The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistical package for social science version 18

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics version 18 is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a range of statistical procedures for data management, analysis, and presentation. The core function of the software is to enable users to perform statistical analyses on data collected from various sources.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

37 protocols using statistical package for social science version 18

1

Dietary Intake Effects on Study Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was done to determine the normality of data. Differences in dietary intakes between treatment groups were detected with independent-sample t-tests. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the treatment effects on study outcomes after adjusting for confounding parameters including; age, and BMI. Significance of the treatment effects was presented as the mean differences with 95% confidence interval. Bootstrapping was also used as a sensitivity analysis of confidence interval. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were done using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Effects of Vitamin D on Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to control the normal distribution of variables. Independent sample t-test was used to establish changes in anthropometric measures and dietary intakes between the two groups. To determine the effects of vitamin D administration on inflammation and oxidative stress expression, we used independent sample t-test. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The data were considered statistically significant when p was <0.05. One-way ANOVA was performed to assess significant differences in all quantitative data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Continuous and Categorical Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results of continuous measurements were presented as mean ± SD and analyzed using Student's unpaired t-test. Results of categorical measurements were presented in number (%) and compared using χ2 test of significance. In the above tests, a P < 0.05 was accepted as indicating statistical significance. Data analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Science Version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft word and Excel were used to generate graphs and tables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Anthropometric and Dietary Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was done to determine the normality of data. To detect the differences in anthropometric measures, nutrient intakes and psychological parameters between treatment groups, we used independent-samples t-test. Multiple linear regression models were applied to determine treatment effects on study outcomes after adjusting for confounding parameters including; age, and BMI. The effect sizes were presented as the mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Differences in proportions were evaluated by Chi square test. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were done using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Vitamin D Supplementation and Metabolic Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the Kolmogrov-Smirnov test to examine the normal distribution of variables. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect differences in anthropometric characteristics and dietary intakes between the three groups. To determine the effects of vitamin D supplementation on metabolic profiles, we used ANOVA test. The changes across three groups were compared using Bonferoni post hoc pair-wise comparisons. To control the effect of confounders, we adjusted all analyses for baseline values, age and baseline BMI to avoid potential bias. These analyses were conducted by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using general linear models. We used Pearson correlations analysis to assess between changes of metabolic profiles and changes in the 25(OH)D3 concentrations. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were done using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ketamine Effects on Open Field Locomotion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) version 5.01.336 and Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The moving paths and travelled distances in the open field were tracked before and after ketamine injection. The measurement parameters were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc tests. Probability (p) values under 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synbiotic Supplementation Effects on Metabolic Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to determine the normality of data. Outcome log-transformation was used if model residual has non-normal distribution (hs-CRP, MDA, SHBG and FAI). To detect differences in anthropometric parameters as well as in macro- and micro-nutrient intakes between the two groups, we applied independent t-test. To assess the effects of synbiotic supplementation on metabolic parameters, we used one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Adjustment for changes in baseline values of biochemical parameters, age and baseline BMI was performed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were done using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Exploring Predictors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differences between the TACE group and the non‐TACE group in clinicopathological characteristics were tested using the Pearson chi‐squared test. The differences between patients with HMRE and with LMRE in adverse reactions related to pa‐TACE were tested using the Pearson chi‐square test or Fisher's probabilities test. The associations between microRNA‐4651 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed with nonconditional logistic regression using ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The effects of pa‐TACE treatment and microRNA‐4651 expression on hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis were evaluated using Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis models (with the log‐rank test) and Cox regression models (including univariate and multivariate models). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were used to determine the prognostic potential of clinicopathological variables (including pa‐TACE and microRNA‐4651 expression). All statistical tests were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Institute, Chicago, IL), and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Examining Metabolic and Psychological Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

p‐Values < .05 were considered statistically significant. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was done to assess the normality of data. Statistical analyses were done using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic variables. To detect the differences in anthropometric scales among two intervention groups, we used the independent‐samples Chi‐square and t‐test analyses. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine treatment effects on trial outcomes (psychological status and metabolic biomarkers) after adjusting for confounding variables. The effect sizes were presented as the mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!