The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using 2100q portable turbidimeter

1

Comprehensive Characterization of Water Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to biofilm growth and mixing experiments, the BML surface water and FFT pore water were characterized by measuring pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), major cations and anions, naphthenic acids (NAs), and turbidity (in surface water only). pH and EC were measured using a Fisher Scientific Accumet AR50 Dual Channel pH/Ion/Conductivity Meter. DO was evaluated using a YSI 52 Dissolved Oxygen Meter (YSI Incorporated, Yellowsprings, OH, USA). Major cation analysis was conducted at the Natural Resources Analytical Laboratory (NRAL) at the University of Alberta. Samples were filtered with 0.45 µm nylon filters and analyzed for Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ via inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) (Thermo iCAP 600 series, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Filtered samples (using 0.45 µm nylon filters) were analyzed for major anions (Cl, SO4-S, NH4-N, NO2-N, NO3-N, and PO4-P) at NRAL with a Thermo Gallery Plus Beermaster Colorimetric Autoanalyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). NAs were determined using Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) (Spectrum 100 FT-IR Spectrometer, PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA) following the procedure described in Ripmeester and Duford [31 (link)]. Turbidity was measured using a HACH 2100Q Portable Turbidimeter (Loveland, CO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Membrane Filtration for Wastewater Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Separation performance was conducted in a dead-end filtration cell, Steritech HP 4750 pressure membrane test cell (Sligo, Rathquarter, Ireland). The active membrane area in the cell was 14.6 cm2. The membranes were tested for pure water flux and turbidity removal with synthetic turbid water. The pressure was varied from 0.2 bar to 1.0 bar, while the initial turbidity was varied from 80 NTU to 140 NTU. The membranes were also used for the treatment of raw restaurant wastewater. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) was analyzed using a spectrophotometer, Hach DR6000 UV-VIS (Loveland, CO, USA), while turbidity was analyzed with a turbidity meter (Hach 2100Q Portable Turbidimeter).
The water flux was calculated using Equation (1), while turbidity and COD were calculated using Equation (2).
Jw=VAt
where Jw (L/m2/h) and V (L) are the water flux and the permeate volume, respectively. The active membrane area A is measured in m2, while the filtration time t is in h.
R=(CfCp)Cf×100
where R is the rejection in %, Cf is the initial turbidity or COD in the feed, and Cp is the final turbidity or COD in the permeate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Water Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free and total chlorine were measured using the N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DPD) Method (Pocket ColorimeterTM II, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA); pH and temperature (ExTech 407227, Extech Instruments, Nashua, NH, USA); hardness (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) Titration Method, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA); turbidity (2100 Q Portable Turbidimeter, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA); ferrous and total iron (1, 10 phenanthroline Method, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA); and absorbance and ultraviolet transmittance (UVT) of the test water at 255, 265, and 280 nm (DR6000 UV-VIS spectrophotometer, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analysis of Filter Rejection Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Some of the samples were kept before and after the filtration test in order to conduct rejection analysis. Rejection analysis was divided under several tests, which are rejection of oil, total organic carbon (TOC) and turbidity. They were measured using UV-VIS Spectrophotometer (Model: DR 5000 Spectrophotometer, Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA), Hach-Lange kits for COD, TOC analyzer (Model: TOC-VCSH, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and turbidity meter (Model: 2100Q Portable Turbidimeter, Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Wastewater Analysis of COVID-19 Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wastewater samples were first filtered through 0.45 μm syringe filter and then measured for total dissolved organic carbon (DOC) using Fusion TOC UV/Persulfate Analyzer (Teledyne Tekmar, Mason, OH). pH and conductivity were measured with HI-98136 portable meter (Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI). Turbidity was measured with 2100Q portable turbidimeter (Hach, Loveland, CO). To explore the association of water quality parameters (i.e., DOC, pH, turbidity and conductivity) with reported abundance of nucleocapsid genes, a regression analysis was conducted. A multivariable model of the log abundance of nucleocapsid genes against the water quality parameters and reported number COVID-19 patients was carried out, and the strength of association reported.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Solubility of Pyrazole Compounds at pH Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

EXAMPLE 3

This Example illustrates the solubility of compounds of formulae (I) and (II) at various pH levels in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

Solutions comprising (1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methanol and 3,5-dimethylpyrazole at various pH levels were prepared by dissolving the corresponding pyrazole (2 grams) in deionized water (98 grams). The solutions were adjusted to the desired pH by adding dilute sulfuric acid or aqueous sodium hydroxide (1 N). The turbidity of each solution was measured using a HACH 2100Q Portable Turbidimeter.

As shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, the measured turbidity for all analyzed solutions was less than 7 NTU, confirming that (1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methanol and 3,5-dimethylpyrazole are water soluble and can be formulated at a wide-range of pH levels.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Solution Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each unit, pH measurements were made using a SevenMultiTM pH-meter with an InLabTM Micro Pro glass electrode (Mettler-Toledo, Viroflay, France). Measures were preceded and followed by instrument validation using standard buffer solution of pH 4 and pH 7 (HANNAH® Instrument, Tannerries, France). Osmolality was measured for each solution using an osmometer Model 2020 Osmometer® (Advanced instruments Inc., Radiometer, SAS, Neuilly Plaisance, France). Turbidity was measured using a 2100Q Portable Turbidimeter (Hach Lange, Marne La Vallée, France), by pooling the five samples per analysed experimental condition and assay time to obtain the necessary volume for the analysis. The results were expressed in Formazin Nephelometric Units (FNU).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Osmolality, pH, and Turbidity Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each unit, osmolality was measured using Model 2020 osmometer (Advanced instruments Inc., Radiometer, SAS, Neuilly Plaisance, France). pH measurements were made with a SevenMultiTM pH-meter with an InLabTM Micro Pro glass electrode (Mettler-Toledo, Viroflay, France).
Turbidity was measured using a 2100Q Portable Turbidimeter (Hach Lange, Marne La Vallée, France), by the pooling of four samples per analysed experimental condition and assay time to obtain the necessary volume for the analysis. The results were expressed in Formazin Nephelometric Units (FNU).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Situ Turbidity Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Turbidities were all monitored in situ using an HACH 2100Q Portable Turbidimeter and reported in NTU. The turbidimeter was calibrated using formazine prior to each sample collection. Three sub-samples were taken from the mixed sample from across the river, and three turbidity values were read for each sub-sample, providing a total of nine turbidity measurements for each sample site. The average value of these nine turbidity measurements was used in our analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Turbidity Measurement of Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Turbidity of the different solutions was measured using a 2100Q Portable Turbidimeter (Hach Lange, Marne La Vallée, France). In order to obtain the necessary volume for each analysis (>15 mL), four samples per analysed experimental condition and assay time have to be pooled. The results were expressed in Formazin Nephelometric Units (FNU).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!