The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti cd115 pe

1

Murine MDSC Isolation and Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MCA26 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice were used to generate murine MDSC in vivo as previously described (23 (link)). Briefly, mice with tumor sizes greater than 10 × 10 mm2 were sacrificed and MDSC were enriched from total bone marrow cells by Percoll gradient centrifugation (GE Healthcare) as previously reported (25 ). Cells banding at 50–60% were labeled with anti-CD115 PE (eBioscience) followed by magnetic bead positive selection using anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). For in vitro generation of MDSC, mouse bone marrow cells were cultured with 50 ng/ml GM-CSF and 50 ng/ml IL-6 for 5 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Monocyte Subset and TSLP Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood samples were used for the detection of monocyte subsets upon clodronate treatment. For the analysis of TSLP expression in the skin, excised tissue samples were placed into a cocktail of collagenase I, collagenase XI, DNase I and hyaluronidase (Sigma‐Aldrich); and shaken at 37°C for 1 hour. Cells were then triturated and centrifuged (15 minutes, 500 g, 4°C).
Cells were labelled with anti – CD11b – FITC or eFluor 450 (eBioscience), anti–Gr1‐PerCP‐Cy5.5 (eBioscience), anti‐CD115‐PE (eBioscience), anti–CD11c‐PE‐Cy7 (eBioscience) or anti–CD45‐FITC (eBioscience) and then analysed by flow cytometry on a Fortessa cytometer (Becton Dickinson). For intracellular cytokine staining, surface staining was performed before permeabilization using an intracellular staining kit (eBioscience). TSLP was labelled with anti‐TSLP‐Alexa Fluor 488 (Bioss Antibodies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Monocyte Subset Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected 100-µl aliquots of tail blood into EDTA-containing tubes. Cells in some tubes were Fc-blocked with 1 µg of mouse IgG (105 cells) for 15 min at room temperature without excess washing. After blocking, cell suspensions were then labeled with several monocyte-surface markers (anti-CD115–PE, eBioscience, catalog #17-1152; and anti-Ly-6C–APC, eBioscience, catalog #12-5932) and anti-CCR2–FITC (B&D, catalog: FAB5538F) or anti-CX3CR1-FITC (catalog #FAB5825G, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 4°C for 30 min. After cells were lysed by the addition of 4 ml Whole Blood Lysing Reagent (catalog #FC002, R&D Systems), the cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS followed by centrifugation at 300× g for 5 min. The pellets were resuspended by adding 150 µl PBS. Controls included cells incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated unspecific isotype Ab as needed. Cell-surface molecule expression measurement and cell sorting were performed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Acquired fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) data files were analyzed using the flow cytometry CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Blood CD115+/Ly-6high cells defined as monocytes were further analyzed for CX3CR1 and CCR2 expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Macrophage Surface Marker Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the surface marker staining, differentiated macrophages were harvested using Accutase and 2 × 104 cells were stained using anti‐CD11c‐PECy7 (eBioscience), anti‐CD11b‐APC (BD), anti‐MHCII‐FITC (BD), and anti‐CD115‐PE (eBioscience) antibodies diluted in FACS buffer (PBS + 1% FCS) supplemented with Fc‐blocking ab. After 1 h of incubation, the cells were washed 2x PBS and resuspended in FACS media. The analysis was performed using FACS Fortessa and data were analyzed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!