The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Agilent 240 aa

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Agilent 240 AA is an atomic absorption spectrometer designed for the analysis of trace elements. It utilizes flame or graphite furnace techniques to determine the concentration of metals and metalloids in a variety of sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using agilent 240 aa

1

Ni(II) Adsorption by Carbon Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ni(ii) ions were adsorbed by the carbon nanotubes (typical adsorbent concentration of 0.1%) at room temperature (T = 298 K) in a pH range of 2.0–12.0 under mechanical shaking the reaction mixtures for designated period of time. The kinetic dependencies were measured during 360 h. The concentration of nickel ions before and after adsorption was determined in acetylene–air flame with an Agilent 240AA atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, US) operating at a wavelength of 429.0 nm and an optical gap width of 0.5 nm. The chosen conditions enable to determine the concentration of Ni(ii) ions in the range of 1–100 μg dm−3. The adsorbed amount was calculated from the material balance of Ni(ii) ions in solution before and after adsorption. The reproducibility of measurements was below 5%.
The changes of pH in the N-CNT suspensions containing NiCl2 solution were determined in the following way. To 10 cm3 of NiCl2 solution of concentration 29.3 mg dm−3 (5 mmol dm−3) with adjusted (by adding HCl or NaOH) pH values, 10 mg (9.9–10.1 mg) N-CNT was added. The suspension was shaking 30 minutes, then it was filtered, the equilibrium pH value was measured and the concentration of Ni(ii) ions in the supernatant was determined as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Elemental Releases during Degradation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Due to possible emission spectrum interferences between Ag and Mg, element releases (Ag and Mg) during degradation were quantified either via AAS (for Mg samples) or ICP-MS (for Mg–6Ag samples). Prior to AAS analysis, the supernatants were acidified with 1 % (w/v) nitric acid (HNO3, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and kept at 4 °C to avoid precipitation. Then, samples were diluted 1:250 in 1% HNO3 in ultrapure H2O, and total Mg concentration was detected using a flame AAS (Agilent 240 AA, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) at a wavelength of 285.2 nm (emission spectrum of Mg). A calibration curve ranging from 0.05 to 1 mg/L Mg was applied for quantification. ICP-MS was applied to quantify the concentration of Mg and Ag in the supernatant after Mg–6Ag degradation. To avoid contaminations, digiTUBEs (S-prep GmbH, Überlingen, Germany) were flushed twice with ultrapure water and 1% (w/v) HNO3 in ultrapure water. Supernatants acidified in 1% (w/v) HNO3 were diluted 1:1000–2000 in 1% (w/v) HNO3 in ultrapure water to a final volume of 30 mL in digiTUBES. The concentrations of Mg and Ag were determined by an inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (Agilent 7900 ICP-MS, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) with an ESI PFA microflow nebulizer (Elemental Scientific, Omaha, NE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Mg-10Gd Degradation with Liposomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An in vitro immersion test calculating the weight loss after 72 h immersion under cell culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2, 20% O2, humidified atmosphere) was performed as described in Nidadavolu [53 (link)] in order to determine the impact of liposomes on the degradation of the Mg-10Gd material. Material discs 1.5 mm in height and 1 cm in diameter were cleaned utilizing 20 min sonication in n-hexane (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 20 min sonication in acetone (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and 3 min sonication in 100% ethanol. Lastly, specimens were sterilized and dried in 70% ethanol under sterile conditions [54 (link),55 (link)].
The discs were placed in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) + 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum, PAA Laboratories, Linz, Austria): αMSH-SM-liposome (25:1 v:v), and in DMEM and DMEM 10% FCS: PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) (25:1 v:v). The Mg concentration released into the immersion medium was measured utilizing atomic absorption spectrometry (Agilent 240 AA, Agilent, CA, USA), as described [54 (link)]. The immersion assay was also performed with pure Mg using the same methodology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Leaf Iron Concentration Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf samples were washed with a regular dishwashing liquid, and rinsed with deionized water. The leaves were oven-dried at 70 °C for 70 h and then ground to obtain a fine powder. The samples were ashed in an electric furnace and analyzed for total Fe by atomic absorption spectrometry (Agilent 240 AA, Agilent Technologies, USA). The data were expressed as Fe concentration per dry mass of leaves and Fe content in leaves of the plants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!