The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using agilent 6540 q tof

1

Evaluating Fatty Acid Oxidation Using 13C Tracing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the activity of FAO, cells were treated with vehicle control, etomoxir, scrambled siRNA, or CPT1A siRNA for 48–72 hours. Next, the medium was refreshed with new medium containing 100 μM uniformly 13C labeled (U-13C) palmitate-BSA and 100 μM natural abundance oleate-BSA. After labeling for 24 hours, cells were harvested, extracted, and analyzed as previously described [17 (link)]. For U-13C glucose, U-13C glutamine, and U-13C palmitate tracing experiments, cells were transferred to media containing 13C label and either vehicle control or 200 μM etomoxir for 12 hours, 6 hours, and 24 hours, respectively. The polar portion of the extract was separated by using a Luna aminopropyl column (3 μm, 150 mm × 1.0 mm I.D., Phenomenex) coupled to an Agilent 1260 capillary HPLC system. Mass spectrometry detection was carried out on an Agilent 6540 Q-TOF coupled with an ESI source operated in negative mode. Isotopic labeling was assessed comprehensively by using the X13CMS software [20 (link)]. The identity of each metabolite was confirmed by matching retention times and MS/MS fragmentation data to standard compounds. The isotopologue distribution patterns presented were obtained from manual evaluation of the data and calculated by normalizing the sum of all isotopologues to 100%. Data presented were corrected for natural abundance and isotope impurity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis of Acyl Meldrum's Acids and Enaminones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Commercially available reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich or Acros and used without further purification. Acyl Meldrum’s acids 9af and enaminones 10ad were prepared according to literature procedures; 9a, 9b, 9c, 9f44 (link), 9d, 9e45 (link), 10ad46 (link). Analytical thin layer chromatography was performed on aluminum sheets of UV 254 Merck silica gel, and flash chromatography using SilicaFlash P60 silica gel (40–63 µm). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with Bruker Avance III HD 400 MHz or Varian Gemini 500 MHz and NMR chemic al shifts were reported in δ (ppm) using residual solvent peaks as standards, with the coupling constant J measured in Hz. High resolution mass spectra were recorded with an Agilent 6540 Q TOF system High resolution (HRMS) was recorded on Agilent 6540 QTOF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Herbal Compound Separation and Identification by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC is a chromatographic technique for the separation of multicomponent samples that can process compounds of different molecular weights and polarities. It is widely used for the identification, separation, and purification of chemical components in herbal formulas [30 ]. The sample solutions were injected into the HPLC system (Agilent 6540 Q-TOF and Agilent 1290 UHPLC, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and separated using an ultrahigh performance-LC HSS T3 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 μm, Elite, DaLian, LiaoNing, CN). The mobile phase consisted of 100% ultrapure water, 0.1% methanol (a), and 100% acetonitrile (b). The gradient elution program was as follows: 2% B at 0–1 min, 2%–100% B at 1–55 min, 100% B at 55–60 min, and 100%–2% B at 60–61 min. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min, the injection volume was 10 μL, and the column temperature was maintained at 50°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Purified S. rubra Sr1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified products from S. rubra Sr1 were prepared at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL in methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Quentin-Fallavier, France). LC-MS/MS experiments were performed on a HPLC Ultimate 3000 system (Dionex, Voisins-le-Bretonneux, France) coupled with an Agilent 6540 Q-ToF (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) tandem mass spectrometer. LC separation was achieved with an Accucore RP-MS column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 µm, Thermo Scientific, Les Ulis, France) with a mobile phase consisting of water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B). Compounds were eluted at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min with a gradient from 5% B to 100% B in 25 min and then 100% B for 3 min. Injection volume was fixed at 5 µL for all the analyses. Mass spectra were recorded with an electrospray ion source in positive ion mode with the following parameters: spray voltage set at 3.5 kV, capillary temperature at 325 °C, capillary voltage at 45 V and fragmentor voltage at 120 V. The collision energy was optimized and fixed at 15 eV for all the MS/MS fragmentation acquisitions except that 30 eV was chosen for alkalized ions. Internal calibration was achieved with two calibrants (m/z 121.0509 and m/z 922.0098) providing a high mass accuracy of approximately 2 ppm. Mass resolution (FWHM, full width at half maximum) is 20,000 at m/z 922 in MS and MS/MS spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

LPS-induced inflammatory response in rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ordinary feed was purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). LPS was derived from Escherichia coli 055: B5 (batch number: 046M4045 V, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The rat single factor test kits, including interleukin (IL)-6 (A311125), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (A311129), and IL-12 p40 (B311169), were from QuantoBio (Beijing, China). The Quant-iTPicoGreends DNA assay kit was from Thermo Scientific (P11496, Waltham, MA, USA). The TruSeq Nano DNA LT Library Prep Kit was from Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA). Instruments such as the NE-C900 compression atomizer (OMRON, Kyoto, Japan), refrigerated centrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), Agilent 1290 UPLC (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), Agilent 6540 Q-TOF (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and microplate reader (FLx800, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Continuous Biological Nitrogen Removal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples from the two continuous AnSBRs were taken periodically for routine analysis. COD, MLSS, MLVSS, nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, TN, total iron, Fe3+ and Fe2+ were measured according to APHA (1995 ). The TOC and TN were determined with a TOC analyser (Shimadzu TOC-L, Japan).
During steady-states, samples from the two reactors were also collected for the characterization of the residual organics. The 3DEEM was determined using a fluorometer (HORIBA Jobin–Yvon FluoroMax-4, France). The organic species were analyzed using GC–MS (Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 SE, Japan with a HP5-MS column) and UHPLC-QTOF (Agilent 1290 UHPLC, Agilent 6540 QTOF, USA with Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 HD column). Detailed information about the analysis can be found in our previous study (Wu et al. 2016 (link)). The steady-states were considered to be achieved when the nitrate removal was stable for at least 2 weeks.
The theoretical COD amounts required for the removal of nitrate and nitrite were calculated based on the values of 2.86 and 1.71 gCOD/gNO2-N respectively (Medigue and Eddy 2002 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Postmortem Drug Analysis via UHPLC-QTOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Postmortem femoral blood samples were analyzed using the ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry system (UHPLC-QTOF; Aligent 1290 Infinity LC with Agilent 6540 QTOF, Agilent Technologies Sweden AB, Stockholm, Sweden) with standardized procedures previously described [19 (link)]. Briefly, samples were prepared via protein precipitation, the addition of three internal (amphetamine-d8, diazepam-d5, and mianserin-d3), and injected into the UHPLC-QTOF system. Separation was performed via a gradient elution on a C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm; Waters Acquity HSS T2 column, Waters Sverige AB, Stockholm, Sweden), followed by mass spectrometry (MS) acquisition in positive mode for a total run time of 12 min. Each analytical run included a blank whole blood sample, with internal standards, run at the beginning and end of each run. This method is a routine method for the analyses of medicines and drugs possible to be analyzed via UHPLC-QTOF in positive mode.
Mass spectra were processed using XCMS and CAMERA packages in R (v.4.1.2) for peak list generation and peak annotation, respectively. The parameters used for XCMS peak processing are included in Supplement Table S1, and the associated R code is included in Supplement File S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Palmitate Isotopes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A stock solution was made by dissolving 3.29 μmol of U-13C palmitate (Cambridge Isotopes) in 50.0 mL of LC-grade methanol (Sigma Aldrich) and stored at −20 °C in an LC-grade glass vial (Supelco). As an internal control, various aliquots of the stock solution were mixed with extraction solvents prior to sample introduction. Extracted samples were separated with a Luna aminopropyl column (3 μm, 150 × 1.0 mm I.D., Phenomenex) and analyzed by an Agilent 6540 QTOF as previously described (Mahieu et al. 2015 ). A hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography separation was used instead of a reversed-phase separation to minimize carry over. Absolute concentrations of palmitate were determined by calculating the ratio of the fully unlabeled peak of samples to the fully labeled peak of the internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Limited Proteolysis of EL_LovR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Limited proteolysis was carried out by mixing EL_LovR (390 µM = 5 mg/mL) with trypsin (w/w 1 trypsin: 90 EL_LovR) in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT. For experiments requiring Mg2+ and BeF3, 10 mM of MgCl2 and 5 mM/15 mM of BeCl2/NaF were added, respectively. After mixing EL_LovR and trypsin, 10 µL aliquots were taken at 1, 3, 6, 10 and 15 min timepoints and stopped with 4× SDS–PAGE sample buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 200 mM NaCl, 40 mM EDTA, 0.2% bromophenol blue, 10% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol, 4% (w/w) SDS, and 20% (v/v) glycerol) for gel electrophoresis analysis. For mass spectrometry analysis, EL_LovR was digested for 3 min and the reaction was stopped with 4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Molecular masses of resulting fragments were obtained by LC-MS with Agilent 6540 Q-TOF instrument (UT Southwestern Proteomics Core Facility).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Agilent 6540 Q-ToF Mass Spectrometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent 6540 Q-ToF (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) was used in its high resolution mode (M/ΔM > 40 000 [FHHM] at m/z 922). An electrospray ionization source was used in positive ion mode. Source parameters were set as follows: gas temperature set at 350°C, drying gas at 10 L/min, nebulizer pressure at 25 psi, capillary voltage at 3 500 V. An internal calibration was used (m/z 121.0509 and m/z 922.0098) to enable mass accuracies below 2 ppm.
For the MS mode, accessible mass ranged between m/z 100 and m/z 950 at an acquisition rate of 2 spectrum/s whereas, for MS/MS mode, the m/z range was optimized for each precursor ion and the acquisition rate was fixed at 1 spectrum/s. Collision energy was optimized for the lithium adducts of annonacin ( 1) and two values (60 and 80 eV with two successive injections) were selected in order to detect the major fragment ions which are structurally relevant but of low abundance. Each extracted ion chromatogram shown is obtained using an extraction of the theoretical m/z with a symmetric window width of ± 5 ppm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!