The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using 0.22 μm syringe filter

1

Recombinant Prion Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Syrian golden hamster residues 90 to 231 (hamster 90–231 or Ha 90–231) and chimeric hamster-sheep (Ha-S; Syrian hamster residues 23 to 137 followed by sheep residues 141 to 234 of the R154Q171 polymorph [accession no. AY907689]) prion protein genes were ligated into the pET41 vector (EMD Biosciences). Escherichia coli carrying this vector was grown in Luria broth (LB) medium in the presence of kanamycin and chloramphenicol. rPrPSen expression was induced using Overnight Express Autoinduction system 1 (Novagen) and Bug Buster master mix (Novagen) to isolate inclusion bodies. Following solubilisation of the inclusion bodies in 8M guanidinium-HCl, the denatured protein was purified under 6M guanidinium-HCl denaturing conditions using nickel nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) superflow resin (Qiagen) with an AKTA 25 L protein liquid chromatography instrument (GE-Healthcare, Life Sciences). The rPrPSen was subjected to on-column refolding using a linear gradient into phosphate buffer and then eluted using an imidazole gradient as previously described14 (link). The purified protein was extensively dialyzed into 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.8). Then, following filtration (0.22-μm syringe filter; Sartorius), a concentration measurement by absorbance at 280 nm was performed and the rPrPSen was stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction and Analysis of Rice Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction method was performed using a published method [22 (link),44 (link)]. Briefly, 1.0 g of rice sample was added with 5 mL of Milli-Q water, followed by 5 mL of 10% (v/v) acetic acid in acetonitrile (ACN) and mixed for 2–3 min using a vortex mixer. Then, 2.0 g of MgSO4, 0.5 g of sodium citrate tribasic dehydrate, and 0.25 g of sodium citrate dibasic sesquihydrate were added into the mixture that was then shaken for 1–2 min. The ACN fraction was separated using centrifugation at 1968× g for 5 min. Supernatant fractions of 2 mL were transferred into a tube containing 300 mg of MgSO4, 50 mg of C18, and 25 mg of primary secondary amine (PSA), and shaken for 2–3 min. The mixture was separated using centrifugation at 1968× g for 15 min. Then, 1 mL of supernatant was completely evaporated to dryness under a nitrogen stream at 40 °C on a heating block. The residue was reconstituted with the mobile phase solution, and passed through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Sartorius AG; Goettingen, Germany) before being analyzed using LC-MS/MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Characterization of p43 Protein from Trichuris muris

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Trichuris muris adult worms were collected from the cecum of mice on day 42 post infection. They were cultured for up to 24 h in RPMI-1640 plus 500 international units/ml (IU) penicillin and 500 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK). The culture medium containing E/S proteins was pelleted at 720 × g for 15 min to remove eggs. E/S in 50-ml Falcon tubes (Corning) was filtered through a 0.22-μm syringe filter (Sartorius) and incubated overnight with end-over-end mixing at 4 °C with 5 mM imidazole and 2 ml of Ni NTA agarose (Qiagen, Manchester, UK). The next day, two washes were performed using 25 mM Tris, 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.9, and 20 and 40 mM imidazole. p43 was eluted from the beads in 250 mM imidazole as 10 × 1-ml fractions. The eluate was run on a gel to check for p43 in the fractions. It was then further purified on a size-exclusion column Superdex 75 (GE Healthcare) in 20 mM Tris and 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.9. Zero point five milliliter fractions were eluted and run on 4–12% Bis-Tris gel to confirm the p43-containing fractions. p43 was concentrated using a centrifugal filter unit, 10-kDa MWCO (Millipore), and sterilized using a syringe filter with a 0.22-μm pore size. p43 concentration was determined using a Nanodrop (Labtech International, UK), and protein was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C, until required for experimental use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Intracameral Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Injection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2.6 MDa HA was first dissolved in Balanced Salt Solution Plus component I (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, United States) and Balanced Salt Solution (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, United States) at 0.4% w/v concentration overnight and filter sterilized using 0.22 μm syringe filter (Sartorius, Germany). Right before dissolving the polymers, Balanced Salt Solution Plus component II was added to the viscosity enhanced Balanced Salt Solution Plus component I solution at 1:24 volume ratio. Afterwards HA-VS and HA-SH of MW 29 kDa, 20% DM were dissolved in Balanced Salt Solution Plus (components I and II) and Balanced Salt Solution, respectively, at 6% w/v concentration for about 20 minutes. The polymers were then placed on an ice-cold metal plate. Before injection, 5μl of HA-VS and 5μl of HA-SH polymers were mixed on an ice-cold metal plate. 1.5μl of the mixture was aspirated by a pulled glass micropipette needle and injected into the anterior chamber targeted at the anterior chamber angle. It took approximately 3 minutes to complete the intracameral injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles from Mouse Stool Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We placed each group of mice on an RD, or an HFD containing 60% fat for 12 weeks and collected stool samples at 12 weeks. Stool samples were dissolved in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and centrifuged at 5, 20, and 340 g for 5 min each. Supernatant fractions were pelleted once at 10,000 g for 30 min and then filtered through a 0.45-μm syringe filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Goettingen, Germany) followed filtration through a 0.22-μm syringe filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Goettingen, Germany). The filtrates were then subjected to density-gradient centrifugation in a Beckman ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, USA) at 100,000 g for 2 h at 4 °C. Fraction between 10% and 40% OptiPrep solution (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) was taken, and EVs were prepared by centrifugation at 150,000 g for 2 h at 4 °C using a Beckman ultracentrifuge. EVs were diluted in PBS and stored at –80 °C. The protein concentration of EVs was assessed by a BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Producing HIV-1 and Virus-Like Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HIV-1NL4-3 stocks were made by transfection of HEK293T cells with a proviral DNA plasmid (39 (link), 40 (link)). The medium was replaced at 24 h posttransfection, and HIV-1 was harvested at 72 h posttransfection. All virus stocks were quantified by a CAp24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and stored in small aliquots at −80°C as previously described (18 (link)).
VLPs that convey NB-ZSG or ZSG were produced as previously described (21 (link)). Briefly, 10 μg of the pSRS11-SF-γC vector (25 (link)) expressing NB-ZSG or ZSG and 2 μg of a plasmid expressing Gag-Pol were transfected into Phoenix-Ampho cells (41 (link)) with X-tremeGENE HP DNA transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The cell medium was replaced at 24 h posttransfection. VLPs were harvested by filtration with a sterile 0.22-μm syringe filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) at 48 h and 72 h posttransfection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoparticle Preparation by Desolvation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoparticles were prepared by the desolvation technique as described by Langer et al.11 (link) modified by Sánchez-Segura et al.14 (link) and readjusted from Sánchez-Arreguin et al.10 (link). Briefly, 200 mg of BSA powder were dissolved in 2 mL of 10 mmol NaCl solution, pH 9.4, and filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany). The solution was maintained under agitation at 200 rpm using a stirrer (Eurostar 20, IKA, Wilmington, NC, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. The formulations of increasing concentration of capsaicin were generated by the addition of 4 mL of an ethanol-capsaicin solution at 0, 812, 1625, 2437, and 3250 µg mL−1 for each drying treatment. The rate of addition was 1.0 mL min−1 at 200 rpm of stirring speed. The crosslinking process was carried out by the addition of 5 mL of 4% glutaraldehyde in a 10 mmol NaCl solution in agitation at 1000 rpm for 30 min in dark conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Enzymatic Saccharification of Pretreated Biomass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enzymatic saccharification of pretreated biomass was evaluated using the commercial cellulase enzyme solution Cellic® CTec2 (Novozymes A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark) at an enzyme load of 20 FPU gsolids−1. The reactions were performed in duplicate inside 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes containing 1.0 mL solutions comprising 3% w/w dry solids in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 5). The mixture was incubated in a thermomixer at 50 °C and 800 rpm for 72 h, with samples taken at 8, 24, 48, and 72 h. After collection, the samples were placed in a water bath at 100 °C for 5 min to denature the enzyme and then centrifuged at 12 000 × g for 10 min at room temperature. The supernatant was removed from the solids, filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) and the sugars were quantified by HPLC as previously described (see section “Organosolv fractionation”).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Flavonoids by UPLC-QTOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total flavonoid content was extracted according to Liu et al. (2019) (link), with a minor modification. Sample powder (0.05 g FW) was sonicated in 1 mL of 100% methanol for 30 min at room temperature. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, the sample supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Sartorius, Gottingen, Germany) into an UPLC vial. Target flavonoids were detected using an Acquity UPLC I-class/VION IMS QTOF (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, United States) instrument, equipped with a photodiode array detector (PDA). The separation of the target flavonoids was achieved on a C18 BEH (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm) column equipped with a C18 BEH (1.7 μm) precolumn (Waters) at 45°C, and the mobile phases consisted of eluent A (0.1% formic acid in Milli-Q water) and eluent B (0.1% formic acid in MeCN, Dingguo Corp., Beijing, China) with a flow rate of 0.4 mL min–1. The procedures were as follows: 5–20% B (0–3 min), 20–100% B (3–10 min), 100% B (10–12 min), 100–95% B (12–15 min), 95% B (15–19 min). Finally, 1 μL of the sample was injected into the liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer (LC-MS) system and the UV wavelength was set at 254 and 335 nm for the detection of genistein and scutellarin. The mass spectrometric analysis and construction of the standard curve were performed according to Xia et al. (2014) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preparation of Plant Extract Powders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TSB used in the study was obtained from plants aged at least two years, whereas the TSF was collected from a seven-year-old plant. The collected materials were washed and boiled twice with reverse osmosis water for 60 min. Then, the crude extracts were collected to freeze and dry to form powder. TSB and TSF extracts were dissolved in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) and filtered using a 0.22-μm syringe filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech Inc., Göttingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!