The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using nanopartica sz 100

1

Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticle Suspensions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic diameter (z-average) of MGPs in suspension was determined by dynamic light scattering with a particle size analyser Horiba Nanopartica SZ-100 (Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan). Samples were measured at least 10 times.
Measurements were conducted at a scattering angle of 173°a nd at 22.0 ± 1 °C. The particle had a z-average of 77.0 ± 12.8 nm and a polydispersity index of 2.64 ± 0.59.
The zeta-potential of MGP suspensions containing 1 wt% MGPs was determined using the particle size analyser Horiba Nanopartica SZ-100 (Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan), at pHvalues 4, 3, and 2 without adjusting the electric conductivity (EC) of the water phase. Additionally, the EC MGP suspensions at pH 4 were adjusted to 0.65 mS cm -1 and 6.5 mS cm -1 with a saturated NaCl solution prior to the zeta-potential measurements. The zeta-potential of MGP suspensions at pH 3 and EC 6.5 mS cm -1 was also determined. Three measurements of 10 runs were conducted at 25 °C for each solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing rPF4 Tetramerization and Complexation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The secreted rPF4 tetramerization and rPF4-heparin complex formation were studied using dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique (Nanopartica SZ 100; HORIBA Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) with a fixed 173 scattering angle and a 633-nm helium-neon laser. Data were analyzed using a Horiba SZ 100 apparatus for Windows [Z Type] software version 2.20 (Nanopartica SZ 100; HORIBA Ltd, Kyoto, Japan). Furthermore, Zeta potential experiments were performed, employing Horiba SZ 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SiO2 Precipitation Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A solution was prepared for the SiO2 precipitation test by dissolving TMAB (5.25 g) and NaNO3 (0.852 g) in a mixture of ultrapure water (100 mL) and ethanol (100 mL). TEOS (15.2 mL) was then added into the solution after the pH was adjusted to 3 with HCl (1.0 M). After 2 h of stirring, NaOH aqueous solution (10 mM) was added drop by drop to increase the pH. With every increase in pH of 0.5, the UV-Vis absorption spectrum and dynamic light scattering (DLS) of the solution were measured using a JASCO UV-Vis V-770 (wavelength range of 200 nm to 2700 nm with a scan speed of 400 nm min−1) and HORIBA nanoPartica SZ-100, respectively. For the DLS measurement, the diameter of the precipitates was determined from the average of 10 measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Physicochemical Characterization of Hydrochar

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BET surface area of the hydrochar was measured using the Smartsorb 92/93 surface area analyzer. The point of zero charge was determined using the pH drift method. The functional groups prevailing in the samples were determined using FTIR (Model 8400S, Shimadzu, Japan) over the wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm−1.22 (link) The zeta potential was measured using the particle size analyzer (Horiba Scientific Nanopartica SZ-100, Japan) by dispersing hydrochars in Milli-Q water with subsequent sonication.4 (link) The surface, texture and morphological characteristics of the samples were interpreted by scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI – Quanta 250, Czech Republic) at a high voltage of 8 kV with 10 000× magnification. The internal morphology of the hydrochar samples was studied using transmission electron microscope (TEM) (FEI – Quanta 250, Czech Republic) operating at 120 kV.23
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Particle Size and Zeta Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle size distribution was determined using a DLS analyzer, the nanoPartica SZ-100 (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) or the Zetasizer (Malvern Panalytical, Worcestershire, UK). The zeta potential of the particles was measured using the Zetasizer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanoparticle Size and Zeta Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The particle size distribution and zeta potential of nanoparticles were evaluated by dynamic light scattering in a Zetasizer (Nanopartica SZ-100, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) at 25 °C. Nanoparticles were dispersed in non-dissolving fluid, deionized water using ultrasonicator (Transonic T460/H, Elma, Germany) for 1 min before analysis to maintain the particles in suspension and to minimize the aggregation among the nanoparticles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cellulose Fibre Dimension Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fibre dimension of aqueous dispersed isolated cellulose fibre (distilled water) was measured by the dynamic light scattering instrument (DLS, nanoparticle analyser, HORIBA Scientific, nano partica SZ-100, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nanoparticle Size Analysis by DLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic mean diameter of the nanoparticles and their size distribution was determined by a dynamic light scattering (DLS)- nanoparticle size analyser, Nanopartica SZ-100 (Horiba Ltd, Kyoto, Japan). All measurements were performed in a wavelength of 633 nm at 25 °C with an angle detection of 90°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Zeta Potential Measurement Using Nanopartica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The zeta potential measurements were made using Nanopartica SZ-100 (Horiba Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) by applying the principle of Laser Doppler Electrophoresis. Lyophilised samples were diluted in deionised water and determined in triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Determining the pH Zero Point Charge of Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the pH zero point charge of the beads, pH drift equilibrium technique was employed. Ten conical flasks each containing 50 mL of 0.01 M NaCl was taken and the pH was adjusted from 1 to 10 using NaOH and H2SO4. A known quantity of composite beads was added to each flask and the flasks were equilibrated for 48 h. The final pH measured after 48 h was plotted against the initial pH and the intersection point was taken as pHzpc of the bead.27 (link) For zeta potential analysis, the solution was agitated for 2 h in a mechanical shaker before sonicating. After sonication, the solution was filtered using Whatman no. 42 filter paper and supernatant was collected and analysed for its surface charges in particle size analyser (Horiba Scientific Nanopartica SZ-100, Japan).28
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!