The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Oligoperfect

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

OligoPerfect is a laboratory equipment designed for the synthesis of oligonucleotides. It utilizes a proprietary synthesis technology to produce high-quality oligonucleotides with a focus on precision and efficiency.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using oligoperfect

1

Quantitative RNA Expression Analysis in Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from mice brains using the RNeasy Lipid mini kit
(Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and was reverse transcribed using the
RT2 First Strand kit (Qiagen) from 1 μg of total RNA.
Real-time PCR analysis was performed using the StepOnePlus real-time PCR
system (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). PCR reactions were performed in
duplicate on four independent sets of templates. Relative quantification of
gene expression for the gene targets was achieved by RT2Profiler
PCR Array Data Analysis version 3.5 (SABiosciences, Valencia, CA) using
β-actin as an internal control. Amplification was performed on a cDNA
amount equivalent to 100 ng total RNA. Oligonucleotides were designed
using Oligoperfect (Life Technologies, Carlsbad CA, sequences available upon
request). Relative quantification of gene expression was calculated by the
comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method and expressed as 2-exp
(ΔΔCt) using mouse β-actin as an internal control as
previously described.50 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR for PRDM9-dependent Hotspots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative PCR was carried out using the Eppendorf Realplex cycler and the QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocols, except that primers were used at a final concentration of 0.5 µM to help eliminate primer dimers in later cycles. qPCR primers were designed using OligoPerfect (Life Technologies) with 40%–60%GC and 80- to 120-bp product size (primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S1). PCR was carried out for 40 cycles followed by melting curve analysis, and all samples were run in triplicate. Cycle number was determined using the automated threshold analysis.
For estimating the total number of PRDM9-dependent hotspots per meiosis, an equal volume of MNase-digested input DNA was analyzed alongside the ChIP DNA. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were calculated by averaging the technical replicates. Percent input was calculated by using the formula: % Input = 2(Ct Input−Ct ChIP)*100.
To determine peak-to-valley ratios, the peak and valley primer pairs were assayed using five 10-fold dilutions of genomic DNA to compare amplification efficiencies. For each hotspot, after qPCR the Ct values for peaks and valleys were subtracted at each dilution and plotted against the template amount. Only peak and valley primer sets that had a delta-Ct slope ∼ 0.1 or less were used for subsequent analysis of the peak-to-valley ratio.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Porcine Renal Tissue RNA Extraction and qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs from porcine cortical renal tissue were extracted with a commercial kit (Macherey-Nagel, Hœrdt, France). Genomic DNA was removed using DNA-free kit and first-strand reverse-transcription (Applied-Biosystems, Saint-Aubin, France) was performed. Real-Time qPCR assays were performed on a RotorGene Q (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France). Porcine DNA primers were designed using OligoPerfect™ (Life Technologies), QuantPrim (Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Potsdam, Germany) and OligoAnalyser (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, USA); the sequences are detailed in supplementary Table S1. RNA was expressed as “relative to expression in healthy ctl kidney” determined with the Pfaffl method (expressed as the relative fold change), using β-actin, CYA62, SDHA, RPLPO and L19 genes as internal controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Recombinant Melioidosis Antigen Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The four serodiagnostic protein antigens BPSL2096, BPSL2697, BPSS0477 and BPSS1498 (see Table 1) were selected based on their sensitivity and specificity published previously by others and us [31 (link), 32 (link)].
PCR primers for the amplification of the BPSS1498 coding sequence were designed with the software OligoPerfect (Thermo Fischer Scientific, USA) and B. pseudomallei strain K96243 [35 (link)] as template. The primer sequence, the restriction enzymes and the expression vector used are shown in S1 Table. E. coli Top10 (Thermo Fisher, Germany) was used as a cloning host. The sequence of the cloned gene in the obtained plasmid was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The related information for the other three genes has been published in our previous article [32 (link)] and was added to S1 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nrf2-ARE Pathway Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An adapted version of the method of McDougall et al. [41 (link)] was used for primers design, qPCR performance and results analysis. In brief, OligoPerfect (Thermo Fisher, UK) and NCBI Primer-BLAST (USA) were used to design the primers for three genes belonging to the Nrf2-ARE pathway; Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), Heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), and NAD(P)H dehydrogenase quinone 1 (NQO1). Genes and primers information are summarised in Table S3. The expression of each target cDNA sample was normalised using two housekeeping genes (HPRT and β-actin) and calculated as a ratio of the untreated control samples. All target cDNA samples were run as technical triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Efficient First-Strand cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retrotranscription to first strand cDNA was performed using RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Themo Fisher Scientific ref: K1632). Briefly, 2000 ng of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis following manufacturer’s instructions. 5 ng of original RNA was used to perform fast qPCR using GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega ref: A6002) in a LigherCycler 480 (Roche) with the manufacturer’s protocol (Supp. Table 3). Primers were designed using OligoPerfect design (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and validated using in silico PCR (UCSC genome Browser) and Ensembl BLAST (Ensemble.org). Primers were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Supp. Table 4) and used at 0.5 μM final concentration. Finally, primer efficiency was tested using serial dilutions from a mixed pool of cDNAs from all the samples. All primers used showed an efficiency of 1.9 or above (Supp. Table 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Human Taste Receptor Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HUGO gene nomenclature of TAS2R is used wherever the gene is mentioned. The 25 hTAS2R PCR primers were designed towards the available human sequences from NCBI Genebank using the OligoPerfect software from Invitrogen (Burlington, ON, Canada). The details of the primer sequences are given in Table 1. Total RNA from untransfected hPASMCs, hASMCs and from T2R1 specific shRNA and scrambled shRNA transfected cells was isolated according to manufacturer's instructions using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Canada). The concentration and purity of the RNA was determined using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Canada). A small amount of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using SSIII RT (superscript III reverse transcriptase, Invitrogen, Canada). RT-PCR was performed according to previously published methods [12] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Total RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs from blood leukocytes and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen, Saint-Aubin, France) and a commercial kit (Macherey Nagel, Hoerdt, France), respectively. Genomic DNA was removed using DNA-free kit (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Saint Aubin, France) and first-strand reverse transcription (Applied Biosystems) was performed. Real-Time PCR assays were performed on a RotorGene Q (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Human DNA primers were designed using OligoPerfect™ (Invitrogen), QuantPrim (Universität Potsdam, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft) and OligoAnalyser (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc) with the sequences detailed in Table S1. mRNA expression levels in the samples relative to expression in day 0 were determined with the Pfaffl method (expressed as Relative Fold Change), using ribosomal L19, S9 and RPLPO genes as internal controls. mRNA sST2 levels were assessed using sST2/ST2L ratio (sST2 primer detected a common region of soluble and membrane ST2 while ST2L primer detected only the membrane region).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RT-PCR Analysis of Tumor MDR1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were excised post-mortem and RT-PCR was performed as follows: Isolated tumors were homogenized and processed for RNA isolation using the RNAeasy kit. Isolated RNA was further treated with DNAse. RNA was quantified and quality was evaluated using a ND-1000 NanoDrop spectrophotometer from ThermoScientific® (Wilmington, DE). Primer sequences for both the MDR1 (gene of interest) and GAPDH (housekeeping gene) were adopted from reference 57 (link). The primers were evaluated using the Invitrogen OligoPerfect™ for GC content, annealing temperature and primer-dimer formation. GAPDH was used as an appropriate internal loading control for RT-PCR. cDNA synthesis and subsequent PCR amplification was performed using the first strand cDNA synthesis kit. Finally, RT-PCR was performed on the tumor samples for each treatment using the LightCycler® 480 RT-PCR machine from Roche™ (IN, USA). The assay was run in 96-well optical reaction plates. Data was normalized to GAPDH and relative quantification method was used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

qPCR Analysis of Porcine Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA isolation was performed with NucleoSpin® RNA-XS kit (Macherey Nagel, France). Genomic DNA was removed using DNA-free kit (Applied Biosystems) and first-strand reverse transcription (Applied Biosystems) was performed to obtained cDNA. Specifics porcine primers were designed using OligoPerfect™ (Invitrogen), sequences detailed in Table S1. Amplification was conducted on an automated analyzer ABI PRISM 7300 (PE Applied Biosystems, France). PCR amplification mix was 2 μL cDNA at 5 ng/μL + 2 μL forward and reverse primers (500 nmol/L final concentration) + 10μL SYBR green (SYBR® green PCR Master Mix, Applied Biosystems) + 6 μL ultrapure H2O. PCR reaction was performed following manufacturer's instructions (hold: 10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles: 15 sec at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C, and finally melt). Finally, mRNA expression level in the sample was obtained with the comparative Ct method (and expressed relative to control, normalizing the target gene to an internal standard gene, L19 (RPL19)): 2-∆∆Ct, where ∆∆Ct = (Ct,T - Ct,R) x - (Ct,T - Ct,R) cb, with Ct,T the threshold cycle of the target gene and Ct,R the threshold cycle of the standard gene and where x refers the experiment point and cb to the calibrator point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!