The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using anti fhl2

1

Dissection, Immunoblotting, and Immunoprecipitation of EphB3 and Apoptosis Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ipsilateral cortex and underlying white matter around the injury epicentre were dissected at 2 hpi, 6 hpi, 24 hpi, 7 dpi and sham mice. Brain lysates (30 µg) were prepared and resolved in 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels as previously described (Theus et al., 2014 (link)). The primary mouse anti-EphB3 (Novus Abnova, Littleton, CO, USA), anti-caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-caspase-8 and cleaved caspase-8 (Cell Signaling), anti-caspase-9 and cleaved caspase-9 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) or anti-FHL-2 (Abcam) antibody were applied at 1:200 dilution in 5% bovine serum albumin solution overnight at 4°C. Protein expression was normalized to β-actin (Cell Signaling).
For IP, 150 µg of protein sample was incubated with 1.5 µg of anti-EphB3 IgG2a mouse antibody (Novus Abnova) or a negative mouse mAb IgG2a isotype control (Cell Signaling). The membrane was subsequently incubated with the primary antibody of interest (anti-EphB3, anti-caspase-3, -8 and -9 and anti-FHL-2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Analysis of CTHRC1 and FHL2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HFL-1 cells were grown on Lab-Tek chamber II slides containing 10% FCS-supplemented DMEM. Following this, the cells were grown with serum-free media containing TGF-β1 (0.25 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of pirfenidone (100 μg/mL) for 48 h. HFL-1 cells were washed thrice in PBS and then fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 30 min. Permeabilization was performed in buffer containing 0.1% Triton and 0.1% sodium citrate for 5 min at 4 °C. The cells were sequentially incubated with monoclonal anti-CTHRC1 (1:50 dilution; Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA; cat. no. 16534–1-AP) and anti-FHL2 (1:50 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, UK; cat. no. ab66399). The proteins were visualized by incubation with secondary antibody labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Images were obtained using Axioplan 2 imaging system (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) with AxioVision software (ZEISS). Images used for comparisons of different cells and/or treatments were acquired using the same instrument settings and exposure times and were processed similarly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Myogenic and Autophagy Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were collected from the cultures, placed in the RIPA lysis buffer on ice (BestBio, Shanghai, China). The whole proteins were subjected to 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF; Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). The PVDF membrane was incubated with 5% defatted milk powder at room temperature for 1 h, then incubation with the following specific primary antibodies at 4℃ overnight: anti-FHL2 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti- MYOD1 (Abcam), anti-MyoG (Abcam), anti-MYH3 (Abcam), anti-ATG5 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-ATG7 (Cell Signaling), and anti-β-Actin (Abcam). The secondary antibodies HRP-labeled mouse and rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling) were added at room temperature for 1h. Following each step, the membranes were washed five times with PBS-T for 3 min. The proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA) with a Kodak imager (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Quantification of protein blots was performed using the Quantity One 1-D software (version 4.4.0) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) on images acquired from an EU-88 image scanner (GE Healthcare, King of Prussia, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!