The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spinning disk confocal microscope

Manufactured by Yokogawa
Sourced in United Kingdom, Japan

The Spinning disk confocal microscope is a type of microscope that uses a spinning disk with pinholes to rapidly scan a sample, allowing for high-speed, high-resolution imaging of fluorescent samples. The spinning disk creates multiple focal points simultaneously, improving image acquisition speed compared to traditional laser scanning confocal microscopes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

24 protocols using spinning disk confocal microscope

1

Live Imaging of Epithelial Contractility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vivo live imaging was performed with a Nikon Spinning Disk confocal microscope (Yokogawa CSU-X1 spinning disk head with Andor DU-897 EMCCD camera) using a 40X 1.3 NA oil-immersion objective. The camera and laser were positioned by moving ~200 μm down the midline from the head-thorax joint and then laterally to the pnr border. For all samples, a pre-wound z-stack scan was taken using the 488-nm laser line to capture Ecad-GFP or MyoII-GFP and the 560-nm laser line to capture mCherry-labeled pnr nuclei. For tension measurements, 45-second videos were taken of Ecad-GFP labeled cell borders to track tricellular junction (TCJ) movement following micro-ablation. For contractile wave tracking, z-stacks were taken every 30 seconds after wounding or every minute when making before- and after-wave measurements. When imaging live, images at previous timepoints for the current movie can be viewed as soon as they are taken, allowing the contractile wave to be monitored almost in real-time in order to measure tension before and after the wave passed through (Fig. 3EE′′, Movie 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bright Field and Confocal Microscopy Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A BX41 bright field light microscope (Olympus) equipped with a DP72 digital camera (Olympus) and cellSens entry 1.4 software (Olympus) was used for bright field image acquisition. Fluorescence images were acquired with a spinning disk confocal microscope (Yokogawa) using Micro Manager acquisition software (v1.4.22). To prevent imaging of baseline lipofuscin autofluorescence, acquisition software settings were calibrated using a no-antibody negative control slide for each case. Images were acquired as a Z-series with a 1 μm step increment, with three or more high power fields imaged for each slide. Image processing was performed using free ImageJ software (v1.50i), with final editing done using Adobe Photoshop CC (2015.1.2 release).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Brain Volume Analysis in Zebrafish Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For brain volume analysis, 2 and 7 dpf larvae were embedded in low melting point (LMP) agarose (Invitrogen) and were positioned dorsal up in order to facilitate imaging the dorsal aspect of the larvae. Brain volumes were visualized using a Quorum Technologies spinning disk confocal microscope with a CSU10B (Yokogawa) spinning head mounted on an Olympus BX61W1 fluorescence microscope and connected to a Hamamatsu ORCA-ER camera. Images were acquired using Volocity software (Improvision) and analyzed using Imaris software (Bitplane).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining of Kidney Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following fixation in 4% PFA overnight, half of the right kidney was cryoprotected in 30% sucrose overnight, embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) medium and sectioned at 10 μm. For IF staining, sections were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min and incubated in blocking solution [1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 2% donkey serum and 0.02% sodium azide into 1× PBS] for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were incubated in primary antibody overnight at 4°C according to the manufacturer's recommendations, washed with PBS and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature (primary and secondary antibodies are listed in Table S2). After the addition of secondary antibodies, nuclei were stained by Hoechst (Sigma-Aldrich), and samples were mounted using IMMU-MOUNT (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All fluorescence images were captured on a Nikon Spinning-disk confocal microscope with a Yokogawa X1 disk, using a Hamamatsu flash4 sCMOS camera. Images were processed and analyzed using NIS Elements software (Nikon) version 5.0 and ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Confocal Imaging of Mitochondrial Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Fig 2C, GFP‐tagged protein‐expressing cells were grown in Lab‐Tek II chamber slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and co‐stained with MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) before fixation in 4% PFA. Monolayer cells fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories). Cells were imaged by using spinning disk confocal microscope (Yokogawa) using an Andor iXon EM‐CCD camera with a 40× oil objective. Three channels were captured: (i) DAPI (excitation laser: 405 nm; emission filter: 455/50 nm bandpass); (ii) Alexa 488 (excitation laser: 488 nm; emission filter: 525/36 nm bandpass); and (iii) MitoTracker Red (excitation laser: 561 nm; emission filter: 605/52 nm bandpass). Images were pseudo‐colored and analyzed by using ImageJ software. Co‐localization analysis for GFP‐Bax image was performed using CoLocalizer Pro software for Mac (3.0.2). Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the co‐localization of GFP‐Bax and MitoTracker channels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopy for Fluorescence Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence images were observed and collected on a Zeiss spinning disk confocal microscope equipped with a Yokogawa CSU-X1 spinning disk and an evolve charge-coupled device camera with a 20× air objective lens and a 40× water objective lens. A 20× air objective lens was used for semi-in vivo attraction images under 405 nm, 488 nm and bright-field illumination. A 40× water objective lens was used for marker line labelling observation, under 488 nm and 532 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PPM1H Regulation of Phospho-Rab10

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEF cells stably expressing GFP-Rab10 were transiently transfected with plasmids carrying wild-type HA-PPM1H, HA-PPM1H[H153D], or HA-PPM1H[D288A]. After 24 h the cells were fixed with 4% (by vol) paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% saponin for 15 min, and blocked with 1% (by mass) BSA for 1 h. Cells were subsequently stained with mouse anti-HA antibody 1:1000 (Sigma-Aldrich H3663) and rabbit phospho-Rab10 1:1000 (Abcam ab230261). Highly cross absorbed H+L secondary antibodies (Life Technologies) conjugated to Alexa 568 or Alexa 647 were used at 1:5000. Primary and secondary antibody incubations were for 1 h at room temperature. All images were obtained using a spinning disk confocal microscope (Yokogawa) with an electron multiplying charge coupled device (EMCCD) camera (Andor, UK) and a 20x1.4NA or 40x1.4NA objective. Images were analyzed using CellProfiler and presented as maximum intensity projections. Results were quantified by determining the ratios of phospho-Rab10 signal to GFP-Rab10 in cells expressing wild-type HA-PPM1H, HA-PPM1H[H153D], or HA-PPM1H[D288A], and normalizing these numbers to the phospho-Rab10/GFP-Rab10 ratio in non-expressing cells. For each condition at least 20 cells were analyzed. Significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett's post-test at 95% confidence interval. ***, P < 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Subcellular Localization of PvTET Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transient expression assays were conducted in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves to determine the subcellular localization of PvTET3 and PvTET6 proteins. The molecular construction carrying 35S:PvTET3-GFP and 35S:PvTET6-GFP was transferred to A. tumefaciens AGL1. For transient assays, leaves from 4- to 6-week-old wild-type N. benthamiana plants were coinfiltrated with the agrobacterium suspension harboring 35S:PvTETx-GFP. The infiltrated plants were marked and kept in a growth room at 16 h light/8 h darkness at 25 ± 2°C. Plasmolysis was induced using a 1M NaCl hypertonic solution. Fluorescence was visualized 48–72 h after infiltration using a spinning disk confocal microscope (Yokogawa, Japan) as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Fluorescent Bead Mixtures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mixture of 100 nm (diluted 1:10,000 from stock solution) and 500 nm (diluted 1:100 from stock solution) yellow-green fluorescent beads (FluoSpheres carboxylate-modified microspheres, Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was deposited on a polylysine-coated coverglass and imaged by a Nikon spinning-disk confocal microscope, based on the combination of a Yokogawa CSU-X1 confocal scanning unit and a Nikon Ti-E inverted microscope. A Nikon Plan Apo λ 100× oil objective, NA 1.45, was used for all measurements. The pixel size was set to 110 nm. PLICS analysis was performed with threshold = 1000 and m = 16. The image was segmented into a population with size <450 nm and a population with size >450 nm. Filtered ACFs were computed on the segmented images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Synaptic Puncta in Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired with a spinning disk confocal microscope (Yokogawa). A healthy-appearing neuron that was about two cell diameters away from its neighbors was placed in the center of the camera field to capture digital images of fluorescence emissions at 488 nm and 594 nm using MetaMorph image capture software. The selected cell was imaged in serial optical sections at 0.33 μm intervals over a total depth of 5 μm, for a total of 15 optical sections. Maximum intensity projections (MIPs) were generated from these sections, yielding 5 MIPs representing 1 μm of depth each; fluorescence intensity in each MIP was quantified as described previously (Ippolito and Eroglu, 2010 (link)). Synaptic puncta, defined by co-localization of synaptophysin and PSD-95 labeling, were quantified in the selected regions of interest (ROI; 89 × 89 μm square) using Puncta Analyzer program written by Bary Wark for ImageJ 1.26.1 A total of 9 cells from 3 coverslips (each coverslip from a different culture batch) were analyzed for each experimental condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!