The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Excel 2017

Manufactured by GraphPad

Excel 2017 is a spreadsheet software application that allows users to organize, analyze, and visualize data. It provides a range of features for creating and managing worksheets, formulas, and charts. Excel 2017 is part of the Microsoft Office suite of productivity tools.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using excel 2017

1

Comparative Analysis of Beef Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using Microsoft Office Excel 2017 and GraphPad Prism 8.0. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Comparisons of means were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Dunnett’s post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons, with beef set as the control group. Differences were significant when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Coculture Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented generally as mean ± standard error of the mean. Microsoft Excel 2017 and Graphpad Prism 7 (plotting and statistical testing) were used to analyse the data by one‐way analysis of variance with the Dunnett's post hoc test for comparison with controls if not otherwise indicated in the figures. Significance levels: ***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05, or n.s.: not significant. For expression data, ΔCq values were analysed for significance and transformed to 2−ΔCq. For all statistical tests, data from all cocultures from all mice inside an experiment were pooled.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were statistically analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2017 software and Graph pad Prism 5 software. Results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. The statistical significance was determined by an unpaired Student’s t-test. All statistical significances were considered when a p-value was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ACE2 Expression Analysis in Human Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Datasets were independently searched and analyzed by two authors (RC and JY), and any disagreements were discussed and resolved by consensus with the corresponding author (ZX). The data from the Allen Human Brain Atlas database and Allen Cell Types database were exported to Microsoft Excel 2017 and GraphPad Prism 6.0 for further analysis. ACE2 expression data from the Allen Human and Mouse Brain Atlas databases were imported to Brain Explorer 2.0 software to get visualization. The data from the other databases were analyzed online. Where applicable, data are expressed as median or mean. Interquartile range (IQR), 95% CI, range, and/or all sample points were also provided if possible.
Positive of expression criterion: (1) to minimize false positive of expression as previous studies (32 (link), 33 (link)), a gene with calculate counts per million (CPM), transcripts per million (TPM), unique molecular identifier (UMI) count, or fragments per kilobase million (FPKM) >1 were considered to be positive, which also is the same as log10 (CPM), log10 (TPM), or log10 (UMI) ≥0 as well as log10 (CPM + 1), log10 (TPM + 1), and log10 (UMI + 1) ≥0.3; (2) besides, as a z score being >2 corresponds to a p-value <0.05, a z score of ACE2 expression >2 was considered as high ACE2 expression in the Allen Human Brain Atlas database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Significant differences were assessed by two-tailed Student’s test. Two-sided P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed with Excel 2017 and GraphPad Prism 8.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistics underlying the graphs and charts were analyzed by Excel 2017 and Prism (version 5, GraphPad). All experiments were independently performed in triplicate at least, indicated in the corresponding figure legend. Images were combined and annotated in Adobe Photoshop (version 2019).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used Excel 2017 software for the data statistics, and the data drawing application Graphpad Prism 8.4.3. We used SPSS 21.0 (IBMCorp., Armonk, NY, USA) software to analyze the significant differences in the data based on the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan methods, and the significant difference level was p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!