The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using instagenetm matrix

1

PCR-based Identification of E. coli Virulence Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One hundred (100) presumptive E. coli isolates were randomly selected and inoculated separately into 5 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 2 mL nutrient broth (Merck, Johannesburg, South Africa). The flasks were incubated overnight at 37 °C on a rotary shaker at 100 rpm. DNA was extracted from 1 mL of the overnight culture using the InstaGeneTM Matrix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Johannesburg, South Africa) following the manufacturer’s instruction. The template DNA was stored at −20 °C for PCR assays. All selected samples were first confirmed as E. coli by testing for the presence of the malate dehydrogenase (mdh) gene which is found in most E. coli strains [21 (link)]. After that, the presence of a total of eight VGs (eaeA (EPEC/EHEC), eagg (EAEC), ipaH (EIEC), ST (ETEC), ibeA (NMEC), stx1 (EHEC), stx2 (EHEC) and flicH7 (EHEC)) were investigated. The primer sequences and the PCR-cycling conditions for the identification of the various VGs were as previously described by Abia et al. [19 (link)]. Both multiplex and singleplex PCR assays were performed for the target genes. Multiplex PCR assays were divided into 3 sets where set 1 contained eaeA, eagg and ipaH, set 2 contained flicH7 and Stx1 and finally set 3 contained ST and ibeA genes [19 (link),22 (link),23 (link)]. Singleplex real-time PCR assays were performed for the mdh and stx2 target genes [24 (link),25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rapid DNA Extraction for LAMP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained pellets were resuspended in 100 µL of lysis buffer (InstaGeneTM Matrix, Bio-Rad, München, Germany) and briefly vortexed. The samples were then heated at 130 °C for 7 min in a prototypal battery-operated device. After 7 min incubation time, the samples were left to cool down for a few minutes and were directly processed in the LAMP reactions, with no purification steps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Carbapenemase Genes Detection in Acinetobacter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of acquired class D carbapenemases genes common for Acinetobacter spp. (groups OXA-23, OXA-24/40, and OXA-58), as well as class B carbapenemases (metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL) of VIM, IMP, and NDM groups) were determined by real-time PCR using commercial kits “AmpliSensR MDR Acinetobacter-OXA-FL” and “AmpliSensR MDR MBL-FL” (Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Moscow, Russia). For amplification, a DTPrime 5X1 real-time PCR system (DNA Technology, Moscow, Russia) was used. Strains A. baumannii, A. pittii, and P. aeruginosa, carring the known carbapenemases genes of the listed groupswere used as positive controls. DNA extraction was performed by express method using InstaGeneTM matrix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Samples of extracted DNA were stored at −20 °C before testing. The results of assessing the sensitivity to antibiotics and determining the genes of various types of carbapenemases have been deposited to the AMRmap website database [49 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast Identification and Typing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted using the InstaGeneTM Matrix according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). The D1/D2 domains of the 26S rRNA gene was amplified for the yeast identification using the NL1 (5′ GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG 3′) and NL4 (5′ GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG 3′) primer pair [23 (link)]. The PCR products were purified by ExoSAP-IT (Thermo Fisher, Milan, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and delivered to BMR Genomics (Padua University, Padua, Italy) for sequencing. The obtained sequences were compared to those available in the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nml.nih.gov/BLAST, accessed on 3 January 2024) in order to determine the closest known relative species on the basis of the 26S rRNA gene homology.
The strains were typed by RAPD-PCR with the primer M13 (5′ GAGGGTGGCGGTTCT 3′), as previously described [24 (link)]. The Fingerprinting II InformatixTM software program (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy) was employed for the conversion and normalization of the RAPD-PCR patterns. The similarities among the profiles were calculated by clustering the Pearson’s r correlation matrix using the unweighted pair group method with average (UPGMA) algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

16S rRNA Gene Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial genomic DNA samples were extracted using the InstaGeneTMMatrix (Bio-Rad, USA). The primers 27F 5’ (AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG)
3’ and 1492R 5’ (TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T) 3’ were
used for PCR. PCR reaction was performed with 20 ng of genomic DNA as template
in a 30 µL reaction mixture by using EF-Taq (Solgent, Korea) as follows:
activation of Taq polymerase at 95°C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 95°C
for 1 min, 55°C, and 72°C for 1 min each was performed, finishing
with a 10-min step at 72°C. The amplification products were purified with
a multiscreen filter plate (Millipore Corp., USA). Sequencing reaction was
performed using a PRISM BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied
Biosystems, USA). DNA samples containing the extension products were added to
Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems). The mixture was incubated at 95°C
for 5 min followed by 5 min on ice and then analyzed by ABI Prism 3730XL DNA
analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Identification of STEC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fecal samples (n = 446) were individually enriched as previously described by Stromberg et al. (2015). Briefly, 1 g of fecal material was homogenized with 9 mL EC broth (BD Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h [21 (link)]. Then three loops of the enriched material were inoculated on McConkey agar (BD Difco) plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacterial DNA was extracted from the confluent growth area with the InstaGeneTM Matrix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. We ran a multiplex PCR screen to detect the stx1 and stx2 genes, using previously described conditions and primers [22 (link)] (Table 1). PCR reactions were performed using GoTaq® Green Master Mix, following manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
For each sample testing positive for stx1 and/or stx2, we re-isolated 30 colonies from the original McConkey plate where the bacterial DNA was previously extracted. These colonies were examined for the presence of stx genes by PCR, and stx positive isolates were later confirmed as E. coli by a PCR described by Chen et al. [24 (link)] (Table 1). We selected 1 to 4 STEC colonies from each positive sample and stored them in 20% glycerol at −80 °C until further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phylogenetic Analysis of Novel Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phylogenetic analyses of growth-positive cultures were based on PCR amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. DNA templates for PCR were prepared from growth-positive cultures using the InstaGeneTM Matrix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The amplification of 16S rRNA genes were performed by PCR using 27F and 1492R primers, followed by Sanger sequencing with 800R and 518F primers (Macrogen Inc., Korea). Taxonomic classification of 610 strains obtained from the HTC experiments was carried out using the “classify.seqs” command of the Mothur software package (v1.39.5)63 (link) using the SILVA database SSURef NR99 (release 132)64 (link) as a reference. For more refined taxonomic and phylogenetic analysis of the SAR202 isolates, the 16S rRNA gene sequences were aligned using the SINA online aligner (v1.2.11, http://www.arb-silva.de/aligner)65 (link), imported into ARB program66 (link), and inserted using the ARB parsimony into the guide tree of SILVA database SSURef NR99 (release 132)64 (link). After manual curation, the aligned sequences of the isolates and their phylogenetic relatives were exported with “ssuref:bacteria” filter. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed using RAxML67 (link) (v8.2.12) with GTRGAMMA method including 100 bootstrap replicates and visualized using the MEGA software (v7.0)68 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Molecular Identification of Chitinase-Producing Bacillus licheniformis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Molecular identification was done by 16S rRNA analysis. Briefly, high yield of chitinase producer Bacillus licheniformis (SSCL-10) reported in our earlier studies [7 ] was selected for the study. Bacterial genomic DNA of Bacillus licheniformis (SSCL-10) was extracted using the Insta Gene TM Matrix (Bio-Rad, cat-no. 7326030), according to the manufacturers' instruction. Then, a 16S rRNA subunit gene fragment was amplified by using 16S rRNA universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGG CTCAG-3′) and the reverse primer 1492R (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) [22 (link)] using MJ Research Peltier Thermal Cycler (Marshall Scientific, USA). PCR was performed in a 30 μL reaction mixture (20 ng genomic DNA) under the following cycling conditions: 95°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final incubation at 72°C for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Identification of Bacterial Species via 16S rDNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolated strain was identified by using the 16S rDNA sequencing method as
described previously (Kim et al., 2018 (link)).
Bacterial genomic DNA samples were extracted using the InstaGeneTMMatrix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The primers 27F (5’-AGA
GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3’) and 1492R (5’-TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG
ACT T-3’) were used for the PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plasmid DNA Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic and plasmid DNA isolation was extracted by standard procedures using InstaGene TM Matrix (Bio-Rad) and E.Z.N.A. ® Plasmid DNA kit (Omega Bio-tek), respectively. Bacterial cultures were grown at 42 ºC for 48 h on CBA plates. BglII restriction pattern was used to characterize the isolated plasmids. PCR amplification was performed with PCR MasterMix (2x) (Thermo Scientific TM ). All the primers used are described in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!