The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pirana

Manufactured by Certara
Sourced in Sweden, United States

Pirana is a software tool designed for pharmacometric analysis and modeling. It provides a comprehensive platform for data management, model development, and simulation. Pirana is a core product within the Certara software suite.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using pirana

1

PD Biomarker-Frunexian Concentration Modeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relationships between PD biomarkers (the ratios of aPTT/FXI:C to baseline) and plasma concentrations of frunexian were estimated by the Hill equations. The formulas for both models are as follows: aPPTbaseline=BSLN+Cγ×EmaxEC50γ+Cγ;FXI:Cbaseline=BSLNCγ×EmaxEC50γ+Cγ where BSLN, Emax, EC50, C, and γ represent baseline, maximum effect, concentration at which the effect achieves half of its maximal change, plasma concentration of frunexian, and the Hill coefficient. BSLN was fixed to 1 in this study. Visual inspection of goodness‐of‐fit plots, including the relationship between observed value and individual predicted value (IPRED) or population predicted value (PRED), and the relationship between conditional weighted residuals (CWRES) and PRED or time, was performed to assess the models.
NONMEM (version 7.4.0, ICON Development Solutions, Ellicott, Maryland, USA), Perl‐speaks‐NONMEM (PsN, version 4.8.1, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden), and the interface software Pirana (version 2.9.4, Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA) were used to perform the PD analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

NONMEM-based Pharmacometric Modeling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Model building and Monte Carlo simulations were performed using NONMEM (version 7.3.0; ICON plc),27 Perl‐speaks NONMEM (version 4.2.0; Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden),28 and Pirana (version 2.9.4; Certara, Princeton, New Jersey).29 R (version 3.5.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria)30 was used to calculate the PTA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Population Concentration-ECG Analysis Modeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assembly of the population concentration‐ECG analysis data set used SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling software (NONMEM® version 7.3.0; ICON, Hanover, Maryland) was used for modeling. All model development and final analyses were based on the first‐order conditional estimation method of NONMEM without interaction (FOCE). NONMEM was run through Pirana (Certara, Princeton, New Jersey) or Perl Speaks NONMEM (PsN version 4.8; Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden). R version 3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used for the analysis of the analysis data set, statistical summaries, and modeling results. R was also used for model‐based simulations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Parametric population PK modeling and simulation was performed using NONMEM (version 7.2, ICON Development Solutions, Ellicott City, MD, USA), Intel Visual Fortran Compiler XE 14.0 (Santa Clara, CA, USA), RStudio (version 1.1.456; RStudio, Boston, MA, USA, 2018), R (version 3.5.1; R foundation, Vienna, Austria, 2018), XPose (version 4.6.1; Uppsala University, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 2018), PsN (version 4.6.0; Uppsala University, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden, 2016), and Pirana [27 (link)] (version 2.9.4; Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2018). The fT > MIC and PTA were calculated using Excel 2013.
Nonparametric population PK modeling, simulation, and calculation of fT > MIC and PTA was performed using Pmetrics version 1.5.2 (Laboratory of Applied Pharmacokinetics and Bioinformatics, Los Angeles, CA, USA) [28 (link)], Intel Visual Fortran Compiler XE 14.0 (Santa Clara, CA, USA), RStudio (version 1.1.456), and R (version 3.5.1). The raw VPC data were imported from Pmetrics into PsN (version 4.6.0) using the Pirana interface [27 (link)] to generate VPCs with the same layout as NONMEM. VPC plots were subsequently created using XPose (version 4.6.1) within RStudio (version 1.1.456).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nonlinear Pharmacokinetic Modeling in R

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data management, plotting, and postprocessing of results were performed in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), partially using the Xpose package (Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden). The modeling and simulations were performed in NONMEM 7.4 (Icon Development Solutions, Ellicott City, Maryland), aided by PsN (Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden) and Pirana (Certara, Princeton) [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Midazolam Bioavailability Population PK Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oral bioavailability of a drug was quantified by means of a population PK analysis. All [14C]midazolam and midazolam concentration‐time data were analyzed simultaneously using nonlinear mixed effects modeling with NONMEM version 7.4 (ICON; Globomax LLC, Ellicott, MD) after log transformation of the concentration data. [14C]midazolam concentrations under the AMS detection limit (< LLOQ) were discarded.36 Pirana (version 2.9.7, Certara, Princeton, NJ), R (version 3.4.1, Vienna, Austria), and R‐studio (version 1.0.153, Boston, MA) were used to visualize the data. Model development was in four steps (see Methods S1 for detailed information): (i) selection of a structural model, (ii) selection of an error model, (iii) covariate analysis, and (iv) internal validation of the model. The absorption rate constant for midazolam was fixed at 4.16/hour, which yields peak concentrations to be reached in ~ 30 minutes, which is in agreement with the observed time to reach maximum peak plasma concentration in our data and with values reported for children in previous literature.13
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Population Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed effect modeling (NONMEM version 7.4.4) software provided by Icon Clinical Research LLC, New York, NY, USA, along with the Perl-speaks-NONMEM (PsN) toolkit (Lindbom et al., 2005 (link)). The execution and management of the model as well as report generation were performed with the aid of Pirana (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA) (Keizer et al., 2011 (link)). The actual process of modeling began with the development of one-compartment and two-compartment base models using the first-order conditional estimation method with interaction (FOCE-I) to obtain pharmacokinetic parameter estimates without any covariates. The allometric scaling function was used to evaluate the relationship between body weight and vancomycin clearance (CL) as well as volume of distribution (Vd), with a coefficient of 0.75 for CL and 1 for Vd. The exponential random-effect model was used to describe the between-subject variability (BSV) on pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, while additive, proportional, and combined residual error models were tested to describe the residual error between the observed and predicted concentrations of vancomycin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pharmacometric Modeling Software Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The population PK/PD analysis was performed with the NLME modeling program NONMEM 7.4 (ICON Plc., Dublin, Irland) (Beal et al., 2009 ). There exist several other software packages for parameter estimation of NLME models providing the same or similar algorithms. A variety of algorithms are provided in R Core Team (2019 , version 3.6.1). The software Monolix (version 2019R1. Antony, France: Lixoft SAS, 2019) and Diffmem (see https://bitbucket.org/tomhaber/diffmem/src/master/, Melicher et al., 2017 (link)) are based on the stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithm and the recently published package Pumas (based on Julia, see https://pumas.ai/) contains several deterministic and stochastic algorithms. Standard errors were computed with the $COVARIANCE step in NONMEM. Pirana (Certara, Princeton, USA) was used for the generation of the visual predictive check with auto_bin option. The simulations in section out-of-sample validation and simulation study were performed with the ODE integrator CVodes (Sundials, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore) (Hindmarsh et al., 2005 (link)) interfaced to CasADi (Optimization in Engineering Center [OPTEC], K.U. Leuven) (Andersson et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!