The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using anti xbp1

1

Affinity-based Protein Purification and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Relevant proteins were transiently expressed in HEK-293FT cells, followed by cell lysis in a buffer as described previously24 (link),25 (link). After cell lysis, anti-FLAG-coated magnetic beads (Sigma) or anti-His-tagged agarose beads (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) were added, followed by further incubation at 4 °C for 2 h. The precipitated proteins were washed in the same lysis buffer and subjected to immunoblotting with anti-FLAG (1:2000; F3165, RRID: AB_259529) (Sigma), anti-XBP1 (1:2000; 619501, RRID: AB_319507) (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-β-actin (1:4000; #8457, RRID: AB_10950489) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). Cells were also harvested at the indicated time points, and whole-cell-lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-XBP1 (Biolegend), anti-Fbw7 (1:2000; SC-293423), anti-p50 (NF-κB) (1:2000; SC-8414, RRID: AB_628015), anti-E2F-1 (1:2000; SC-251, RRID: AB_627476) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling), and anti-Lamin B (1:2000; PA 50043) (AB Frontier, Seoul, Korea) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Monitoring UPR Pathway Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell extracts or nuclear extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. IRE1α phosphorylation was monitored by Phos-tag SDS-PAGE. PERK phosphorylation was monitored by 5% SDS-PAGE. The following antibodies were used for immunoblot analysis: anti-XBP1s (BioLegend, 619502); anti-PERK (Cell signaling, #5683); anti-IRE1α (Cell Signaling, #3294); anti-ATF6 (Cosmo bio, BAM-73-500-EX); anti-ATF4 (Santa Cruz, sc-200); anti-Hsp90 (Santa Cruz, sc-7947), anti-TBP (Abcam, 51841); anti-EIF2α (Santa Cruz, sc-11386); anti-phospho-EIF2α (Cell Signaling, #9721).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of ER Stress Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (Nakada et al., 2010 (link)). Briefly, the same number of cells (20,000-30,000) from each test population were sorted into Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and adjusted to a final concentration of 10% TCA. Extracts were incubated on ice for 15 minutes and spun down for 10 minutes at 13,000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and the pellets were washed with acetone twice then dried. The protein pellets were solubilized with Solubilization buffer (9 M Urea, 2% Triton X-100, 1% DTT) before adding LDS loading buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Proteins were separated on a Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Antibodies were anti-Ire1α (Cell Signaling Technology, 3294), anti-Xbp1s (Biolegend, Poly6195), and anti-ß-actin (A1978, Sigma). 
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ChIP-seq antibody usage protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used for chIP assays: normal rabbit IgG (2729; Cell Signaling Technology) at a 1:200 dilution and anti-XBP1s (619502; BioLegend) at a 1:100 dilution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunostaining of Phospho-IRE1 in Hippocampal Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary cultured hippocampal neurons were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton‐X 100 for 10 min, followed by treatment with 1% bovine serum albumin for 20 min. These procedures were performed at room temperature (25°C). The following antibodies were used; anti‐IRE1 (1 : 500; Cell Signaling Technology, RRID: AB_823545), anti‐microtubule‐associated protein 2 (MAP2) (1 : 1000; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, RRID: AB_11213363), anti‐MAP2 (1 : 500; Abcam, Cambridge, UK, RRID: AB_2138153), anti‐postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) (1 : 500; NeuroMab, Davis, CA, USA, RRID: AB_2307331), anti‐XBP1s (1 : 500; BioLegend, Sandiego, CA, USA, RRID: AB_2562960), and Anti‐phospho‐IRE1α (1 : 500). Cells were visualized under a FV1000D confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). P‐IRE1 and MAP2 fluorescence intensities 40–90 μm from somata in randomly selected dendrites were measured, using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA). The number of P‐IRE1‐positive puncta overlapping with PSD95‐positive postsynaptic sites was manually counted 40–90 μm from somata in randomly selected dendrites. The cells were randomly chosen from five independent cultures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptional Regulation Analysis by ChIP Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PTH1R or IHH luciferase reporter plasmid and XBP1s or negative control plasmid were transfected into 293T cells by using PEI. The activity of firefly and renilla luciferases was quantified using a dual luciferase reporter gene detection system (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA). To standardize the difference in transfection, firefly luciferase activity was normalized to that of renilla luciferase.
C28/I2 cells were submerged in DMEM containing 1% formaldehyde and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. Fixation was stopped by the addition of 0.125 M glycine. The cell lysate was harvested and sheared with 12 pulses of 3% amplitude. Each pulse consisted of a 2.5-s sonication followed by a 7.5-s rest on ice to prevent heat build-up. The sample was incubated with 2 μg of anti-XBP1s (BioLegend, Cat. No. 647502) antibody or IgG (Cat. No. 2729) overnight at 4 °C on a vertical mixer. The enriched DNA fragments were harvested by using methods according to the manufacturer's instructions for the ChIP assay kit (Beyotime, P2078). The IHH (−747 to −553) and PTH1R (−1338 to −1137) promoter regions were amplified. The amount of immunoprecipitated DNA in each sample was represented as a percentage of the total amount of input chromatin, which was equivalent to 100%. The primers used in ChIP are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blotting Quantification Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling) and protein concentration was determined using the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad). 50 μg of lysates were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred onto Nitrocellulous membranes (Bio-Rad) following standard protocols. Antibodies used include: anti-XBP1s (BioLegend), anti-BCL10, anti-GCLM and anti-β actin (Santa Cruz Biotech), and anti-IGF1R (Cell Signaling). Chemiluminescence was induced with ECL detection reagents (GE Health) and measured using ChemiDoc system (Bio-Rad). Blots were quantified using NIH ImageJ64 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ChIP Assay for XBP1s Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assays were performed with an Agarose ChIP Kit (Pierce, Cat# 26156, Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 293T cells were subjected to cross-linking with 1% formaldehyde, and glycine solution was then added to stop the cross-linking process. Nuclear extracts were prepared. Chromatin-XBP1s complexes were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag (Sigma, Cat# F3165; diluted 1: 500, St. Louis, MO, USA) or anti-XBP1s (BioLegend, Cat# 647501; diluted 1:100) antibodies by incubation at 4 °C overnight, and this was followed by incubation with beads from the Agarose ChIP Kit (Pierce) or Protein G-Sepharose beads (GE Health, Chicago, IL, USA) at 4 °C for 1 h with gentle rocking. After the beads were washed 5 times with wash buffer, the complexes were eluted from the beads with elution buffer and subjected to PCR analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunocytochemistry of Neonatal Rat Cardiomyocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunocytochemistry (ICC) of NRCs, cells were grown on Lab-Tek II chamber slides (Thermo Scientific, 154461) plated at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well. Subsequently, immunofluorescent microscopy was performed essentially as described previously [48-50 (link)]. Cells were first washed with PBS, fixed for 15 min in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X 100 in PBS, and exposed to an antigen retrieval solution (0.1 M glycine, pH 3.5) for 30 min. The fixed cells were incubated in blocking solution (1% BSA, 0.1% cold water fish gelatin, 0.1% Tween-20, 0.05% sodium azide in PBS) for 1 h. Primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4°C, whereas the secondary antibody (1:100) along with counterstains were applied for 1 h at room temperature. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-Sigmar1 (1:100, Invitrogen) anti-actin (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich), anti-TnI (1:1000, Millipore), anti-CHOP (1:100, Cell Signaling, Technologies, Inc.), α-cardiac actin (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich), anti-XBP1s (1:200, BioLegend). Coverslips were fixed with Vectashield Hardset (Vector Labs, H1400). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Invitrogen). Cells were imaged using a Leica TCS SP5 Spectral Confocal Microscope loaded with Leica LAS (AF 2.6.3) and NIS-Elements (AR 4.13.04) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of UPR Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed according to standard protocols. Antibodies used include: anti-XBP1s (1:1000, BioLegend), anti-XBP1 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-IRE1α, anti-phospho-eIF2α, anti-phospho-eIF2 (1:1000, Cell Signaling) and anti-β–actin (1:1000, Santa Cruz).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!