The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 protocols using ptprm

1

Investigating FAK and Wnt3a Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blots were performed as described previously[39 (link)]. The following antibodies were used: p-FAK(Y925), p90RSK2, p-p90RSK (S380), p-p90RSK (T359/S363), connexin43, NEDD9, p-Src, Src, p-JNK(Cell Signaling Technologies), p-FAK (Y576/577), Wnt3a, PTPRM, GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p120-catenin (BD Biosciences), E-cadherin (TaKaRa Bio), SOX9 (Abcam), PTPRM (CHEMICON). To detect secreted Wnt3a from antagomiR treated cells, equal volumes of cell culture media were concentrated using Protein Concentrator, 9K MWCO (Thermo Scientific Pierce) and separated by SDS-PAGE using standard methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of PTPRM in Ovarian Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five-micrometer sections of paraffin-embedded human EOCs, borderline tumors, benign tumors, and normal ovarian tissues were prepared for staining. After dewaxing, the sections were rehydrated, then antigen retrieval and endogenous peroxidase blocking were performed. The slides were incubated with monoclonal antibodies (PTPRM: Santa Cruz, 1:200) overnight at 4 °C. The sections were then incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:100) followed by horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin. Antigens were detected with peroxidase substrate and counterstained with hematoxylin.The primary antibody was replaced with phosphate buffered saline(PBS) as the negative control.Immunohistochemical staining of all sections was performed under the same conditions and at the same staining time. PTPRM was localized in the cytoplasm and/or nucleus, and cells with brownish-yellow coloration in the cytoplasm and/or nucleus were considered positive cells.Each specimen was randomly selected from 10 fields of view under a 400 × light microscope, and the number of positive cells in the 100 cells of the fields was counted(If the total number of cells in one field was less than 100, then 100 cells were counted in the adjacent two fields). The average number of positive cells was taken as the positive percentage, and if the number was greater than 30%, it was considered positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!