The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss version 25.0 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS version 25.0 for Windows is a statistical software package that provides advanced analytical capabilities for data management, analysis, and reporting. It offers a wide range of tools and techniques for exploring, visualizing, and modeling data, making it a popular choice for researchers, analysts, and decision-makers across various industries.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

101 protocols using spss version 25.0 for windows

1

Clinical and Demographic Factors in Anorexia Nervosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 25.0 for Windows, adopting an alpha error rate of 0.05 (two-tailed) and a conservative statistical power of 95%. Interrater reliability for the analysis was ascertained preliminarily using Cohen’s κ statistic, to ensure consistency of clinician-administered ratings among raters and minimize rating bias. The normality of data distribution and the homogeneity of variance were verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests, respectively. Parametric comparative analyses for demographic and clinical characteristics of the groups were performed using an independent-samples Student t-test for continuous variables where appropriate (with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test planned for nonparametric distributions) and chi-square analysis for categorical variables (again, nonparametric as appropriate). Pearson’s or Spearman’s rho correlations were calculated for selected clinical variables as appropriate. Binary logistic regression (dependent variable = AN+/AN-) was carried out using the conditional backward logistic regression method for those variables having a significantly different distribution between the AN+ vs. AN- groups upon descriptive analysis; linear regression analysis using BMI as a dependent variable followed the logistic regression. Finally, missing data were excluded pairwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measured values were presented as mean ± SD or as a number (%). Intra-group distributions of variables were evaluated for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and histogram tests. Fisher's exact test or χ2 test was used to evaluate categorical variables and Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to evaluate continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS version 25.0 for Windows was used for statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Retinal Artery Occlusion Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for statistical analyses. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. An analysis was performed using Pearson's χ2-test or trend analysis (linear-by-linear association) for categorical variables, and an independent t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables as appropriate. We divided our patients into subgroups based on the type of RAO (BRAO, complete or incomplete CRAO), the etiology of RAO (LAA, cardioembolism, or undetermined etiology), and age by decade (< 50 years; 50–60 years; 60–70 years; ≥ 70 years). The demographics, comorbidities, and cerebral MRI findings were compared between CRAO and BRAO, etiology of RAO, and age groups, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis (backward elimination) was conducted to identify independent predictors of the co-incident cerebral infarction, WMH, and SLI on cerebral MRI. Conventional risk factors including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity were considered in the uni- and multivariable analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Analysis of Intervention Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our data was analyzed using SPSS Version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All participants' baseline characteristics were expressed using descriptive statistics. The variables were summarized into mean and standard deviation, and the results were analyzed using the two-sample t and ANOVA tests. The two-sample t-test was used to compare baseline differences between groups. The paired t-test was used to compare variables before and after intervention. P-values less than 0.05 and confidence intervals of 95% were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Continuous and Categorical Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD, while categorical variables are presented as percentage. The independent samples t‐test was performed to test differences in continuous variables between the two groups while the Pearson chi‐square was performed to test the differences in categorical variables. Correlation was evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient. p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lymphocyte Count Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the distribution of relative and absolute (epi) lymphocyte counts. Since data did not have a normal distribution, Mann–Whitney U tests were used. For correlation analysis, Pearson r correlation tests were used, while unpaired t-tests were used for group comparison. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All p-values are two-sided. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Predicting Stage 3 AKI After SICH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (Chicago, IL, USA) to perform statistical analysis. Data are expressed as the median with the 25th and 75th quartiles for skewed data or as the mean ± SD for normally distributed data. Differences between groups were evaluated by a non-parametric test or Student’s t-test. Percentages were compared using the chi-squared test. A multivariate logistic regression forward stepwise model was used to identify independent risk factors for SICH complicated to stage 3 AKI. Forest plots were created using GraphPad Prism. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off values for predicting the occurrence of stage 3 AKI. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank tests were used to compare the rates of renal recovery between the Injury and Failure groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for renal recovery. In all analyses, p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Heart Rate Variability Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. All continuous variables obey normal distribution according to Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Q-Q plot. Two-tailed two-sample t-test and paired t-test were used respectively to compare continuous variables between and within groups. Bonferroni correction was used to correct the significance level. The chi-square test was used to compare groups of categorical variables. Correlations were analyzed by using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to estimate factors influencing the HRV indices. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical graphics were drawn with GraphPad Prism 7.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Examining Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity Interventions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A series of one-way ANOVAs (for parametric data) and Pearson’s
chi-squared tests (for categorical data) were conducted in order to detect the
presence of group differences in baseline variables (see Table 1 for means, standard deviations, frequencies,
and percentages). Changes in sedentary behaviors, physical activity levels,
physical function, health-related quality of life, and pain intensity and
interference between and within groups were analyzed using a series of 2 (group)
x 3 (time) mixed-design repeated measures ANOVAs (see Tables 2 and 3 for means, standard deviations, and effect sizes). The overall
alpha familywise was set at α=0.05. Following Fisher’s LSD
procedures, if the initial ANOVA yielded a significant interaction, simple
effects were calculated for all pairwise comparisons. Effect sizes
(Cohen’s d) were calculated to examine the magnitude of
differences between groups as well as the magnitude (small
[d=0.20 to 0.49; moderate [d=0.50 to 0.79];
large [d ≥ 0.80]) of change throughout the intervention
(Cohen, 1988 ). All analyses were by
intention-to-treat. All analyses were conducted with SPSS Version 25.0 for
Windows.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Lumbar Extension Strength Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform all statistical evaluations. The lumbar extension strength was further analyzed for significant difference among the groups using a one-way ANOVA. Moreover, multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between the maximal of strength and predictors (weight, body mass index, and range of motion). The age group differences were assessed using a post-hoc Bonferroni test if the ANOVA was significant. The coefficient of determination r2 was calculated for the regression equations. r2 represents the percentage of variance by the independent variables to predict a dependent variable. The relationships among variables were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Statistical significance was accepted at the 0.05 level. All variables are present as means and standard deviations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!