abcam, USA), which was diluted in reagent B of xation & permeabilization kit. After washing and centrifugation, macrophages were resuspended in ow cytometry staining buffer and ltered with 70 µm cellular lter before testing. Macrophages were examined using a ow cytometer (BD FACSCanto , BD Biosciences). Percentages of F4/80 + CD206 + M2 macrophages were analyzed in FlowJo V10 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of M2 Macrophages in RAW264.7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1×10 6 unstimulated RAW264.7 macrophages (non-IL-4 group) and IL-4-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages (IL-4 group) were collected and washed with ow cytometry staining buffer. After centrifugation at 1500×g for 5 minutes, two groups of macrophages were dyed with PE rat anti-mouse F4/80 (eFluor 570, #41-4801-80, invitrogen, 1:50 dilution) at 4℃in the dark for least 30 minutes. After washing with ow cytometry staining buffer and centrifugation, macrophages were dealt with reagent A of xation & permeabilization kit (#70-GAS003, MULTI SCIENCES (LIANKE) BIOTECH, China) at RT in the dark for 15 minutes. After centrifugation, macrophages were incubated with rabbit anti-mouse CD206 (Alexa Fluor® 488, #ab195191, Abcam, USA), which was diluted in reagent B of xation & permeabilization kit. After washing and centrifugation, macrophages were resuspended in ow cytometry staining buffer and ltered with 70 µm cellular lter before testing. Macrophages were examined using a ow cytometer (BD FACSCanto , BD Biosciences). Percentages of F4/80 + CD206 + M2 macrophages were analyzed in FlowJo V10 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!