The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

87 protocols using lsrii sorp

1

NEAT1 Gene Knockout Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa, HCT116 and MRC5-SV cells were infected with pDECKO lentiviruses expressing fluorescent proteins. Control plasmids containing sgRNAs targeting AAVS1 expressed GFP protein (pgRNAs-AASV1-GFP + ), while the sgRNAs targeting the different regions of NEAT1 expressed mCherry. After infection, and seven days of puromycin (2 μg/ml) selection, GFP and mCherry cells were mixed 1:1 in a six-well plate (150,000 cells). Cell counts were analysed by LSR II SORP instrument (BD Biosciences) and analysed by FlowCore software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Surface and Intracellular Immunostaining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before staining, Fc receptors were blocked with a CD16/32 antibody at 1:50 (93; Biolegend) in PBS (pH 7.2) containing 0.5% BSA (Fraction V) and 2 mM EDTA for 10 min at 4 °C. For cell surface staining, samples were stained for 30 min at 4 °C with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Stained cells were washed in blocking buffer and fixed in 1% PFA in PBS (pH 7.2) with 2 mM EDTA for flow analysis or resuspended in PBS (pH 7.2) with 2 mM EDTA and 1 μg ml−1 DAPI (Biolegend) for sorting. For intracellular staining, cells were processed with BD Phosflow Fix Buffer I (BD Bioscience) and BD Phosflow Perm Buffer III (BD Bioscience) according to the manufacturer's suggestions and stained with primary fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies as described. Samples were analysed using a LSR II SORP (BD Biosciences) and sorted using an ARIA II SORP (BD Biosciences). Data was collected and analysed using FACs DIVA 8.0.1 software (BD Biosciences). All gating was determined using unstained controls and fluorescence minus one strategies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Leukemic Cell Culture Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
50,000 leukemic cells were cultured in 12-well plates with either no feeder layer, co-cultured on VeraVec in serum-free media or no feeder layer in 10% serum-containing media (all conditions supplemented with 50 ng/mL of sKitL). Following 14 days of culture, leukemic cells were separated from VeraVec by magnetically selecting the CD45+ population (Miltenyi Biotech, CA), blocked using 10% rat serum and stained with conjugated antibodies against CD34 (RAM34, BD Pharmingen), CD11b (M1/70, BD Pharmingen), Ly-6G (RB6-8C5, BD PharMingen), CD117 (2B8, BD Pharmingen), CD16/32 (2.4G2, BD Pharmingen). Stained leukemic cells were washed with PBS and analyzed with a LSRII SORP (BD Biosciences). All antibody staining was done at room temperature for 30 minutes. Gating strategies for flow cytometry was determined by single stain and fluorescent minus one controls. Dapi was used to exclude dead cells and use of a “dump” channel was used to exclude unspecific binding of antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Identification of Myeloid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were euthanized and eyes were immediately enucleated. Retinas, optic nerves, and spleens were dissected in ice-cold, filter sterilized HBSS (Gibco; 14175-095) and placed in HBSS with dispase (5 U/ml) (Stemcell Technologies), DNase I (2000 U/ml) (Worthington Biochemical), and SUPERase (1 U/μl) (ThermoFisher Scientific). The tissues were shaken at 350 rpm for 60 min at 37 °C in an Eppendorf Thermomixer R and then titrated with a 200 μl pipette to dissociate cells. Cells were centrifuged at ~ 3000 g for 5 min and suspended in a new solution by titration. Ovomucoid trypsin inhibitors (10 mg/ml) were added to the 2% BSA in HBSS block solution to inhibit proteases. Samples were kept on ice and protected from light for blocking and antibody incubations. Primary antibody solution contained anti-Cd11b, anti-CD45, anti-Cd11c, and DAPI. Samples were blocked for 1 h, incubated with primary antibodies in block solution for 2 h, washed 3×, incubated in secondary antibodies for 1 h, washed 3×, and then suspended in block solution for flow cytometry on BD Biosciences LSR II SORP. Tissue collected from the spleen and processed the same was used to guide analysis of the myeloid cell populations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained for dead cells (Zombie Aqua/UV/NIR Fixable Viability Kit; Biolegend), and then labeled for surface antibodies (see Table S2). For cytokine detection cells were permeabilized (Cytofix/Cytoperm, BD Biosciences) and stained with the indicated antibodies (see Table S2). Data were acquired on a LSR II SORP (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo (version 10.0.8, FlowJo Enterprise).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Purification of Microglia from Murine Mixed Cortical Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary mixed cortical cultures of glial cells from 3-day-old pups were generated and microglia were fluorescently labeled and sorted as previously described [18 (link)]. In brief, 17 days after plating, cultures were dissociated (HyClone Trypsin .25%; Thermo Scientific) and resuspended in FACS buffer: HBSS (Gibco; Invitrogen 14025) supplemented with 2% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, A7906) and containing 1 U/μl SUPERase In™ RNase Inhibitor (Ambion; Life Technologies, AM2694). Cells were centrifuged at 1305 g for 5 min and suspended in 50 μl of fresh FACS buffer to wash. The cells were stained for 1 h at 4 °C with chicken anti-GFAP (Abcam, ab4674) to label astrocytes and rabbit anti-IBA1 (Wako, 016-20001) to label microglial cells. Cells were washed three times and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with secondary antibodies: donkey anti-rabbit 647 (Invitrogen, A31573) and goat anti-chicken 488 (Invitrogen, A11039). Samples were re-suspended in 200 μl of FACS buffer and sorted on BD Biosciences LSR II SORP. Purified microglia were collected separately and stored in RLT Buffer (QIAGEN, 79216) at − 80 °C. Total RNA was isolated (QIAGEN, 74104) from purified samples from D2.C3ar1−/− and D2.C3ar1+/+ mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Characterization of Murine Myeloid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow cells flushed from long bones were syringed five times through a 23-G needle and filtered through a 100μm nylon cell strainer. Red blood cells were lysed with 0.15 M NH4Cl. Cells were resuspended in PBS and filtered through a 70μm strainer. Samples were incubated with Fixable Viability Dye eFluor780 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) and Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) at a dilution of 1:100. Cells were then incubated with anti-mouse CD115 APC, anti-mouse CD11b PERCP-Cy5.5, anti-mouse B220 Pe-Cy7, anti-mouse CD11c PE, and anti-mouse Gr-1 Brilliant Violet 421 (BioLegend) at a dilution of 1:100 in PBS/2% FBS. Samples were acquired on a FACSCanto II or LSR II SORP (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Analysis was performed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood-isolated or tissue-isolated leukocytes were stained using the marker-specific fluorochrome-labeled antibodies indicated in Supplementary Table 2. For intracellular detection of proteins, including FOXP3 (murine and human), IL-17A, Helios, Ki67, and GZMB, a FOXP3 Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Kit was used (ThermoFisher). For the assessment of intracellular IL-17A or IFNγ, cells were stimulated with 1 µg/ml ionomycin and 10 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) in the presence of 5 µg/ml Brefeldin A (all Sigma-Aldrich). After staining with anti-CD8 antibodies, the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences) was used for cell fixation and permabilization.
Samples were acquired using LSRII SORP, FACSCanto, or FACSCelesta instruments (all BD Biosciences) and analyzed using a DIVA (all BD Biosciences) or FlowJo (version 7.2.5, Tree Star) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive B Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used: B220 (RA-3-6B2), CD19 (6D5), Annexin-V from Biolegend, CD43 (S7), IgG1 (A85-1) from BD Bioscience, IgM (11E10), IgG3 (B10) and CD95 (clone Jo2) are from Southern Biotech. All assays were run on LSRII SORP (BD Bioscience) with 5 lasers and the FACS data analyzed by using FlowJo version. 9.7.6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Side Population Cell Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested and adjusted with fresh medium to the cell density of 1 × 106 cells per ml. Aliquots thereof were put aside for control purpose, and either Verapamil (20–100 μM) (Catalog number V4629), or reserpine (20–100 μM) (Catalog no. 83580) was added. Verapamil and reserpine are known to block several ABC drug transporters (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells are distinguished from debris on the flow-cytometric profile based on the forward scatter and side scatter (SSC). Cell doublets and aggregates are gated out based on their properties displayed on the SSC area versus height dot plot. Side population (SP) cells are recognized as a dim tail extending toward the lower “Hoechst Blue” signal. The gating tree indicates the sequential procedure applied to select out the final population for SP discrimination and the percentage of cells (gated events) resulting from each gating step. The gating strategy are represented as shown in Supplementary Fig. 8. Cells were filtered using 35 μm filter round-bottom FACS tubes (BD Biosciences) immediately before data acquisition on either an LSR II SORP or Fortessa (BD) and data analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!