The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Synapt g1 hdms

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

The Synapt G1 HDMS is a high-definition mass spectrometry (HDMS) system designed and manufactured by Waters Corporation. It is a versatile analytical instrument that combines ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) with mass spectrometry (MS) to provide enhanced separation and characterization of complex samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using synapt g1 hdms

1

Native MS Analysis of SpaPR Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified SpaPRSTREP complex was concentrated to 20 μM in PBS/0.04% DDM, and buffer exchanged to 250 mM ammonium acetate, pH 7.5, complemented with 0.01% polyoxyethylene(9)dodecyl ether (C12E9) prior to native mass spectrometry analysis. Buffer exchange was carried out using Amicon Ultra 0.5 ml centrifugal filters with a 100-kDa cut-off (Millipore UK Ltd, Watford UK). Mass measurements were carried out on a Synapt G1 HDMS (Waters Corp., Manchester, UK) Q-ToF mass spectrometer [39 ]. The instrument was mass calibrated using a solution of 10 mg/ml cesium iodide in 250 mM ammonium acetate. 2.5 μL aliquots of samples were delivered to the mass spectrometer by means of nano-electrospray ionization via gold-coated capillaries, prepared in house [40 (link)]. Instrumental parameters were as follows: source pressure 6.0 mbar, capillary voltage 1.40 kV, cone voltage 150 V, trap energy 200 V, transfer energy 10 V, bias voltage 5 V, and trap pressure 1.63x10-2 mbar.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Wheat Proteome Profiling by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein spots from ‘Aroona’ and 12 ARILs were excised from 2-D gels; reduced; alkylated; digested with trypsin, chymotrypsin, and thermolysin; and then analyzed as previously described [40 (link)]. The protein spots from 10 standard wheat cultivars were excised from 2-D gels and digested in-gel with chymotrypsin. The digested peptides were subjected to nanoAcquity UPLC coupled with MS (Waters Synapt G1 HDMS, MA, USA) to obtain their mass spectra. The data were analyzed using a database containing 63,245 Triticum protein sequences from NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 12 October 2015) and 151,173 Triticum protein sequences from UniProt (www.uniprot.org, 12 October 2015). UPLC–MS/MS analysis was conducted at the NICEM (National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management, Seoul National University, Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Native ESI-MS analysis of αSyn and P1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WT αSyn and ΔP1 αSyn samples with a final concentration of 20 μM were prepared in 20 mM aqueous ammonium acetate buffer (pH 7.5). The P1 peptide was diluted into the buffer solution to achieve a final molar ratio of αSyn and P1-peptide of 1:10. Native ESI-MS analysis was performed on a Synapt G1 HDMS instrument (Waters Corp., Wilmslow, UK). All samples were analysed using positive ionisation ESI with a spray capillary voltage of 1.2 kV. The following instrumental parameters were used: source temperature 30 °C; sampling cone 30 V; backing pressure 2.25 mbar; extraction cone 1 V; trap collision energy 5 V; trap DC bias 30 V; transfer collision energy 2 V. The system was calibrated with NaI cluster ions from a 2 μg/μL 50:50 2-propanol:water solution. Data were acquired over the m/z range of 100-4000 and processed by using MassLynx V4.1 supplied with the mass spectrometer. CID MS/MS experiments were conducted in the trap cell of the Synapt G1 mass spectrometer with argon gas, the collision energy was applied increasingly to the trap cell from 5 to 60 V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Peptide Mapping for Payload Conjugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Investigation of the payload conjugation site was performed by peptide mapping analysis using a slightly modified RapiGest SF Surfactant care and use protocol (Waters, Milford, MA). Briefly, 10 μg of each sample was mixed with RapiGest 0.1% final concentration and reduced for 30 min at 60 °C with 5 mM Dithiothreitol. Alkylation was performed with 15 mM iodoacetamide for 30 min at RT. Finally 1.5 μL of a 1 μg/μl trypsin solution were added and incubated overnight at 37 °C. After digestion, the sample was acidified by addition of 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid and analyzed by Nano-LC-MSe using a nanoAcquity UPLC coupled to a Synapt G1 HDMS (Waters, Milford, MA) operated in MSe mode. 0.1% formic acid in water was used as solvent A and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile as solvent B. Tryptic peptides were injected and trapped for 3 min on a Symmetry C18 pre-column (5 μm, 180 μm × 20 mm, Waters, Milford, MA) with a flow rate of 10 μl/min. Separation was performed using an UPLC 1.7 μm BEH130 column (C18, 75 μm × 100 mm, Waters) with a flow rate of 450 nl/min, starting with 2% B from 0 to 2 min followed by a linear gradient from 8–35% B for 67 min. The used MSe mode combines an alternating MS and MSe (full mass range fragmentation) function each second. Spectra were acquired from m/z 50 to 1600 and extracted ion chromatograms were analyzed manually.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Native and Denatured Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In short, native MS was performed on a Synapt G1 HDMS instrument (Waters Corporation) equipped with a 32k RF generator or on a Thermo Scientific Exactive Plus extended mass range (EMR) with a rear-entry ion source (REIS)49 (link). IM data were processed using PULSAR55 (link). Mole fraction was determined from deconvolution of mass spectra with UniDec57 (link). Denatured MS was performed on the front end of the REIS-orbitrap. Tryptic digest analysis and protein sequencing was performed on Thermo Orbitrap Fusion. Further details can be found in Supplementary Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Native Mass Spectrometry of SOD1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified SOD1 samples with pre-conjugated ligand were buffer exchanged to remove free ligand and diluted to 5 µM in 100 mM NH4OAc, 50% acetonitrile and 2.5% formic acid. Samples were incubated for 30 min at room temperature before being nano-electrosprayed. Spectra were externally calibrated using a solution of caesium iodide (10 mg/mL) in 50% n-propanol and masses were determined using Masslynx 4.1 software (Waters, UK).
Native MS analysis was performed using a SYNAPT G1 HDMS (Waters, UK) with parameters set according to previous work30 (link). Briefly, purified recombinant SOD1 protein was buffer exchanged into 200 mM NH4OAc (pH 6.8) using centrifugal concentrators with a 10-kDa molecular weight cut-off. Buffer exchanged SOD1 was diluted to working concentrations in NH4OAc, loaded into gold-coated borosilicate capillaries (made in-house), and subjected to nano-electrospray ionization (n = 1 electrosprays for 3 separate dilutions). All spectra were externally calibrated using 1 mg/mL caesium-iodide in 50% n-propanol (Supplementary Fig. 10), and were processed using Masslynx 4.1 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Native MS Analysis of LdmS Oligomeric State

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oligomeric state of LdmS was examined by native MS using a Synapt G1 HDMS (Waters) coupled to a nanoelectrospray ionization source. LdmS (1 mg/ml) was buffer exchanged into 200 mM ammonium bicarbonate using an Amicon Ultra-Centrifugal Filter (10,000 MWCO) at 4 °C. Protein was diluted to 0.2 mg/ml and loaded into platinum-coated borosilicate glass capillaries prepared in-house. Key instrument parameters were as follows: capillary voltage (kV): 1.65; sampling cone (V): 50; extraction cone (V): 2.0; trap/transfer collision energy (V/V): 15/10; trap gas (l/h): 5.5; backing gas (mbar): ∼4.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Native MS of AmtB-GlnK Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Native MS was performed on a Synapt G1 HDMS instrument (Waters corporation) with a 32 k RF generator. AmtB–GlnK samples were at a final concentration of 2 µM. Instrument parameters were tuned to maximize ion intensity and simultaneously preserve the native-like state of AmtB. The instrument was set to a capillary voltage of 1.7 kV, sampling cone voltage of 100 V, extractor cone voltage of 10 V, and argon flow rate at 7 mL min−1 (5.2 × 10–2 mbar). The T-wave settings for trap (300 ms−1/2.0 V), IMS (300 ms−1/20 V), and transfer (100 ms−1/10 V), source temperature (110 °C) trap collision voltage (20 V) and transfer collision voltage (160 V) and trap bias (35 V) were also optimized.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Intact Mass Analysis of Antibody Chains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For intact mass analysis of heavy and light chain, 20 μg of each sample was mixed with 1% mercaptoethanol final concentration and reduced for 30 min. at 37 °C. Reduced samples were loaded directly onto a CapLC-MS system (1100 series, Agilent Technologies) coupled to a Synapt G1 HDMS (Waters, Milford, MA) operated in MS positive ion mode. 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water was used as solvent A and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in 70% n-propanol as solvent B. The samples were separated via a Zorbax SB300 C8 column (3.5 μm, 150 × 0.3 mm, Agilent Technologies), tempered at 75 °C. The gradient started with 3% B and a flow rate of 10 μL/min followed by a linear gradient from 2 to 39 min from 10% B to 60% B. Protein signals were recorded with a DA-detector at 214 and 280 nm. MS spectra were acquired from m/z 500 to 3000. Finally, intact protein mass was calculated applying the MaxEnt1 deconvolution algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Destabilization and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of SOD1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified SOD1 was destabilized via incubation in 20 mM DTT 5 mM EDTA in 1 × PBS (pH 7.4) at 37 °C for 2 h, following which samples were buffer exchanged into 200 mM ammonium acetate using gel-filtration chromatography (Superdex 75 10/300 GL, GE USA). Fractions off the column were immediately placed on ice, pooled, and diluted to a final concentration of 10 µM SOD1 monomer (measured via BCA assay). Mass spectrometry analysis was performed using a SYNAPT G1 HDMS (Waters, UK) with parameters set according to previous work32 (link). Briefly, SOD1 samples at 10 μM in 200 mM NH4OAc were loaded into gold-coated borosilicate capillaries (made in-house) and subjected to nano-electrospray ionization. Results are representative of 3 separate unfolding experiments. All spectra were externally calibrated using 10 mg/ml caesium-iodide in 50% n-propanol, and were processed using Masslynx 4.1. For determination of the abundances of the observed conformations the area under the peak for each charge state was determined and the values plotted as a function of charge state. Following this, MATLAB R2014b (Version 8.4) was used to fit Gaussians to the plots and area under the peak was determined. Instrument parameters can be found in Appendix A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!