The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

31 protocols using mp e 65 mm macro lens

1

Insect Collection Protocol: Detailed Measurements and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The examined material is deposited in the following public collections:
SNUC Insect Collection of Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
CNCCanadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, CanadaThe genitalia and other dissected parts were mounted on plastic slides and attached to the same pin as the respective specimens. Photographs were taken with a Canon EOS 7D camera with a MP-E 65 mm macro lens or with a Canon G9 camera mounted on an Olympus CX31 microscope.
The following abbreviations were used in the text, with all measurements in millimeters:
BL Body length: length of body from apices of mandibles to abdominal apex.
FL Forebody length: length of forebody from the anterior margin of the mandibles to the posterior margin of the elytra.
HL Head length: length of head from anterior margin of frons to posterior constriction of head.
HW Head width: maximum width of head.
AnL Antenna length: length of antenna from base of antennomere I to apex of antennomere XI.
PL Pronotum length: length of pronotum along midline.
PW Pronotum width: maximum width of pronotum.
EL Elytral length: length at suture from apex of scutellum to posterior margin of elytra.
EW Elytral width: combined width of elytra.
AL Length of aedeagus: length of aedeagus from apex of longer paramere to base of aedeagal capsule.
The type labels were cited with the original spelling; different labels are separated by slashes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Vauxiid Sponge Remains Microstructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty-two specimens of vauxiid sponge remains were examined in this study. They are housed at the Guizhou Research Center for Paleontology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China (GRCP, GU). Some specimens (Figs 1 and 2) were imaged using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i Digital SLR camera with MP-E 65 mm macro lens. Others (Figs 3 and 4) were imaged at finer scale using a LEO1530VP Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) equipped with an Energy-dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS), located in the State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. One sample, GM-16-1192 was gold-coated, whereas GTBM9-4598a imaged under the SEM were left uncoated. Raman spectroscopy analyses for skeletal composition of vauxiid sponges from the Kaili Biota were performed on an Invia model Raman spectrograph of the Renishaw company. In this instrument, two laser devices with wavelengths of 514 nm and 785 nm excite monochromatic light. Experiment conditions: optical laser wavelengh was 514 nm, scanned area was 100 to 2000 cm−1, time of exposure was 10 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Photographic Documentation of Dental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The photographic record of the samples was taken with a Canon EOS 5DsR camera using a Canon MP-E 65 mm Macro Lens and a ring flash with cross polarized filters. The settings used were 2× magnification on the manual lens, 1/125 shutter speed, F16 aperture, ISO 100, custom white balance with a 18% grey card, and RAW file format for saving pictures, as seen in Figure 3. Standard positioning of the samples was accomplished by developing a custom-made arm with a silicone (Virtual Refill Putty Fast Set, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) tip, matching the incisal edge of the acrylic models.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Beetle in Amber: Preservation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The studied specimen was mined from amber deposits in Yantarny, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russian Federation. The amber piece with the beetle inclusion was polished from the dorsal side to remove extra dirt, allowing the best view of the inclusion. The holotype is well preserved, although the right lateral half of the body was lost due to the over-polishing. The ventral side of the pronotum is covered with a cloudy coating of microbubbles, so-called ‘Verlumung’. The amber piece measurements are 20.4 × 10.6 × 3.8 mm after primary treatment (Figure 1).
Observations were performed using two different types of binocular stereomicroscopes (Nikon SMZ745T and Nikon SMZ800). Photographs were taken using a Canon EOS 80D digital camera mounted on a Canon MP-E 65 mm macro lens (F2.8, 1–5X), together with a Canon MT-24EX twin flash. To improve the quality of the pictures, the amber piece was submerged entirely in clove oil when photographed. Helicon Focus 8.1.0 was used for the focus stacking. Then, the images were edited with Adobe Photoshop Elements 15. The voucher (holotype) is deposited in the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH; curator: D. Grimaldi), New York, NY, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Detailed Imaging of Fossil and Extant Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fossil specimens were documented on a Keyence VHX-6000 digital microscope. Extant specimens were either documented on the same microscope or with a super-macro-photography set up.
Fossil specimens recorded on the VHX microscope were documented with different illumination settings, low-angle ring light and cross-polarised co-axial light, and in front of a white and a black background [17 (link)]. Images with the highest degree of detail were used for further analysis.
The super-macro-photography set up included a Canon EOS 650D camera with an MP-E 65 mm macrolens. Illumination was either provided by macro-twin flashes or a pair of two single flashes (Yongnuo Digital Speedlite YN560EX II). Polarisers were placed on flashes and in front of the lens to provide cross-polarised light [57 ,58 ].
All images are composite images [59 (link)]; a stack of several frames of shifting focal planes was recorded for each image detail (processed with CombineZP or built-in software of microscope); adjacent images details were recorded (each with a stack) and merged to a large panorama (processed with Adobe Photoshop CS3, Adobe Photoshop Elements 11, or built-in software of microscope). Images recorded on VHX microscope are HDR images, additionally. The further processing of images (contrast, levels, and sharpness) was performed in Adobe Photoshop CS2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Resolution Brain and Eye Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolated brain and eyes were imaged with the focus stacking method using a digital camera (Canon 5D4 camera with Canon MPE 65 mm Macro lens, Canon, Japan) mounted on the electronically-controlled focusing rack (Castel-Micro focusing rack, Novoflex, Germany). A sequence of close-up images was captured from the dorsal end of brain to the ventral end using 0.1 mm step for small samples or 0.25 mm step for large samples. Focus stacking (20–80 images) was processed using the software Helicon Focus Pro (version 7.6.4, Helicon Soft Ltd. Ukraine), rendering an image with a greater depth of field.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Nerve Vasculature via Micro-CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preserved vasculature in the nerve segments was quantified using a SkyScan 1276 micro computed tomography (micro CT, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) to calculate the vascular volume (three dimensional) and a Canon 5D Mark IV camera, (Manual Mode, ISO 200, 1/200th of a sec, f/16), a Canon MP-E 65mm Macro lens and a Canon MT-26-RT Twin Lite Macro strobe light source for calculating the vascular surface area (two dimensional), according to protocol19 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microscopic Examination of Fungal Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimens CNU-PHA-NN2012001, CNU-PHA-NN2012002 and CNU-PHA-NN2012003 were examined under dry conditions using a Leica DCF 500 dissecting microscope and illustrated with the aid of a drawing tube. Photographs were taken using a Canon EOS 550D digital camera coupled to a Canon 50 mm macro lens (and an extension tube as appropriate), or a Canon MP-E 65 mm macro lens (all lenses equipped with polarizing filters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Macro- and Scanning Electron Microscopy of Eurypterid Eyes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The macrophotograps of Figs. 1c–l,n–u, 2q–u were taken with a Keyence digital microscope (VHX-700F, objective VH-Z20T and at the Institute of Biology Education (Zoology), University of Cologne. The specimens were not submerged in isopropanol in order to retain the contrasts of the edges. The pictures were processed and arranged to figures with Adobe Photoshop CS3 and Adobe Photoshop Elements.
The macrophotographs of Fig. 2a–d were taken with the specimens submerged in isopropanol using a Canon EOS 600D SLR camera equipped with a Canon MP-E 65 mm macro lens. Free image stacking software (CombineZM by Alan Hadley) was then employed to produce composites with enhanced depth of field using photographs with differing focal planes. These were processed and arranged into figures using Adobe Photoshop CS3.
The SEM photographs were taken at the Biocentre Cologne, (FEI -Quanta FEG 250, Thermo Fischer Scientific).
The eurypterid eyes figured in this contribution are stored in the Geological Institute of the University of Cologne, leg. E. Evangelou (Figs. 1c–e,q–u, 2). They were collected from Siegenian (possibly lowermost Emsian in terms of the international stratigraphic frame) strata of the Jaeger Quarry near Frielingshausen/Bergisches Land, Germany.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Morphological Analysis of Antennae in Arthropods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following abbreviations used in the text refer to the examined collections:
BMNH Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom;
HBUM Hebei University Museum, Baoding, China;
MNHN Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
Figures of antennal morphological details were drawn by hand, using a Nikon SMZ1500 stereomicroscope equipped with a camera lucida. Photographs of other morphological details were taken using a Leica M205A stereomicroscope equipped with a Leica DFC450 camera which was controlled using the Leica application suite 4.3. Habitus were taken with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III camera connected to a Canon MP-E 65 mm macro lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!