The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fruit mate for rna purification

Manufactured by Takara Bio
Sourced in Japan, China

The Fruit-mate for RNA Purification is a lab equipment product developed by Takara Bio. It is designed for the efficient extraction and purification of RNA from various fruit samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using fruit mate for rna purification

1

Isolation and Characterization of R. zeae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strain D40 was isolated from diseased seedlings of sugar beet with the symptom of damping-off and identified to be R. zeae using previously reported method [19 (link),20 (link),24 (link)]. Samples were collected from Qiqihaer city, Heilongjiang province of China, in 2010. Mycelia of D40 strain was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates with cellophane film membranes (PDA-CF) at 25 °C in the dark for five days before extracting total RNA and dsRNA. Total RNA was extracted using RNAiso Plus (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DsRNA of strain D40 was extracted using the CF-11 cellulose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) chromatography method, as previously described [25 (link)]. In order to remove polysaccharides and pigment from mycelia, addition of Fruit-mate™ for RNA Purification (TaKaRa) and High-Salt Solution for Precipitation (Plant) (TaKaRa) was conducted during extraction of both total RNA and dsRNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Total RNA Extraction from Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from 20 embryos separated from the dehulled seeds using Fruit-mate for RNA Purification and RNAiso Plus (Takara Bio), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quantity and quality of the extracted total RNA was checked using an Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). The extracted total RNA was stored at −80°C for later use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validating miRNA and Target Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to verify the expression profiles of the identified miRNA and its target mRNA, 7 known miRNAs, 4 novel miRNAs, and 12 corresponding target genes were selected for real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) validation.
Total RNA and small RNAs were extracted using TRIzol reagent and Fruit-mate for RNA purification (Takara, Japan). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed using stem-loop qRT-PCR [32 (link)]. Stem-loop primers for reverse transcription and primers for RT-qPCR are listed in Tables S1 and S2. The relative gene expression value was normalized against the relative value of the CpTBP1 gene for mRNA expression [33 (link)] and 5 s RNA for miRNA expression [34 (link)]. SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) was used to reverse transcribe the total RNA using the pulse reverse transcription program. The RT-qPCRs were performed using a total volume of 20 µL containing 10 µL SYBR Mixture (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), 3 µL cDNA template, 0.5 mM primers, and 6 µL ddH2O. PCR was performed on a Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time PCR system using the qPCR Master Mix Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Three biological replicates were used to determine the expression of each gene, and expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted using a Maxwell® 16 Automated Purification System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with Fruit-mate™ for RNA Purification (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Japan). The RNA concentration was determined with a Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and stored at −80 °C.
For reverse transcription we used 100 ng total RNA with the ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The cDNA solution was diluted two-fold and stored at −20 °C.
Real-time PCR was carried out in a LightCycler Nano or 480 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) with the THUNDERBIRD® SYBR® qPCR Mix (Toyobo). The PCR assay was prepared to 20 µL total volume containing 10 µL THUNDERBIRD® SYBR® qPCR Mix, 2.0 µL cDNA solution, and 10 µM gene-specific primers. The gene-specific primer sequences are listed in Table S1. The thermal cycling procedure was as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, three-step amplification consisting of 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, a pre-melt hold at 95°C for 10 s, and melting at 60 °C to 97 °C at a rate of 0.1 °C/s. All target gene data were normalized against EF1α transcript levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extraction of Total RNA from Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaves and internodes of each plant species were homogenized in an SK mill (SK-200, Tokken, Kashiwa, Japan) after freezing with liquid nitrogen. Total RNA extraction from the pulverized samples was performed with a NucleoSpin RNA Plant Kit (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) after pretreatment with a Fruit-mate for RNA Purification (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptome Analysis of Hulless Barley

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two local varieties of Tibetan hulless barley, XQ754 and Nimubai (used and known as tribute barley), were conserved by the Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences. Nimubai has a higher amylose content (33.9%) and β-glucan content (7.5%) as compared to XQ754, which had 27.2% amylose and 6.0% β-glucan (data collected from 2009–2010 in Chengdu). The hulless barley plants were cultivated in October, 2010 and grown under normal conditions in the three fields in Chengdu, Sichuan Province of China.
Grains of Nimubai and XQ754 plants were sampled at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 days after pollination (dap) for RNA extraction. Each sample consisted of grains from nine individuals. Total RNA was extracted from the grains using Trizol Reagent (Takara) and Fruit-mate for RNA purification (Takara), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration and quality of RNA samples were determined using a Nano Drop 2000 micro-volume spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Equal amounts of RNA from each sample of the identical accessions were pooled to construct two cDNA libraries [26] (link), [27] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Berry RNA Extraction for Grapevine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifteen fresh berries of Koshu and Pinot Noir were randomly collected from each grapevine at two weeks post véraison and at harvest. Skins were peeled off from the berries by using tweezers. The skins were placed in a mortar containing liquid nitrogen and homogenized with a pestle. Total RNA isolation from the pulverized skins was performed with a Fruit-mate for RNA Purification (Takara, Otsu, Japan), followed by a NucleoSpin RNA Plant (Takara) for RNA purification according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Rapid RNA Extraction from Frozen Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five leaf samples from a single plant were rapidly frozen in the presence of liquid nitrogen and kept at −70 °C for further experiments. Frozen leaf tissues were ground in liquid nitrogen with a mortar and pestle. We extracted total RNA using two kits: Fruit-mate for RNA Purification (Takara, Shiga, Japan) and the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and quantity of extracted total RNA were checked. Only high quality total RNA was used for the library preparation for RNA-Seq.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis from Seeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA samples were extracted from seeds of IM, HN, HJJ, JJJ, and HoJJ harvested 20 DAP using Fruit-mate for RNA Purification (Takara, Otsu, Japan) and Plant RNA Purification Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers′ instructions. The first-strand cDNAs were synthesized with amfiRivert cDNA Synthesis Platinum Master Mix (GenDEPOT, Barker, TX, USA). To amplify the coding regions of CYP75B3 and CYP75B4 without the stop codon, gene-specific primers were designed based on the two sequences in the public database. PCR was performed in 50-μL reactions containing 1 µL of four-fold-diluted cDNA, 0.4 µM of each primer (Table 2), PrimeSTAR HS DNA polymerase, and 5× reaction buffer (Takara) under the following conditions: 98 °C for 2 min; 30 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplicons were subcloned into the pENTR-SD/D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) via directional cloning technology and verified by DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Maize Transcriptome Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three biological replicates were used for library constructions and sequencing. Each sample was initially treated with Fruit-Mate for RNA purification (Takara) and thereafter the total RNA was isolated with TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). An Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) was used to build cDNA libraries. The generated cDNA libraries were sent to a HiSeq2500-PE125 platform (Illumina) to obtain sequence reads. Based on the genome sequences of maize (B73, RefGen_v4), the Tophat and Cufflinks packages were used to assemble the transcripts and to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using DEGseq2 (Trapnell et al., 2012 (link); Love et al., 2014 (link)), and only genes whose levels were at least 2-fold changed with statistical significance (false discovery rate <0.05) were considered to be DEGs. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and graphing were performed on Omicshare (https://www.omicshare.com/tools/), ImageGP (http://www.ehbio.com/), and agriGO (http://systemsbiology.cau.edu.cn/agriGOv2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!