The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lightcrafter dlp

Manufactured by Texas Instruments
Sourced in United States

The Lightcrafter DLP is a digital micromirror device (DMD) evaluation module developed by Texas Instruments. It is designed to provide a flexible and programmable platform for evaluating and testing DLP technology. The Lightcrafter DLP enables users to control and manipulate light patterns, which can be useful in various applications, such as optical metrology, projection systems, and research and development.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using lightcrafter dlp

1

Fly Turning Behavior Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fly’s turning behavior was measured with the fly-on-a-ball rig, as described in previous studies (Clark et al., 2011 (link); Creamer et al., 2018 (link)). The fly was tethered above a ball floating on a cushion of air. The ball served as a treadmill such that the fly could walk and turn while its position and orientation were fixed. The rotational response of the fly was the averaged rotation magnitude of the ball in 1/60s bins with an angular resolution of ~0.5°. Panoramic screens surrounded the fly, covering 270° horizontally and 106° vertically (Creamer et al., 2019 (link)). A Lightcrafter DLP (Texas Instruments, USA) projected visual stimulus to the screens with chrome green light (peak 520 nm and mean intensity of 100 cd/m2). The spatial resolution of the projector was around 0.3° and the projector image was updated at 180 Hz. The rig’s temperature was 34-36°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Fly Optomotor Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fly optomotor turning responses were measured and quantified using methods described in previous studies25 (link),92 (link),96 (link). Briefly, flies were briefly anesthetized on ice, glued to metal needles using UV-cured epoxy, and tethered so they could walk on air-supported balls. The flies were positioned in the center of panoramic screens that cover 270° of azimuth and 106° of vertical visual space92 (link). Using the monochrome green light (peak 520 nm and mean luminance of ~100 cd m−2) of a Lightcrafter DLP (Texas Instruments, USA), we projected stimuli onto the screens creating a virtual cylinder around the fly. Turning response was quantified by measuring the rotation of the ball at 60 Hz using an optical mouse sensor. Flies were tested in a warm, temperature-controlled behavioral chamber (34–36°C), which resulted in strong behavior. Turning responses were averaged over the duration of the stimulus presentation and over trials to create fly averages. These were then averaged across multiple flies. Tuning curves were created following the same analysis procedure as in T4 imaging data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Fly Locomotion Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a fly-on-the-ball rig to measure flies’ turning and walking speed in response to visual stimulation, as described in previous studies [31 (link),103 (link)]. Each fly was anesthetized on ice, fixed to a needle with UV-cured epoxy and placed above an air-suspended ball that rotated under it as it attempted to walk and turn. Rotation of the ball was recorded at 60 samples/sec at a resolution of ~0.5° using an optical mouse sensor. Panoramic screens surrounded the fly, covering 270° azimuth and 106° elevation. The stimuli were projected on to the screens by a Lightcrafter DLP (Texas Instruments, USA) using monochrome green light (peak 520 nm and mean intensity of ~100 cd/m2). Stimuli were projected such that the fly experienced a virtual cylinder [33 (link)]. The temperature of the arena was set to ~36° C to allow us to use thermogenetic tools and promote walking [31 (link),36 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cylinder Projection Stimuli for Functional Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All stimuli were programmed in Matlab, using the Psychophysics Toolbox55 -57 . Stimuli were projected onto a virtual cylinder that was placed on three flat screens using Lightcrafter DLP (Texas Instruments, Texas, USA). The spatial resolution of the screens was ~ 0.3° and the screen update rate was 180 Hz. The mean luminance for stimuli during functional imaging was 70 cd/m2. Image acquisitions were aligned to the stimulus by presenting periodic flashes measured with a photodiode. All stimuli were presented in 4-second durations separated by 4-second gray interleaves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Virtual Reality Fly Locomotion Rig

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We constructed a fly-on-a-ball-rig to measure walking behaviors, as described in previous studies (Clark et al., 2011 (link); Salazar-Gatzimas et al., 2016 (link)). Each fly was anesthetized on ice and glued to a surgical needle using UV epoxy. The fly was then placed above a freely turning ball which the fly can grip and steer as if it were walking. The rotation of the ball was measured at 60 Hz using an optical mouse sensor with an angular resolution of 0.5°. Panoramic screens surrounded the fly, covering 270° azimuth and 106° elevation. The stimuli were projected on to the screens by a Lightcrafter DLP (Texas Instruments, USA) using monochrome green light (peak 520 nm and mean intensity of 100 cd/m2). Stimuli were projected such that the fly experienced a virtual cylinder. For higher throughput we built 2 rigs with 5 stations in parallel, enabling us to run 10 flies simultaneously. Flies were tested 3 hours after lights on or 3 hours before lights off at 34-36° C to allow us to use thermogenetic tools (Clark et al., 2011 (link); Salazar-Gatzimas et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cylinder Projection Stimuli for Functional Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All stimuli were programmed in Matlab, using the Psychophysics Toolbox55 -57 . Stimuli were projected onto a virtual cylinder that was placed on three flat screens using Lightcrafter DLP (Texas Instruments, Texas, USA). The spatial resolution of the screens was ~ 0.3° and the screen update rate was 180 Hz. The mean luminance for stimuli during functional imaging was 70 cd/m2. Image acquisitions were aligned to the stimulus by presenting periodic flashes measured with a photodiode. All stimuli were presented in 4-second durations separated by 4-second gray interleaves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visual Stimulation Characterization of Retinal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visual stimuli were presented with a custom-designed light projection device (DLP LightCrafter, Texas Instruments) capable of controlling patterned visual stimulation at frame rates up to 1.4 kHz. All stimuli were focused onto the photoreceptor layer using the microscope’s condenser. The device used blue light (450 nm), and light levels are given in the text in R*/rod/s. M cones and S cones were stimulated at rates of 0.45 and 0.02 isomerizations, respectively, per rod isomerization. Light stimuli were centered on the receptive field of each recorded cell. We first measured the cell’s response to horizontal and vertical bars across different locations and then adjusted the position of subsequent stimuli to the position that maximized the response in each dimension. Spots of light were 200 μm in diameter, matching the size of the receptive field center for both CRH-1 amacrine cells and SbC RGCs (data not shown). Light steps from darkness were 200 R*/rod/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fly Behavior Experiments with Panoramic Visual Stimuli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were presented using a DLP Lightcrafter (Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX) projector. Three coherent optic fibers were used to direct the projected light onto three screens made of back-projection material, surrounding the fly 8 (link),38 (link). The screens covered the front 270 degrees around the fly, and ~45 degrees in elevation above and below the fly. The projectors were set to monochrome mode, updating at 120 Hz. Stimulus video was generated through Flystim (https://github.com/ClandininLab/flystim), a custom Python application developed in the Clandinin Lab 74 . Stimuli were mapped onto a virtual cylinder around the fly and Flystim generated a viewpoint-corrected video signal.
Behavioral experiments were performed 12–48 hours after eclosion, as described in the figures. Flies were cold-anesthetized and fixed to needles using UV-cured adhesive (Bondic, Niagara Falls, NY). Flies were then placed above air-suspended balls made with LAST-A-FOAM FR-4615 polyurethane foam (General Plastics, Tacoma, WA). These balls were 9 mm in diameter and weighed ~91.7 mg. The motion of balls was detected by a Flea3 FL3-U3–13Y3M camera (Teledyne Flir, Wilsonville, OR) and Fictrac software 75 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visual Stimulus Presentation for Fly Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visual stimuli were generated using PsychoPy and presented using a digital light projector (DLP LightCrafter, Texas Instruments). The stimuli were presented on a rear projection screen positioned 6 cm away from the fly head; the screen spanned 60° of the fly’s visual field horizontally and 70° vertically. The stimulus was updated at 60 Hz. Before being projected on the screen, the stimulus was filtered using a 472/30nm bandpass filter (Semrock) in order to avoid detection of light from the stimulus by the microscope. Voltage signals from the imaging software were relayed to PsychoPy via a LabJack device, in order to synchronize the stimulus and the imaging frames.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Micropatterning for Cell Migration Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micropatterned coverslips were prepared as described by Azioune et al.69 (link): O2 plasma-cleaned coverslips were incubated with 0.1 mg/ml of PLL-g-PEG (Surface Solutions, Switzerland) in 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4 for 1 h. They were then exposed to deep UV through micropatterned quartz/chrome photomasks (Toppan, Round Rock, TX) for 5 min, and incubated with fibronectin in 100 mM NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) for 1 h. Releasable micropatterns were prepared similarly, with PLL-PEG being replaced by azido-PLL-g-PEG (APP) at 100 µg/ml. Migration was released by addition of 20 µM BCN-RGD for 10 min. Before imaging, cells were dissociated using Versene (Life Technologies) and seeded for adhesion on the previously mentioned coverslips for at least 2 h. Experiments were performed at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in a heating chamber (Pecon, Meyer Instruments, Houston, TX) placed on an inverted microscope model No. IX71 equipped with a ×60 objective with NA 1.45 (Olympus, Melville, NY) and a Luca R camera (Andor, Belfast, UK). The microscope was controlled with the Metamorph software (Molecular Devices, Eugene, OR). TIRF images were acquired using an azimuthal TIRF module (iLas2; Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ). Optogenetics stimulations were performed every 30−40 s with a DMD in epi-mode (DLP Light Crafter, Texas Instruments) illuminated with a SPECTRA Light Engine (Lumencor, Beaverton, OR USA) at 440 ± 10 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!