The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Catwalk system

Manufactured by Noldus
Sourced in Netherlands, United States

The CatWalk system is a hardware and software solution designed for the automated and objective assessment of gait in small laboratory animals. The system utilizes a high-speed camera and specialized software to capture and analyze the footprints and movement patterns of the test subjects.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

48 protocols using catwalk system

1

Gait Analysis Using Catwalk System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gait analysis was performed at 70 days post-injury using the Catwalk system (Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, the Netherlands). The software labels paw prints automatically, and raw data were collected and analyzed using Catwalk software (Noldus Information Technology). The speed at which each mouse crossed the Catwalk was standardized for analysis, and at least three consecutive steps were required to analyze one crossing. The following parameters were used to assess mouse gait: maximum variation, standing on a single paw, standing on lateral paws, step sequence, forepaw print area and print width, base of support-front paws, and base of support-hind paws (Hamers et al., 2006).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gait and Cartilage Mechanics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gait data of freely moving rats were recorded using the CatWalk System (Noldus Information Technology, Netherlands). A compliant run was defined as a run without interruptions or hitches; all limb data were clearly classified. At least one compliant run was collected and analyzed using computer software (CatWalk XT 10) for each rat [18 (link)]. The nanoindentation experiments were performed using a Piuma Nanoindenter (Optics11, the Netherlands), which can locally detect cartilage mechanical properties via indentation using a previously described method [19 (link),20 ]. Ten regions were selected for the indentation test in each sample, including five each for the medial and lateral plateau cartilages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Assessment of Osteoarthritis Pain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electronic Von Frey hair algesiometer (IITC Life Science) was used to measure the hind paw withdrawal threshold. Before starting the test, mice were separately placed in elevated Plexiglas chambers on metal mesh flooring for 30 mins. A von Frey hair with bending force (0.6 g, 1 g, 1.4 g, 2 g, 4 g) was exerted perpendicular to the plantar surface of the hind paw until it just bent and the hind paw of mice of elevated. The force displayed on the electronic device were recorded. The threshold force required to elicit withdrawal of the paw was determined three times on each hind paw and averaged.
Gait analysis was performed on mice 4 weeks after ACLT by the CatWalk system (Noldus) according to our previous protocol (Zhen et al., 2013 (link)). Briefly, each mouse was placed walkway and allowed to allow the free movement from one side to the other side for at least three times. Mice were trained previously in the formal experiment. After the recording of mouse gait, several parameters were generated, and 5 of the most relevant parameters to OA pain were analyzed. (1) stands, (2) maximal contact at. (3) maximal (4) swing and (5) single stance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gait Analysis of Rats Post-Surgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4 weeks after the operation, gaits of rats were analysed in detail using the CatWalk system (Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands). The light beam from the fluorescent lamp is reflected inside the glass plate. When a mouse’s paw touches the glass plate, the light beam is refracted in the opposite direction, resulting in a bright image of the paw print. The whole process was recorded by the video camera. Data was collected and analyzed using catwalk software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Motor Recovery After SCI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recovery of motor function was evaluated using the automated CatWalk System (Noldus Inc.). Prior to recording baseline measurements, mice were allowed to adapt to the CatWalk apparatus by performing at least 3 compliant runs per day for 3 days. Pre-injury baseline values were collected on the day before the start of the tamoxifen injections (day −4) and on the fourth day of tamoxifen injections before SCI surgery (day 0). Following SCI, gait parameters were measured on days post-injury days 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. Three independent cohorts of control and Zeb2cKO mice were analyzed so that a total of 9 control and 11 Zeb2cKO mice were analyzed. Based on previously established metrics for rodents following contusive SCI (Hamers et al., 2006 (link)), analysis of gait parameters focused on the regularity index, base of support, maximum contact area, stride length, and swing speed. Analyses of gait parameters were conducted by investigators blinded to the animal genotype. All CatWalk gait parameters were analyzed on Prism software (Graphpad Software) using repeated-measures ANOVA (a=0.05) with a Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test (α=0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Locomotor Function Evaluation in Spinal Cord Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The locomotive function of hindlimb was evaluated at 1 day, 3 days, 5 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days, and 56 days post-SCI using the Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) [34 (link)]. Automated gait analysis was also performed pre-surgery and 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-surgery by using a “CatWalk” system (Noldus) [35 (link)]. All experiments were performed during the same period of the day (1:00 PM to 4:00 PM). For BMS, at least two examiners were blinded to the experimental group observed each mouse for 5 min. For Catwalk test, each mouse was trained to cross the Catwalk walkway daily for 7 days before SCI or control operation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Gait Analysis in Rodent Injury Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the Noldus CatWalk system to quantify gait characteristics 72 h after the impact. Individual animals were placed on the glass platform and the animals were allowed to freely walk up and down the CatWalk. A camera from below captured the animal’s footprint for automated analysis. The following parameters were used for a successful run: minimum duration of 0.5 s, maximum duration of 10 s, and during each run the animal’s speed could not change >65%. Each run was classified and the following characteristics were analyzed to assess for gait abnormalities: print area, swing duration, and stride length. Print area was calculated by averaging the area of all the footprints for each individual paw. Swing duration was considered to be the time between the lifting and replacing of the same paw. The stride length was calculated by the distance from the heel of one footprint to the heel of the next footprint of the same paw.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Gait Analysis of Tendon Injury Recovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CatWalk system (Noldus Inc., Wageningen, The Netherlands) was used to analyze the gait recovery of the animals (n = 5). In this protocol, the rats crossed a walkway (100 cm length, 5 cm width, and 0.6 cm thickness) with a glass floor illuminated from the long edge in a dark room. Data acquisition was performed with a high-speed camera (Pulnix TM-765E CCD), and the paw prints were automatically classified by the software. The paw prints were obtained during the 3 days before the partial transection of the tendons to assess the normal standard gait of the animals, and they were collected again after the lesions. Post-operative data were assessed on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, 11th, and 13th days following surgical lesion. The parameters used herein were “Max Contact Intensity”, corresponding to the pressure exerted by the paw on the glass floor during gait. The intensity of magnification can vary from 0 to 255 pixels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gait Recovery Analysis Using CatWalk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the gait recovery analysis, the CatWalk system (Noldus Inc., The Netherlands; was used. In this set up, the animal crosses a walkway with an illuminated glass floor. A high-speed video camera Gevicam (GP-3360, USA) equipped with a wide-angle lens (8.5 mm, Fujicon Corp., China) is positioned underneath the walkway and the paw prints are automatically recorded and classified by the software. The paw prints from each animal were obtained before and after the VRA. Post-operative CatWalk data were collected twice a week for 12 weeks. The peroneal functional index (PFI) was calculated as the distance between the third toe and hind limb pads (print length) and the distance between the first and fifth toes (print width). Measurements of these parameters were obtained from the right (lesioned) and left (unlesioned) paw prints, and the values were calculated using the following formula [27] (link).
Where N: normal, or non-operated side; E: experimental, or operated; PL: print length; TS: total toe spread, or distance between first to fifth toe.
The pressure exerted on the platform by individual paws was also evaluated. The Catwalk data from each day were expressed as an ipsi-/contralateral ratio.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Automated Gait Analysis for Sciatic Nerve Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the gait recovery analysis, the CatWalk system (Noldus Inc, The Netherlands) was used. In this method, the animal crosses a walkway with a glass floor illuminated from the long edge. Data acquisition was carried out by a high-speed camera and the paw prints were automatically classified by the software. The paw prints from each animal (minimum of n = 8 per group) were obtained before and after the sciatic crushing. Post-operative data were assessed on the third, fourth and fifth days following surgical intervention, and then twice a week until 8 weeks post-lesion.
The parameters used herein to calculate the sciatic functional index were the distance between the third toe and hind limb pads (print length, PL), and the distance between the first and fifth toes (toe spread, TS). Measurements of the parameters were obtained from the right (normal) and left (experimental) paw prints and the values were used to calculate the sciatic functional index (SFI), according to the following formula [16 (link)]: SFI = 118.9 (ETS - NTS/NTS) - 51.2 (EPL - NPL/NPL) - 7.5 (E = experimental side, N = normal side). In addition, the pressure exerted by the individual paws during contact with the platform was evaluated. The data were expressed as the lesioned/unlesioned ratio for each day of training.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!