The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Q5 high fidelity dna polymerase

Manufactured by New England Biolabs
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, China, France, Canada, Australia

Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase is a thermostable DNA polymerase with high fidelity and robust performance. It possesses 3'->5' exonuclease activity for proofreading, enabling accurate DNA synthesis with low error rates.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

1 075 protocols using q5 high fidelity dna polymerase

1

Scalable DNA Library Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the assembly of 509 sequences, the oligo pool was synthesized and the lyophilized pool consisted of 11,776 oligos of 192 nts (synthesized by Twist Bioscience), which included the 152 nts payload in each oligo. The pool was resuspended in 1× TE buffer for a final concentration of 2 ng/μL. One of the files, 509 oligos, was flanked by binding sites for the premixed primers F02/R02. PCR was performed using Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerases (NEB #M0491) and primers F01-F04/R01-F04 (10 ng oligos, 2.5 μL of each primer mix (100 mM), 0.5 μL Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase, 4 μL 2.5 mM dNTPs in a 50 μL reaction). Thermocycling conditions were as follows: 5 min at 98 °C; 10 cycles of: 10 s at 98 °C, 30 s at 56 °C, 30 s at 72 °C, followed by a 5 min extension at 72 °C. The library was then purified using Plus DNA Clean/Extraction Kit (GMbiolab Co, Ltd. #DP034P) and eluted in 40 μL ddH2O. This library was considered the master pool and run on a 2% agarose gel to verify the correct size. For the assembly of 11520 sequences, the synthetic DNA pool consisted of 11520 oligos of 200 nts (synthesized by Twist Bioscience), which included the 155 nts payload flanked by binding sites for the primers F1/R1 (Supplementary Fig. 3). The lyophilized pool was rehydrated in 1× TE buffer and the above protocol was used to amplify the file.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Broad-host Shuttle-vector Cloning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The broad-host shuttle-vector system pMTL80000 (Heap et al., 2009 (link)) was used for all cloning steps. All generated plasmids of this study (Supplementary Table 1) were cloned with restriction endonucleases and T4 ligase (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) or Gibson assembly (NEBuilder® HiFi DNA Assembly, New England Biolabs, Frankfurt am Main, Germany). PCR work was carried out with primers provided by IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies, Iowa, United States) (Supplementary Table 2) and with a proof-reading Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt am Main, Germany)) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was purified from 2 mL of exponential cultures of C. ljungdahlii with the NucleoSpin Tissue Mini kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and used as PCR-template. Notably, instead of performing harsh cell disruption according to the manufacturer’s recommendation, we applied a 6 × 10 s vortex interval during the procedure. All PCR steps were performed with Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and primers provided by IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies, Iowa, United States) (Supplementary Table 2). PCR products were purified with QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Constructing Luciferase-Based HTLV-1 LTR Reporters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To construct luciferase-based reporter plasmids containing observed mutations in LTR regulatory elements, an overlap extension PCR was used to amplify each particular LTR variant. The first round of PCR allowed for the amplification of two sequences encompassing the LTR: a 5’-end fragment of 979 bp and 3’-end fragment of 571 bp were generated using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase and Q5 Reaction Buffer (New England BioLabs, MA, USA) at the following thermal conditions: 30 s at 98 °C, 40 cycles (10 s at 98 °C, 45 s at 65 °C (5’-end fragment) or 52 °C (3’-end fragment), 1 min at 72 °C), and 7 min at 72 °C. The resulting amplicons were subjected to a second PCR using P8169 and P520 oligonucleotides described in Table S3 and Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England BioLabs, MA, USA), as described above. Thermal conditions were as follows: 30 s at 98 °C, 38 cycles (10 s at 98 °C, 50 s at 64 °C, 1 min 15 s at 72 °C), and 9 min at 72 °C. To construct Tax expression plasmids, the tax gene was amplified by nested PCR using the oligonucleotide primers described in Table S3. First round PCR was performed as described in Section 2.2. Nested PCR was carried out using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase with the following thermal conditions: 30 s at 98 °C, 35 cycles (10 s at 98 °C, 25 s at 58 °C, 1 min at 72 °C), and 10 min at 72 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Library construction for deep sequencing of iPSCs and myoblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Library construction for deep sequencing was performed using a modified version of our previously described protocol26 (link). Briefly, iPSCs and myoblasts were harvested following nuclease treatment and genomic DNA was extracted with the GenElute Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma G1N350). Genomic loci spanning the target sites were PCR amplified with locus-specific primers carrying tails complementary to the TruSeq adapters (Deepseq_TCAP_primer_fwd & Deepseq_TCAP_primer_rev; Supplementary Table 8). 50 ng input genomic DNA was PCR amplified with Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs): (98°C, 15s; 67°C 25s; 72°C 20s) x30 cycles. Next, 0.1 μl of each PCR reaction was amplified with barcoded primers to reconstitute the TruSeq adaptors using the Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs): (98°C, 15s; 67°C, 25s; 72°C, 20s) x10 cycles. Products were qualitatively analyzed by gel electrophoresis. Equal amounts of the products were pooled and gel purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen Cat. #28704). The purified library was deep sequenced using a paired-end 150bp Illumina MiSeq run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Library construction for deep sequencing of iPSCs and myoblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Library construction for deep sequencing was performed using a modified version of our previously described protocol26 (link). Briefly, iPSCs and myoblasts were harvested following nuclease treatment and genomic DNA was extracted with the GenElute Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma G1N350). Genomic loci spanning the target sites were PCR amplified with locus-specific primers carrying tails complementary to the TruSeq adapters (Deepseq_TCAP_primer_fwd & Deepseq_TCAP_primer_rev; Supplementary Table 8). 50 ng input genomic DNA was PCR amplified with Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs): (98°C, 15s; 67°C 25s; 72°C 20s) x30 cycles. Next, 0.1 μl of each PCR reaction was amplified with barcoded primers to reconstitute the TruSeq adaptors using the Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs): (98°C, 15s; 67°C, 25s; 72°C, 20s) x10 cycles. Products were qualitatively analyzed by gel electrophoresis. Equal amounts of the products were pooled and gel purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen Cat. #28704). The purified library was deep sequenced using a paired-end 150bp Illumina MiSeq run.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Directed Evolution of DyP4 Enzyme Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mutagenic primers (Table 1), PCR mixtures and PCR conditions for all site-directed mutagenesis and saturation mutagenesis studies were designed using OneClick programme, which is publicly accessible via the web-link: http://tucksengwong.staff.shef.ac.uk/OneClick/ (Warburton et al. 2015 (link)).
All methionine-substituted variants were created using pET-24a(+)-DyP4 as template. To construct M43L (primers M43L-F and M43L-R), M253L (primers M253L-F and M253L-R) and M253F (primers M253F-F and M253F-R) variants, partially overlapping primers and Q5 high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) were used in a 2-stage PCR. To construct M77L variant (primers M77L-F and M77L-R), DNA polymerase used was substituted with PfuUltra high-fidelity DNA polymerase AD (Agilent Technologies).
Saturation mutagenesis was performed on positions 56, 109, 227, 306, 312 and 374 of DyP4 using pET-24a(+)-OsmY-DyP4 variant 3F6 as template. For position 312, non-overlapping primers were used (Table 1). For positions 56, 109, 227, 306 and 374, a 4-primer method was applied using 2 flanking primers (BamHI-DyP4-Fwd and DyP4-Rev) and 2 internal primers (Table 1). Q5 high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) was used in all PCRs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genetic Manipulation of Listeria monocytogenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lm strains used for these studies are all derived from the attenuated ΔactA strain DP-L402984 (link). When indicated we used the Δhly DP-L4027 strain84 (link). Strains were grown in brain–heart infusion broth, washed and diluted in PBS before infecting Mo-DC or macrophages at the indicated MOI. All nonpolar gene deletions were generated by allelic exchange using the temperature-sensitive plasmid pKSV7 as described85 (link),86 (link).
Sequences located up- and downstream of the corresponding genes were amplified with Q5 High Fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, MA) using primers whose sequences are described in Supplementary Table 1. Amplified fragments were cloned in the pKSV7 vector and were introduced into TOP10 E. coli (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Identified constructs were confirmed by sequencing, plasmids were then transformed into SM10 E. coli and conjugated into Lm strains. Positive clones were identified by performing colony PCR with Q5 High Fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB, Ipswich, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNAi-mediated gene silencing in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RNAi experiments in A. thaliana, a 277-nt Miatrr fragment was amplified from cDNA of M. incognita with two-pair primers using Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerases (M0419, NEB, MA, USA), and then inserted upstream and downstream of the pSAT5 intron in the forward and reverse orientations [34 (link)]. Then, after digestion with restriction enzymes XbaI and KpnI, the hairpin fragment was acquired and inserted into the pSUPER destination vector to construct the pSUPER-Miatrr-RNAi vector. Via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, the RNAi vector was then transformed to A. thaliana Col-0 (wild-type) according to the floral dip method, following the description in a previous study [35 (link)]. Lines were verified via PCR and semiquantitative RT-PCR after hygromycin screening. Homozygous T3 plants from three Miatrr-RNAi lines were used for RNAi effect assay. The homozygous GFP-RNAi T3 lines used as control were the same as described in previous study [36 (link)]. The primers (synthesized by Tsingke Biotechnology), restriction enzymes (NEB, Beverly, MA, USA), and T4 ligase enzyme (M0202, NEB, Beverly, MA, USA) used for plasmid construction are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CRISPR-Cas9 Genomic Editing Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA fragments of the AASV1 locus were amplified from extracted genomic DNA by PCR using the Q5 high-fidelity DNA polymerases (NEB). SURVEYOR nuclease assays were subsequently performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Trans genomic). The indel mutation rates were calculated as previously described (Ran et al. 2013 (link)). Western Blot for AR and FOXA1 knockout in LNCaP-abl cells by different sgRNAs was carried out using whole cell lysates as described previously (Xu et al. 2012 (link)), The antibody used for immunoprecipitation was anti-AR (N-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-FOXA1 (ab23738, Abcam), or anti-GAPDH (sc-25778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The images were analyzed using ImageJ (Schneider et al. 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Amplifying DNA Templates for Diagnostics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dsDNA templates (tpp47 and 23S rRNA) were amplified by using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerases (New England Biolabs, MA, USA; M0492S). A total of 25 μL reaction volume included 1.25 μL of 10 μM tpp47-dsDNA or tp0548-dsDNA or 23S rRNA-dsDNA primers (Supplementary Table 6), 0.5 μL of 10 mM dNTP Mix, 0.25 μL of DNA polymerase, 1 μL of TPA gDNA extracted from rabbit-passaged Nichols or azithromycin-resistant clinical strains, and 20.75 μL of Invitrogen™ DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; 10977015). PCR was performed with the following conditions: 98 °C 30 s, and 40 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 62 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. 1.5% agarose gel was used to identify and purify the dsDNA template, and the target dsDNA was extracted by Universal DNA purification kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China; DP214-03) according to the manufacture’s instruction. The purified dsDNA was quantified by Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; Q33230). The Nichols and SS14 tp0548 dsDNAs were synthesized according to Nichols (GenBank ID: CP004010.2) and SS14 (GenBank ID: CP004011.1) reference genome. The series diluted aliquots of tpp47, tp0548 and 23S rRNA dsDNA contained 1 ng/μL human DNA (extracted from HeLa cell line, CCDCC, Wuhan, China; GDC0009) to simulate human background in clinical samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!