The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tq s mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The TQ-S mass spectrometer is a core analytical instrument manufactured by Waters Corporation. It is designed to perform high-sensitivity, high-resolution mass analysis of a wide range of chemical compounds. The TQ-S utilizes triple quadrupole technology to provide precise quantitative and qualitative analysis capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

25 protocols using tq s mass spectrometer

1

UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Pharmacokinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of pharmacokinetic was conducted on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC System coupled with a XEVO TQ-S mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Separation was performed on a Waters BEH C18 UPLC column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) at 40 °C. The mobile phase, 0.1% formic aqueous solution (A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B) in proportions, was adjusted with a gradient elution programme (0 min, 40% B; 0~2 min, 40~100% B; 2~2.5 min, 100% B; 2.5~2.6 min, 100~40% B; 2.6~3.5 min, 100% B). The flow rate was kept constant at 0.3 mL/min. Chromatography of the RPDQ and IS was performed within 3.5 min. The injection volume was 2 μL. The multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode was performed in ESI+. The main parameters were as follows: capillary voltage: 3000 V; source temperature: 150 °C; desolvation temperature: 300 °C; desolvation gas flow: 800 L/h; cone gas flow: 150 L/h; nebulizer gas flow: 7 bar; collision gas flow: 0.15 mL/min; cone voltage: 35 V and 28 V for RPDQ and IS, respectively; collision energy: 10 eV and 6 eV for RPDQ and IS, respectively. Masslynx V4.1 workstation (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used for data acquisition and processing [34 (link),35 (link),36 (link),37 (link),38 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of S-MRI-1867 by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic resolution was achieved on a Waters Acquity BEH C18 1.7 μm (2.1 × 50 mm) column at 60 °C. The mobile phase consisted of A = 0.1% formic acid in water and B = 0.1% formic acid in ACN, the flow was 600 μL/min. For the chromatographic gradient, mobile phase A was kept at 95% between 0 and 0.2 min and linearly decreased to 5% at 2.2 min before reversing to initial conditions in a 2.5 min total runtime. All analyses were carried out using a Waters Acquity I-Class UPLC interfaced with a Waters TQ-S mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) experiment operated with an ESI source at positive mode with spray voltage of 1 kV, temperature of 600 °C. The m/z of the precursor and product ions monitored for S-MRI-1867 were 548.1 > 145.0, 548.1 > 257.1, and 548.1 > 209.0, the cone voltage was 30 V and collision energy 48, 23, and 32, respectively. For the 13C6-S-MRI-1867 IS, the transition monitored was 554.1 > 145.0 using cone voltage of 30 V and collision energy of 48 V. Both Q1 and Q3 were set at unit resolution.
Concentrations of S-MRI-1867 were determined by a weighted (1/concentration2) least-squares linear regression method. The calibration range was 1.00–2000 ng/mL for plasma and tissue homogenate, and 0.50–1000 ng/mL for bile and urine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of GSH labeling kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to determine the labelling kinetics of GSH with IAM by MS, GSH (250 μM) was incubated in 50 mM (NH4)HCO3 (ammonium bicarbonate) buffer (pH 7.8) on ice and the reaction was started by addition of 20 mM IAM. The reaction mix was incubated on ice and samples of 20 μl were taken at indicated time points and mixed 1:1 with dithiothreitol (DTT) at a final concentration of 100 mM to quench the reaction, vortexed and instantaneously snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. For the zero minute time point, 20 ml of 200 mM DTT was incubated with 10 μl of 100 mM (NH4)HCO3 buffer (pH 7.8) and 5 μl of 1 mM GSH. As soon as 5 μl of 80 mM IAM were added, the sample was vortexed and snap-frozen. Samples were thawed on ice upon addition of 960 μl of MS sample solvent (20% ACN, 0.1% FA). GSH and GS-CAM (GS-carbamidomethyl reaction product) levels were measured by direct infusion into a Xevo TQ-S mass spectrometer (Waters, UK) operating in negative ion electrospray mode. Spectra were recorded in a range of 50–1200 m/z every 0.5 s for 1 min, while samples were introduced with a flow rate of 50 μl/min.
MS Parameters for the direct infusion of GSH and GS-CAM
ParameterSetting
Desolvation temperature150°C
Capillary voltage3 kV
Cone voltageset to 0 V (was actually 25 V)
Source offsetset to 0 V
The intensities for GSH (308 m/z) and GS-CAM (363 m/z) peaks were measured and the proportion was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Proteomics and Metabolomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were ground in PBS followed by addition of NP-40 to 1%, lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P (Millipore), and proteins were visualized using ECL (Pierce). Primary antibodies were against Acss2 (Abcam, 66038), TGIF1 (Wotton et al. 1999a (link)), Acat1 (Proteintech, 16215-1-AP), Mlycd (Proteintech, 15265-1-AP), γ-tubulin (Sigma, T6557), and HSP90 (Cell Signaling, 4874). Pcx was detected using Neutravidin-conjugated HRP (Thermo Fisher). Metabolites from normal small intestine (wild type [N = 4] or lacking Tgif1 and Tgif2 [N = 6]) were analyzed by mass spectrometry: Samples were prepared by derivitization with 3-NPH and analyzed essentially as described (Han et al. 2015 (link)). A Waters I-class Acquity chromatography system inline with a Waters TQS mass spectrometer was used for the separation and detection. Metabolite levels were normalized to total protein content in the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Colonic Metabolite Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Colonic content samples (80 mg, n = 6 per group) were mixed with 500 µL of methanol/water (v/v = 1:1) mixture and shaken by vortex for 30 min. Then, 50 µL supernatant that was collected after centrifugation (14,000 rpm, 10 min) was mixed with 50 µL of internal standard (5 µg/mL propionic acid-d2). Samples were derivatized with 50 µL 3-nitrophenylhydrazine (200 μM) for 30 min, and the supernatant was collected after centrifugation (14,000 rpm, 10 min). The resulting supernatant (5 µL) was analyzed on an Acquity UPLC I-Class system equipped with a BEH C18 chromatographic column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a Xevo TQ-S mass spectrometer [29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC/MS-MS analysis was performed using an Acquity UPLC System I-Class equipped with a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm i.d. × 100 mm length, 1.7 μm particle size) coupled to a Xevo TQS mass spectrometer (all from Waters, Milford, MA) used in electrospray ion positive mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lipid Analysis by LC-ESI-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipid extraction and analysis was done using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) as previously described (22 (link)). Cells were plated at 5 million cells per 6 ml and treated with SACLAC or DMSO for 24 hours. Lipids were extracted from cell pellets using an azeotrophic mix of isopropanol:water:ethyl acetate (3:1:6; v:v:v). Internal standards (50 pmol of d17 long-chain bases and C12 acylated sphingolipids) were added to samples at the onset of the extraction procedure. Extracts were separated on a Waters I-class Acquity UPLC chromatography system. Mobile phases were (A) 60:40 water:acetonitrile and (B) 90:10 isopropanol:methanol with both mobile phases containing 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid. A Waters C18 CSH 2.1 mm ID × 10 cm column maintained at 65°C was used for the separation of the sphingoid bases, 1-phosphates, and acylated sphingolipids. The eluate was analyzed with an inline Waters TQ-S mass spectrometer using multiple reaction monitoring. All data reported are based on monoisotopic mass and are represented as pmol/mg protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pharmacokinetics of Emvododstat in Rhesus Monkeys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Emvododstat-naïve, non-tumor-bearing rhesus monkeys were dosed by oral gavage with emvododstat (10 mg/kg in a lipid-based formulation). Blood samples were collected prior to dosing and at 0.083, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 72, and 168 hours post-dose. The blood was centrifuged, and the plasma was collected for subsequent analysis using Waters UPLC and TQ-s mass spectrometer.
Protein precipitation with an organic solvent was used to extract testing compounds from plasma before injection onto the column. In a mobile phase gradient of 0.1% formic acid in water and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile, emvododstat was separated using a Waters UPLC BEH C18 1.7 µm, 2.1x5.0 mm column and detected by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transition 465.6 → 127.3. The biomarkers were separated by ES-Industry Epi-Polar Column, 5 µm 120Å 10 cm x 4.6 mm, and detected by MRM transition 156.95 → 112.95 and 175.1 → 132 for DHO and N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate, respectively. Deuterated (D3)-PTC299 and deuterated (D4)-DHO were used as internal standards for emvododstat and biomarkers analysis, respectively. During sample analysis, each calibration curve spiked with emvododstat in the control plasma was analyzed with the test samples to determine the unknown plasma concentrations. The calibration curve ranged from 0.1 to 8 µg/mL for DHO and 0.002 to 2 µg/mL for emvododstat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

UPLC-MS/MS Quantification of VS-5584 and IS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Acquity UPLC system (Waters, USA), equipped with a UPLC binary solvent manager, an autosampler and column oven, was employed for the chromatography analysis. VS-5584 and IS were separated from interfering endogenous compounds via an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm particle diameter, Waters, USA) column under 25°C, with a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile and 0.2% formic acid in water (40 : 60) with a flow rate of 0.20 mL/min.
The mass spectrometric detection of the analytes was performed on a Waters TQ-S mass spectrometer (Waters, USA). MS-optimized parameters were listed as follows: nitrogen was used as the desolvation gas with a flow of 800 L/Hr, the desolvation temperature was set at 500°C, and capillary voltage was 2.5 kV. The MRM transitions of m/z 354.78 ⟶ 312.73 for VS-5584 and 410.64 ⟶ 366.65 for the IS were monitored under positive electrospray ion (ESI+) condition. The optimized cone voltage of VS-5584 and IS was 40 V, and the collision energy for VS-5584 and IS was 24 V and 32 V, respectively. Dwell time for both of the analytes was 0.025 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

UPLC-MS/MS Quantification of Compounds 1-3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A stock solution containing 64 mg/L of compounds 13 was prepared in a triplicate. An 8-point serial dilution was performed using 500 µL stock and 500 µL water. A Waters Cortecs C18+ (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.6 µm) column with H-class Acquity UPLC system containing quaternary solvent manager (QSM), sampler manager (FTN), and column manager coupled to a Waters TQS mass spectrometer was used for quantification. Acidified water (0.1% formic acid, v/v) and acidified acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid, v/v) were used as mobile phases A and B, respectively. The gradient was programmed as follows: 0 min, 25% B; 1 min, 35% B; 6 min, 55% B; 7 min, 95% B; 9 min 95% B; 9.01 min, 25% B. Initial conditions were held for two minutes as an equilibration step. The column temperature was 40 °C, the column flow rate was 0.5 mL/min, and the injection volume was 2 µL. Data were collected using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the following optimized collision energies and transitions: compound 1 (965.4 → 803.40, CE: 34v), compound 2 (983.47 → 821.57, CE: 25V), and compound 3 (981.39 → 819.39, CE 36V). The mass spectrometer was operated in negative ion mode with the following source parameters: capillary voltage 2.5 kV, cone voltage 20 V, source temperature 150 °C, desolvation gas temperature 500 °C, cone gas flow rate 150 L/h, and desolvation flow rate 1000 L/h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!