The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rat anti mouse cd68

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The Rat anti-mouse CD68 is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and analysis of the CD68 protein, which is expressed on the surface of macrophages and other myeloid cells. This antibody can be used in various immunological techniques, such as flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, to identify and quantify CD68-positive cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

44 protocols using rat anti mouse cd68

1

Quantitative Histological and Biochemical Assessment of Liver Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hematoxylin-eosin and Sirius red staining were performed according to standard protocols. For immunohistochemical analysis, liver specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin or 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated with rat anti-mouse F4/80 (Clone: A3-1, AbD Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA), rat anti-mouse CD68 (Clone: FA-11, AbD Serotec), goat anti-mouse Gpnmb (Clone: #297310, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and monoclonal antibody against α-SMA (Clone: E184, Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). For immunofluorescent staining, paraffin sections were incubated with rat anti-mouse CD68 (Clone: FA-11, AbD Serotec) and goat anti-mouse Gpnmb (Clone: #297310, R&D Systems). These samples then imaged with fluorescent microscopy. The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was performed on paraffin liver sections according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All samples undergoing immunofluorescent staining were labeled with ProLongR Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA). Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were measured with a commercial kit (SRL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were either stained only by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) or processed by immunohistechemical staining. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on 4 μm-thick paraffin-embedded sections. Sections were deparaffinised and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed (0.01 M citrate, pH 6.0) and sections were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Single-labelling immunohistochemistry was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions of the mouse and rabbit specific HRP/AEC (ABC) detection IHC kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Briefly, sections were stained with primary antibodies: mouse anti rat CD68 (AbD serotec, USA), rabbit anti rat CD4 (Novus Biologicats, Canada) and mouse anti rat CD8a (BD Pharmingen), washed and incubated with HRP-goat anti-mouse/rat/rabbit IgG, visualized with substrate-chromagen AEC, counterstained with haematoxylin and mounted with Immuno-mount (Thermo USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunostaining of Cerebrospinal Fluid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CSF samples (5 μl) were spotted on Superfrost PLUS glass slides (Thermo Scientific), dried at 37 °C, and fixed in − 20 °C acetone/methanol solution (1/1) for 2 min. Immunostaining was performed as described previously [45 (link)]. Primary antibodies were polyclonal rabbit anti-human myeloperoxidase (MPO, Dako, 1 μg/ml) and mouse anti-rat CD68 (Serotec, 1.67 μg/ml) to stain neutrophils and monocytes respectively, or mouse anti-rat CD45RA (BD Pharmingen, 2.5 μg/ml) and rabbit anti-rat CD3 (Abcam, 0.5 μg/ml) to stain B and T cells respectively. Fluorescent secondary antibodies from Invitrogen were used at 2 μg/ml. Nuclei were stained with 0.1 μg/ml DAPI (Roche Diagnostics) for 10 min. Images were acquired with a Zeiss Axio Imager.Z1 fluorescence microscope and analyzed using the Axiovision software 4.7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescent Staining of Rat CD31 and CD68

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence, samples were rinsed with DI water then blocked for 30 min in 5% normal donkey serum followed by incubation with mouse anti-rat CD31 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) or mouse anti-rat CD68 (AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK) at a 1:200 dilution in PBS containing 0.5% normal donkey serum for 1 hr. Following incubation, samples were washed three times for 5 min with PBS then incubated with Alexafluor488 conjugated donkey anti-mouse at 1:200 dilution in 0.5% normal donkey serum for 30 min. Sections were washed for 5 min in PBS, 5 min in 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole solution (DAPI; Sigma, 2 μM in PBS), and 5 min in PBS then post-fixed for 15 min in 4% paraformaldehyde on ice. For all CD68 staining, TBS was substituted for PBS except for during the DAPI staining step. 1–2 drops of Fluoromount (Sigma) were applied to each section and then the sample was covered with cover glass and sealed. Samples were imaged within 48 hr.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Xenograft Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The xenograft tissues (n = 3 for each group) were fixed with 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. The paraffinized tissues were cut into 2-μm sections and placed on frontier micro slide glass. The sections were deparaffinized by 99.9% xylene, following 100%, 95%, 70% ethanol and finally distilled water. The sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.2% trition in PBS, then blocked with 5% NGS (normal goat serum) for 2 hour, followed by incubating with a primary antibody, which was used at a final concentration of 5-10 μg/ml in 2% NGS and included: anti-mouse endothelial cell (MECA-32, BioLegend, California, USA), mouse anti-rat CD68 (AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK), anti-CD83 (Michel-19, BioLegend), aand anti-mouse CD8 (BioLegend, California, USA). Sections were incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4°C and then incubated with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) after washing with 0.1% Trition in PBS. The sections were finally mounted using DAPI Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, USA). Fluorescent images were captured by Olympus microscope BX53 using MetaVue software under the same conditions (10 or 1,000 ms exposure time, high & low limits, and scaling) and the signal intensity was analyzed with the threshold images that excluded the background signal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cell Purity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD68 expression was used to assess the purity of cell populations prior to array analysis. Cells were harvested using a cell scraper and washed with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Cells were permeabilised using Leucoperm (AbD Serotec) according to instructions and incubated with mouse anti-rat CD68 (AbD Serotec, clone ED1, 1:200) followed by goat anti-mouse IgG APC (BioLegend, 1:400) and analysed on a FACSCalibur (BD). Data was analysed using FlowJo (Tree Star). Quadrants were set using the mouse IgG1 isotype control (AbD Serotec, clone F8-11-13).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Neuroinflammation Assessment in Prefrontal Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the presence of neuroinflammation after peripheral LPS treatment, prefrontal coronal sections were tagged for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) or ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule (Iba-1) costained with CD68 as astrocyte and microglial markers, respectively. Free-floating sections were rinsed of cryoprotectant solution, incubated in antigen unmasking solution (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA) at 95°C for 7 min, and rinsed 3 × 5 min in 1× PBS. Sections were blocked in 10% donkey serum, 0.3% Triton, and PBS for 2 h and incubated overnight in primary antibody solution, including 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.3% triton, and PBS (chicken anti-GFAP: 1:500, ABCam, Cambridge, MA, USA; goat anti-Iba-1: 1:500, ABCam; mouse anti-rat CD68: 1:200, BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The sections were rinsed and incubated for 2 h in secondary antibody solution of 1% BSA in PBS (Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-chicken, 1:500, Jackson, Bar Harbor, ME, USA; Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-goat, 1:500, Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA; Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-mouse, 1:800, Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). After a final rinse, slices were mounted onto gelatin-coated slides and coverslipped with mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Macrophages in Kidney

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The kidney samples were washed in cold PBS and fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered formaldehyde overnight at 4°C. Then, the samples were cryoprotected in 1.1 M sucrose, embedded in OCT Cryomount (Histolab Products AB, Sweden; 45830), and stored at –76°C. Frozen kidney sections (8 µm) were prepared on adhesive slides, rehydrated, and incubated with 50 mM NH4Cl for 30 min. Thereafter, sections were permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min and blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. To identify macrophages, sections were stained with mouse anti-rat CD68 (Bio-Rad, USA; 1:100 dilution; MCA341R) overnight at 4°C. Next, the sections were incubated with an Alexa Fluor 660-conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 1:750 dilution; A-21055) for 1 h at room temperature. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Roche, USA; 1:10,000 dilution; 10236276001). The CD68-positive cells were analyzed using a Zeiss Axioscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) fluorescence microscope. The cells were counted in 30 randomly selected images of the renal cortex and averaged from 2 sections per individual. The cell numbers were calculated per mm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunostaining of Inflammatory Cells in OCT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analyses inflammatory cell distribution, OCT‐embedded tissue sections were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with the following primary antibodies for confocal microscopy: rabbit anti‐rat α‐actinin (Abcam), mouse anti‐rat CD68 (Bio‐Rad). The appropriate fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) were applied prior to mounting using Fluoroshield with DAPI (Sigma‐Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Rat Cardiac Inflammation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rat hearts were fixed in paraffin as published previously.12 Sectioning (5 μm) of the left ventricle was performed after the appearance of the mitral valve and sections between 240 and 260 μm were used. Masson's trichrome staining (trichrome staining kit, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), neutrophil content (anti‐granulocytes antibody, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), monocyte content (mouse anti‐rat CD68, Bio‐Rad ‐ former AbD Serotec, California, USA) myeloperoxidase‐ (MPO antibody, R&D systems, Minnesota, USA), CitH4‐ (anti‐histone H4 (citrulline 3), Antibody, Millipore, Massachusetts, USA), CXCR2 (CXCR2 polyclonal antibody, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA), and p65 (NFkB p65 monoclonal antibody, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) staining was performed and subsequently evaluated in five independent picture sections per animal. All sections were analysed using TissueFAXS (V4, TissueGnostics, Vienna, Austria) and ImageJ (V1.5) software. CellProfiler (V4.2.0) was used to determine the MFI of CXCR2 on neutrophils (defined via shape, DAPI, and MPO expression) and p65 translocation in MPO or CD68 positive cells (defined via shape, DAPI, MPO, and CD68 expression). All analyses were carried out by a blinded member of the study team.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!