The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using omegawax 250

1

Quantifying Lipid Composition in Mouse Milk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lipid composition of mouse milk was measured using a capillary GC method46 (link),47 (link). In brief, the gastric contents of offspring at D16 were collected and total lipids were extracted using the Bligh and Dyer method with chloroform–methanol (1:1) solution48 (link). Fatty acids in total lipids were methylated using boron trifluoride-methanol solution (14% w/v, #B1252, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and C8–C24 fatty acids were identified using a capillary gas chromatograph–flame ionization detector (#6890 N, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with Omegawax-250 (30 × 0.25 mm, df 0.25 μm, #24136, Sigma-Aldrich). C23:0 methyl ester (#91478, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as the internal standard. The coefficient of variation using this method was 0.4–9.9%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GC-MS Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of FAMEs was carried out on a Clarus 580 system PerkinElmer, Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a quadrupole analyzer Clarus SQ 8 C mass-selective detector (Waltham, MA, USA). All analyses of FAMEs were done using Omegawax 250 (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany) column with a stationary phase of intermediate polarity (30 m × 0.25 mm, sorbent thickness—0.25 μm). The injector temperature has been set to +280 °C; automatic injection using an autosampler, injection volume 0.5 μL; split ration 4:1. The initial oven temperature was maintained at 75 °C for 2 min, then raised to 150 °C (rate of 20 °C min−1), then increased to 270 °C (rate of 4 °C min−1). Helium (ultra-high purity 5.0 grade—99.999%) was used as a carrier gas at the initial flow rate of 2.0 min−1 and then held constant at 1.0 min−1 with the split ratio 4:1. The total separation time was 35.75 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying GRB2 Inhibitor Binding Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NHD2-15 was resuspended in DMSO at 25 mM. CN filtration assays were performed with 4 μM GRB2 incubated with either 8 μM SH2 domain inhibitor (KD = 400 nM) [37 (link)], 16 μM SH3 inhibitor (KD = 4 μM) [38 (link)], both inhibitors, or neither inhibitor (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 0.5 h in TBS with 0.5% DMSO. Afterwards, antagonist was added at a final concentration of 25 μM and allowed to incubate for an additional 0.5 h at room temperature. The solution was then passed through a 0.2 μm CN syringe filter (Thermo Fisher) and was analyzed via an HP 6890 series gas chromatograph (GC) flame ionization detector (FID) with an omegawax 250 column (Sigma Aldrich). Standard calibration curves were obtained via GC-FID analysis of varying drug concentrations of 100, 75, 50, 25, and 0 μM. Response versus concentration was plotted and linear regression analysis utilized to determine the final concentration of antagonist in the filtrate solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fatty Acid Profiling from Plasma Lipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lipid fraction was extracted from plasma following the addition of 20 volumes of chloroform/methanol (2:1) according to the method of Folch et al. 28 All the samples were supplemented with a solution of tricosanoic acid (23:0 free fatty acid) in chloroform as an internal standard. Methyl esterification of each fatty acid was conducted using sodium-methoxide and methanol base-boron trifluoride. The fatty acid composition was determined with gas chromatography (GC-2010 Plus, Shimadzu), using a 30 m×0.25 mm internal diameter capillary column (Omegawax 250; Sigma-Aldrich, St Luis, MO). Fatty acid methyl ester peaks were identified based on retention times (GLC-462; Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN) and quantified using the internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fatty Acid Profile Analysis in Semen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analyzed a pool of feed and supplemental FO to evaluate the FA profile (Table 2). Semen samples for lipid analysis were collected on days 120 of each period and stored at -80ºC until analysis.
Samples for lipid extraction were analyzed following the method described by Folch et al. (20 (link)). Once lipids were obtained, they were saponified with potassium hydroxide dissolved in ethanol for 45 minutes at 80ºC, then acidified with a 0.5 ml hydrochloric acid concentrate. The acids were esterified with boron trifluoride at 64ºC for 1.5 hours. FA composition was determined by gas liquid chromatography with a 30 mm capillary column (Omega Wax 250, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Temperature was programmed for a linear increase of 3°C per minute from 175 to 230°C. The chromatographed peaks were identified by comparing their retention times with standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Lipid and Fatty Acid Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood sample were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C and then separated into plasma or serum. Alpha-tocopherol was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Total cholesterol was determined by the cholesterol dehydrogenase (UV-End) method. LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol were determined by a direct method. We calculated non-HDL cholesterol as the difference between total and HDL cholesterol. TG was determined by an enzyme method. The remnant like particles (RLP) -cholesterol was determined by the immune adherence method. Cholesterol ester transfer protein activity (CETP) was measured using a commercially available ELISA kit (Daiichi-kagaku, Tokyo Japan). Apolipoproteins (apo A-1, B, C-3 and E) were measured by the turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA) system. Apo B-48 was measured by the chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). Serum fatty acids composition was measured by gas–liquid chromatography. Briefly, total lipids in the serum were extracted using the Folch procedure and fatty acids were then methylated with BF3/methanol. Transesterified fatty acids was then analyzed using a gas chromatograph (GC-17A; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a capillary column Omegawax 250 (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). Measurements of sd-LDL-cholesterol were performed using sd-LDL-EX “SEIKEN” (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Serum Fatty Acid Profiling Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On enrollment in the baseline study, venous blood was collected early in the morning after fasting for at least 12 h. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3500 × g for 15 min. The serum was refrigerated before analysis for fatty acid content. Serum DHA, EPA, and arachidonic acid (ARA) concentrations were measured by gas-liquid chromatography at a clinical laboratory (SRL, Tokyo, Japan). Briefly, total lipids in the serum were extracted using the Folch procedure, and fatty acids were then methylated with BF3/methanol. Transesterified fatty acids were then analyzed using a gas chromatograph (GC-17A; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a capillary column (Omegawax 250; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The weights of DHA and EPA (g/mL) as fatty acid concentrations were identified by comparison with known standards. Intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy values (coefficient of variation [CV]) were 3.2 and 5.8 CV% for ARA, 2.7 and 6.9 CV% for EPA, and 1.9 and 6.9 CV% for DHA, respectively [18 (link)]. In the statistical analyses, serum EPA, DHA, ARA concentrations, and the EPA/ARA ratio, which predict future cardiovascular events [19 (link)], were selected as serum fatty acid factors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Profiling Volatile Organic Compounds of Lactobacilli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The profile of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by L. paracasei 85 and L. buchneri 93 were determined using an Agilent 7890bsystem (Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with Agilent 5977 Inert XL MSD apparatus. The system was equipped with a fused-silica capillary column coated with a polar stationary phase (OMEGAWAX™250, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The bacterial culture with or without ZEN treatment was inoculated with Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). The vials were placed at an angle into the incubator. The VOCs were extracted with 50 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/divinylbenzene (DVB) fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) at 37 °C for 50 min. The absorbed molecules were desorbed into the injection port for 5 min at 250 °C. VOCs were separated with the following program: held 40 °C for 5 min, heated at 5 °C/min to 185 °C, held for 1 min, heated at 5 °C/min to 200 °C, held for 10 min, and then heated at 10 °C/min to 240 °C. Helium was used as the carrier gas. The MS interface and the ion source were maintained at 250 and 230 °C, respectively. Acquisition was performed in electron impact mode (70 eV) with the mass range of 30–300 m/z. Compounds were identified by matching mass spectra with the NIST14.1 library [2 (link)]. The analyses for each sample were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification and Identification of Lipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total lipids were quantified following the method of Folch et al. (60 (link)), modified by using dichloromethane:methanol (2:1) instead of trichloromethane:methanol (2:1). The fatty acids were transesterified to fatty acid methyl esters by acid-catalyzed methylation (61 (link)). Non-adecanoic acid (C19:0, Matreya LLC, State College, PA, USA) was added as an internal standard. Fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed by gas chromatography, using a Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus gas chromatograph (Shimadzu Europe GmbH, Duisburg, Germany) equipped with a capillary column (Omegawax 250, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and a flame-ionization detector. The carrier gas was helium at 1.30 ml min−1, with a split ratio of 1:100, and the injection volume was 1.0 μl. The initial column temperature of 150°C was held for 7 min, increased at 3°C min−1 to 170°C and held for 25 min, and then increased at 3°C min−1 to 220°C and held for 30 min. The injector and detector temperatures were 250 and 260°C, respectively. Fatty acids were identified by comparing retention times with those of commercially available standards (Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix, BAME Mix, PUFA No.1, PUFA No.2, PUFA No.3, Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC; GLC-110 Mixture, Matreya LLC) and quantified by using the internal standard (C19:0). Analyses were run in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Serum DHA and EPA Measurement by Gas Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Upon enrolment in the second wave of the NILS-LSA, venous blood was collected early in the morning after fasting for at least 12 h. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3500 g for 15 min. Serum was separated and frozen at −80 °C before analysis for FA content by a single technician. Serum DHA and EPA were measured by gas-liquid chromatography at a clinical laboratory (SRL, Tokyo, Japan). In brief, total lipids in the serum were extracted using the Folch procedure and FAs were then methylated with BF3/methanol. Transesterified FAs were then analyzed using a gas chromatograph (GC-17A; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a capillary column (Omegawax 250; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The weights of DHA and EPA (g/ml) as FA concentrations were identified by comparison with known standards. Intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy values (coefficient of variation (CV)) were 2.7 and 6.9 CV% for EPA, and 1.9 and 6.9 CV% for DHA, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!