The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Byologic software

Manufactured by Protein Metrics
Sourced in United States

Byologic is a software suite developed by Protein Metrics for the analysis and processing of mass spectrometry data. The software provides tools for the visualization, interpretation, and management of complex protein and peptide data generated from mass spectrometry experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using byologic software

1

Glycopeptide Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eluted glycopeptides were dried again and re-suspended in 0.1% formic acid prior to mass spectrometry analysis. An aliquot of glycopeptides was analyzed by LC-MS with an Easy-nLC 1200 system coupled to an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation. Peptides were separated using an EasySpray PepMap RSLC C18 column (75 μm x 75 cm) with a 275 minute linear gradient consisting of 0%-32% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid over 240 minutes followed by 35 minutes of 80% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. The flow rate was set to 200 nL/min. The spray voltage was set to 2.8 kV and the temperature of the heated capillary was set to 275 °C. HCD collision energy was set to 50%, appropriate for fragmentation of glycopeptide ions. Glycopeptide fragmentation data were extracted from the raw file using Byonic™ (Version 2.7) and Byologic™ software (Version 2.3; Protein Metrics Inc.). The glycopeptide fragmentation data were evaluated manually for each glycopeptide; the peptide was scored as true-positive when the correct b and y fragment ions were observed along with oxonium ions corresponding to the glycan identified. The relative abundance of each glycoform at each site was calculated using the extracted ion chromatograms for truepositive peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Muropeptide Analysis of E. coli Peptidoglycan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E. coli sacculus was digested with mutanolysin (Sigma-Aldrich) and the resulting muropeptides treated with sodium borohydride and desalted using HPLC. Muropeptides were incubated with LdcA enzyme and then desalted again by HPLC. Treated samples were subjected to nano LC-MS/MS analysis following the methods of Bern et al. (37 (link)). Individual PGN compounds were identified and quantified from MS and MS/MS spectra using Byonic and Byologic software, respectively (Protein Metrics). All MS data and associated Byonic and Byologic files are available for download via the mass spectrometry database MassIVE (MSV000087634). Data transformation, statistical comparison, and plotting were accomplished using custom R scripts, available along with raw and transformed data at GitHub (https://github.com/smit4227/ApLdcA_proteomics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Enriching Glycopeptides for Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before proteolytic digestion, trimers were denatured and alkylated by incubation for 1 hr at room temperature (RT) in a 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0 buffer containing 6 M urea and 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), followed by the addition of 20 mM iodacetamide (IAA) for a further 1 hr at RT in the dark, and then additional DTT (20 mM) for another 1h, to eliminate any residual IAA. The alkylated trimers were buffer-exchanged into 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0 using Vivaspin columns and digested with trypsin and elastase (Mass Spectrometry Grade, Promega) at a ratio of 1:30 (w/w). Glycopeptides were selected from the protease-digested samples using the ProteoExtract Glycopeptide Enrichment Kit (Merck Millipore). Enriched glycopeptides were analyzed by LC-ESI MS on an Orbitrap fusion mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific), as previously described (Behrens et al., 2016 (link)), using higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation. Data analysis and glycopeptide identification were performed using Byonic™ (Version 2.7) and Byologic™ software (Version 2.3; Protein Metrics Inc.), as previously described (Behrens et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides (1 μg) were analyzed by LC/MS/MS using a Thermo Fisher Ultimate LC and Fusion Orbitrap MS (San Jose, CA). Briefly, peptides were first loaded onto a trap cartridge (Thermo Fisher PepMap, C18, 5 μm, 0.3 × 5 mm), then eluted onto a reversed phase Easy-Spray column (Thermo Fisher PepMap, C18, 3 μm, 100 Å) using a linear 120-min gradient of ACN (2–50%) containing 0.1% FA at 250 μL/min flowrate. The eluted peptides were sprayed into the Fusion Orbitrap. The data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode was enabled, and each FTMS MS1 scan (120,000 resolution) was followed by linear ion-trap MS2 scans using top speed (acquire as many MS2 scans as possible within 1-s cycle time). Precursor ion fragmentation took place in the HCD cell with CE energies of 33 and 27, respectively, for general peptides and glycopeptides. Automatic gain control (AGC) targets were 2.0 × 105 and 1.0 × 104, respectively, for MS1 and MS2. The spray voltage and ion transfer tube temperature were set at 1.8 kV and 250 °C, respectively. MS spectra were analyzed by Byonic and Byologic software (Protein Metrics, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Peptide Identification and Modification Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Product-ion spectra obtained with the orbitrap mass spectrometer were searched for peptide identification using Byonic™ software (Protein Metrics, San Carlos, CA). For the FPOP data analysis, the false discovery rate was 1%. Modification sites on the peptide were assigned based on product-ion spectra (MS/MS data). The assignments were further validated by manual inspection of their accurate mass and product-ion spectra. Modification fractions for certain peptides were calculated with Byologic™ software (Protein Metrics, San Carlos, CA) and double-checked with Thermo Xcalibur (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Human Proteome Profiling Using Byonic

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Human FASTA database was acquired from UniProt. The Raw files and FASTA file were then inputted into Byonic software version v3.11.3 for proteomic analysis followed by extract ion chromatogram (EIC) using Byologic software (Protein Metrics, Cupertino, Ca, USA, version v3.11.3). Posterior error probability (PEP) smaller than 0.01, Score > 100, peptide length > 5, and 1% false discovery rate (FDR) were applied for proteomic data analysis. Multiple t tests were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA version 8).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analysis of BG505 and B41 SOSIP.664-E64K.M1M7 Glycopeptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 100 μg of the BG505 and B41 SOSIP.664-E64K.M1M7 trimers was reduced and alkylated and then digested in solution using trypsin (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) as described previously (42 (link)). Briefly, trypsin was added to trimers at a 1:30 ratio (wt/wt), and the mixture was incubated for 12 h at 37°C. The resulting glycopeptides were enriched using a ProteoExtract Enrichment kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). They were then dried, reconstituted in 1% formic acid, and analyzed by reverse-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using a Fusion Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled to an EASY nLC 1200 system with a PepMap C18 column (75 μm by 50 cm). Data interpretation and quantification procedures were performed using Byonic and Byologic software (Protein Metrics, San Carlos, CA), followed by manual assessment (42 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!