The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Aligner v9

Manufactured by CodonCode
Sourced in United States

CodonCode Aligner v9.0.1 is a software application designed for DNA sequence alignment and analysis. It provides tools for comparing and aligning multiple DNA sequences, allowing users to identify similarities and differences between them. The software supports various file formats and offers features for managing, editing, and annotating DNA sequences.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using aligner v9

1

Genetic Variant Screening for AIS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variants appearing in multiple families that were present in the GO functional categories for “cytoskeleton” or “extracellular matrix” (or related terms) were prioritized for genotyping. Additional enrolled affected and unaffected family members were sequenced at the variant site by the Sanger method to establish whether the variant segregated with the AIS phenotype.
PCR was conducted in 20 µL reactions containing 10 µL Premix D (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, USA), 0.2 µL Taq Polymerase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 60 ng genomic DNA, and 10 µM Forward and Reverse Primers. PCR reactions were run on a SimpliAmp Thermocycler (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a touchdown PCR protocol [38 (link)]. Primer sequences were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies and are provided in Supplementary Files S2. Sanger sequencing was performed by Quintara Biosciences and chromatograms were analyzed using the CodonCode Aligner v9.0 (CodonCode Corporation, Centerville, MA, USA, https://www.codoncode.com/index.htm (accessed on 16 June 2021)).
Pedigrees for each sequenced family are provided in Supplementary Files S1 and were created using PedigreeXP software (PC Pal, https://www.pedigreexp.com (accessed on 16 June 2021)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Familial Variant Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from additional affected and unaffected members of the family was Sanger sequenced in order to determine whether the variant segregated with the phenotype. PCR was conducted in 20 μL reactions with 10 μL Premix D (Epicentre Biotechnologies), 0.2 μL Taq Polymerase (Sigma), 20 ng genomic DNA, and 20 μM Forward and Reverse Primers. PCR reactions were run with a touchdown PCR protocol on a SimpliAmp Thermocycler (Fisher Scientific). Protocol and primer sequences are provided in Supp. File S1.
Annealing temperatures were set with the delta function to begin at 65°C and decrease by 0.3 °C each cycle, ending at 55 °C. Primers were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. PCR reactions were cleaned up for Sanger sequencing using ExoSAP-IT Express (Thermo Fisher). Sanger sequencing was performed by Quintara Biosciences and chromatograms were analyzed using the CodonCode Aligner v9.0 (CodonCode Corporation, https://www.codoncode.com/index.htm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Family-based Sanger Sequencing of Exome Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from additional affected and unaffected family members was Sanger sequenced across the variants of interest detected through exome sequencing. Primers were designed using Primer3 and obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. PCR was conducted in 20 µL reactions with 10 µL Premix D (Epicentre Biotechnologies), 0.2 µL Taq Polymerase (Sigma), 20 ng genomic DNA, and 20 µM Forward and Reverse Primers. PCR reactions were run with a touchdown PCR protocol on a SimpliAmp Thermocycler (Fisher Scienti c). Annealing temperatures were set with the delta function to begin at 65°C and decrease by 0.3 °C each cycle, ending at 55 °C. PCR reactions were cleaned up for Sanger sequencing using ExoSAP-IT Express (Thermo Fisher). Sanger sequencing was performed by Quintara Biosciences and chromatograms were analyzed using the CodonCode Aligner v9.0 (CodonCode Corporation, https://www.codoncode.com/index.htm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RBMX Variant Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from peripheral blood from 36 individuals in the extended pedigree (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Table 1). The region spanning the RBMX variant (NM_002139.4; c.484_486del, p.(Pro162del)) was amplified using 20–50 ng DNA, the RBMX_DNA primers and PCR protocol described in Supplementary material 1. Cycle sequencing was then performed using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions with cycling parameters: 96°C 1 min, 30x (96°C 10 s, 50°C 5 s, 60°C 30 s) 4 °C hold. All samples were cleaned up using BigDye XTerminator Purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bedford, MA, USA) and capillary electrophoresis was performed on 3130XL ABI Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA). The result was analyzed using CodonCode Aligner v9.0.1 (CodonCode Corporation, www.codoncode.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNA Isolation and Mitochondrial D-loop Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated using a commercial kit (GSure Blood DNA Mini Kit, GCC Biotech India Pvt. Ltd, Kolkata, India, Cat. No. G4626), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of isolated DNA samples were checked using a BioSpectrometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and DNA samples were then stored at -20°C until further use. Complete mitochondrial D-loop was amplified using the primers and PCR conditions described earlier by Yang et al. [34 (link)]. Amplified products were purified by using MinElute PCR Purification Kit, Qiagen, Cat. No. 28004 (New Delhi, India) and sequenced in both directions by Sanger dideoxy fingerprinting. The generated sequences were edited using Codon code Aligner v 9.0.1 (CodonCode Corporation, www.codoncode.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of HBV Genome Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In total, 146 human HBV genome sequences from 10 acute hepatitis B (AHB) patients and 150 sequences from 10 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, previously established as nonrecombinant, were selected [21 (link)]. B56 as a reference sequence was compared with 1061 HBV full-length genotype B sequences from NCBI GenBank to identify variations at the nucleotide level. Sequencing quality and data manipulations were analyzed using Codon Code Aligner v9.0.1 (CodonCode Corporation, Dedham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Molecular Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The third-generation cephalosporin- and carbapenem-resistant isolates were screened for the presence of genes encoding ESBLs (blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV) and carbapenemases (blaOXA-48, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM and blaKPC), using the quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) as previously described [26 (link)]. The qPCR positive isolates were confirmed by conventional PCR. The genetic variant of the carbapenemase genes was determined by sequencing of the positive PCR amplicons in both directions using the same set of standard PCR primers with BigDye Terminator on an automated ABI 3500XL genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the previously described protocol [27 ]. The generated raw-read sequences were assembled using codon code aligner, v 9.0.1 (Codon Code Corp., Centerville, MA, USA). The assembled sequences were identified by Blast analysis against the ARG-ANNOT (Antibiotic Resistance Gene-ANNOTation) database [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!