The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using quanoptimize software

1

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Oxylipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Details of LC/MS/MS analysis can be found published by Mavangira et al., [23 (link)]. In short, the quantification of metabolites was accomplished on a Waters Xevo-TQ-S tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer using multiple reaction monitoring. Chromatography separation was performed with an Ascentis® Express C18 HPLC column, held at 50 oC and autosampler held at 10 oC. Mobile phase bottle A was water containing 0.1% formic acid and mobile phase bottle B was acetonitrile, the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. Liquid chromatography separation took 15 minutes per sample. All oxylipids were detected using electrospray ionization in negative-ion mode. Cone voltages and collision voltages were optimized for each analyte using Waters QuanOptimize software and data analysis was carried out with Waters MassLynx software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UPLC-MS/MS Optimization for Compound Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The test compounds were optimized on a
Waters Acquity UPLC XEVO TQ-S micro system (Waters Corp.) operating
in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with positive or negative
electrospray ionization. Compounds were optimized by using the QuanOptimize
software (Waters Corp.). The MS conditions listed in Table 2 were used.
For chromatographic
separation, a C18 BEH 1.7 μm
column was used with a general gradient of 5–1000% of mobile
phase B over a total running time of 2 min. Mobile phase A consisted
of 0.1% formic acid in purified water and mobile phase B of 0.1% formic
acid in 100% acetonitrile. The flow rate was set to 0.5 mL/min, and
5 μL of the sample was injected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-Throughput Compound Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All compounds to be screened are delivered from in-house Sample Management as 10 mM DMSO solutions in 96-well format. The compounds are diluted in a 1:2 AcN/water (0.1% FA) solution. We consider 1 μM optimal for optimization on the Waters Xevo TQS instrument and 5 μM for using the Waters TQD instrument. The QuanOptimize software (Waters) is used as a high-throughput tool for automated method development and batch processing of quantitative bioassays. The QuanOptimize routines can ramp and optimize cone voltage and collision energy. The cone voltage is set to 35 eV for all compounds and only the collision energy is optimized and ramped both in positive and negative mode between 10 and 50 eV in steps of six.
The software identifies the most intense fragment and the corresponding collision energy and creates an MRM transition, which is stored in an MS/MS library. The MS/MS library is shared between the LC-MS/MS instruments. QuanOptimize is also used for creating the sample list by generating MS/MS files from the MS/MS library combining up to 13 different MRM transitions, LC file, MS/MS tune file, and creating quantification methods used for peak integration, calibration, and quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimized UPLC-MS/MS Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The test compound was optimized on a Waters
Acquity UPLC XEVO TQ-S microsystem (Waters Corporation) running in
the multiple reaction monitoring mode with negative or positive electrospray
ionization using QuanOptimize software (Waters Corporation).
The column used for chromatographic separation was a C18 BEH 1.7
μm column, with 0.5 mL/min flow rate; 5 μL sample injection
volume; mobile phase A: 5% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in purified
water; mobile phase B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile; general gradient:
1% to 90% (for B); 2 min total running time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Oxylipids by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In short, the quantification of metabolites was accomplished on a Waters Xevo-TQ-S tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer using multiple reaction monitoring. Chromatography separation was performed with an Ascentis Express C18 HPLC column (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), held at 50°C and autosampler held at 10°C. Mobile phase bottle A was water containing 0.1% formic acid and mobile phase bottle B was acetonitrile; the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. Liquid chromatography separation took 15 min per sample with linear gradient steps programmed as follows (A:3B ratio): time 0 to 0.5 min (99:1), to (60:40) at 2.0 min; to (20:80) at 8.0 min; to (1:99) at 9.0 min; 0.5 min held at (1:99) until min 13.0; then return to (99:1) at 13.01 min, and held at this condition until 15.0 min. All oxylipids were detected using electrospray ionization in negative-ion mode. Cone voltages and collision voltages were optimized for each analyte using Waters QuanOptimize software and data analysis was carried out with Waters MassLynx software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Isoprostanes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification of isoprostanes was accomplished with a Waters Xevo TQ-S tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer using multiple reaction monitoring. Chromatography separation was performed with a Waters Acquity UPLC utilizing a BEH C18 1.7 μM (2.1 × 150 mm) column, held at 50°C, and autosampler held at 10°C. Mobile phase bottle A was 0.1% acetic acid and mobile phase bottle B was acetonitrile, mobile phase bottle C was methanol, and the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. The gradient initial phase A:B, 80:20 to 1 min changing to A:B:C, 50:30:20, to 7 min changing to A:B:C, 1:80:19, to 7.01 changing back to initial phase and holding until 10 min. All oxylipids were detected using electrospray ionization in negative-ion mode. Cone voltages and collision voltages were optimized for each analyte using Waters QuanOptimize software and data analysis was carried out with Waters MassLynx software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metabolite Quantification via LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glucose and lactate levels in the media were analyzed at time 0 and after 72 h using LC-MS/MS. An H-Class UPLC system and AQCUITY UPLC BEH Amide column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm particle size, from Waters) were used for the separation of glucose and lactate. UPLC separation was coupled with negative-mode ESI to a Waters Xevo TQ-S mass spectrometer operating in MRM mode. The LC parameters were as follows: autosampler temperature, 5°C; injection volume, 5 μl; column temperature, 50°C; and flow rate, 400 μl/min. The LC solvents were solvent A, 50 mM ammonium formate in water (pH 3) and solvent B, acetonitrile. Elution from the column was performed over 2 min with an isocratic gradient of 40% solvent A and 60% solvent B. The capillary voltage was 2.92 kV, and the cone voltage was 50 V. The flow rates of cone gas and desolvation gas were 150 and 600 L/h, respectively. The source temperature was 150°C, and the desolvation temperature was 500°C. Argon was used as collision gas at 1.5 mTorr. Collision energies and source cone potentials were optimized for each transition using Waters QuanOptimize software. Data were acquired using MassLynx 4.1 and QuanLynx software. The following equation was used to calculate metabolite consumption/excretion per 106 cells per hour, denoted as α:

where

and X is the cell number and t is the time in hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Isoprostanes via LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Details of LC/MS/MS analysis are described in Mavangira et al., 2016 [25 (link)]. In short, the quantification of metabolites was accomplished on a Waters Xevo-TQ-S tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Chromatography separation was performed with an Ascentis Express C18 HPLC column (10 cm × 2.1 mm; 2.7 μm particles, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 50 °C, with the autosampler at 10 °C. Mobile phase A was water containing 0.1% formic acid, and mobile phase B was acetonitrile. Flow rate was fixed at 0.3 mL/ min. Liquid chromatography separation took 15 min per sample. MRM parameters including cone voltage, collision voltage, precursor ion, product ion, and dwell time were optimized based on Waters QuanOptimize software by flow injection of pure standard for each individual compound. Total IsoP concentrations were obtained by addition of IsoP detected in each sample type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Total Glutathione

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC/MS/MS was used for the determination of total glutathione following extraction from 30 mg muscle homogenized in 400 μL deionized water (pH 7.0) containing N-ethylmaleimide. The protein precipitate was then reduced using Tris (2-carboxyethyl phosphine) and the extraction was repeated. An internal standard of 20 uM GSH ammonium salts D-5 (Toronto Research Chemicals, North York, ON, Canada) was added to all samples and standards. Chromatographic separation of the thiols was achieved using a Waters Acquity UPLC® HSS T3 1.8 μM (2.1 × 100 mm) column (Waters Corp. Milford, MA, USA) with a gradient elution consisting of acetonitrile and deionized water with 0.1% formic acid. Multiple reaction monitoring, optimized using Waters QuanOptimize software, was used for detection of ions generated by glutathione in the MS/MS detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plasma Stability Assay for Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assay was conducted at 37°C in single time point mode (60 min incubation) in triplicate. Test compounds or procaine were tested at a final concentration of 1 μM in either 2.5% DMSO / 97.5% mouse plasma (Bioreclamation MSEPLNAHP-C57-M; pooled filtered plasma from male C57BL/6 mice; sodium heparin as anticoagulant; pH adjusted to 7.4 with 2N HCl on day of use) or 2.5% DMSO / 97.5% PBS (pH = 7.4 PBS: 136.9 mM NaCl; 2.68 mM KCl; 8.1 mM Na2HPO4; 1.47 mM KH2PO4; 0.9 mM CaCl2; 0.49 mM MgCl2). Samples were analyzed with a Waters® Aquity UPLC (BEH C18 1.7 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm column) in tandem with Waters® TQ MS mass spectrometer. 5 μl of sample was injected with a 3 min linear 5% to 95% acetonitrile/water gradient in 0.1% formic acid with a 0.5 ml/min flow rate. Compound electrospray mode, capillary voltages, cone voltages, MRMs (one per compound) and quantization were optimized and determined using Waters® QuanOptimize software with propafenone as an internal standard. Standard curves (six concentrations from 0–1000 nM) were generated with room temperature PBS or plasma. In order to identify plasma-dependent stability effects, stability was expressed as % compound remaining (PBS). The reference compound procaine typically was 100% stable in PBS but was > 95% degraded in plasma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!