The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Somatom sensation 4

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The Somatom Sensation 4 is a computed tomography (CT) scanner developed by Siemens. It is designed to capture high-quality images of the human body. The device utilizes advanced imaging technology to produce detailed scans that can be used for diagnostic purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using somatom sensation 4

1

Comparative Performance of CT Scanners

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four CT scanners including a 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigated in the present study. All CT scanners used in this study were manufactured by Siemens HealthCare (namely Somatom Sensation 4, Somatom Emotion 6, Somatom Emotion 16, and Somatom Sensation 64). The scanners’ specifications are presented in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CBCT and CT Imaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to the clinic’s routine, which are following the “ALARA” (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, either a CBCT or a CT was performed. Specifically, if both MTM were indicated for 3D imaging, a standard dental CT protocol was performed [26 (link)] (Somatom Sensation 4, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany; 80 mAs, 120 kV, slice thickness: 0.5 mm, FOV: 100–120 mm, table feed: 1 mm, convolution kernel: U70u), while in cases of a single MTM, a CBCT scan was recorded (3D Accuitomo XYZ Slice View Tomograph, J. Morita Mfg. Corp., Kyoto, Japan; FOV: 40 mm, slice thickness: 0.25 mm). Axial slices from the CT scans were transformed to orthoradial multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) using a semi-automatic line drawn within the center of the jaw by 2 radiologic technologists, who have both > 20 years of experience. The horizontal plane on sagittal MPR was tilted according to Down’s mandibular plane (a tangent through the gonial angle and the lowest point of the symphysis).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thoracic CT Angiography Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A thoracic CT scan was performed using a 4-detector multislice CT scanner (SOMATOM Sensation 4, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) by injecting contrast agents intravenously while the patient held her breath. Scanning began 20 seconds after the start of contrast material injection. The non-ionic contrast material (Ultravist 300, Schering, Berlin, Germany) at an average volume of 100 mL and concentration of 300 mg I/100 mL) was administered by a power injector at a rate of 3 mL/second via an 18-gauge plastic angiocatheter inserted into the cubital vein. Imaging parameters were 120 kV and 152 mA, with 0.5 second rotation time, 4×2 mm collimation, and 5 mm slice thickness. Data were transferred to a network computer workstation (Leonardo; Siemens Medical Systems, Germany) and diameters were measured using a window level of 400 HU, with the center at 60 HU. The widest diameter perpendicular to the long axis of the main pulmonary artery was measured with computer calipers at the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation by mediastinal window (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Thoracic Spine Imaging via CT Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired using a Siemens Somatom Sensation 4 multi-detector CT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). These images were originally intended for thoracic aortic and coronary artery calcium scoring, using ECG triggering set at 70–80% and 50% of the R-R interval, respectively. The scans were done sequentially in craniocaudal direction during suspended inspiration (standard scan setting: slice thickness; 2.5 mm, tube voltage; 140 kilo-voltage, tube-current-time-product; 50 milli-ampere-seconds and scan time 0.361 sec). In combination, these two series fully represented the thoracic spine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Temporal Bone Pyramid Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pyramid of the temporal bone was examined on a 4 slice Somatom Sensation 4 CT scanner (Siemens, Germany) and a 64 slice Somatom Definition AS CT scanner (Siemens, Germany) in axial projection with a tomographic layer thickness of 1 mm, a table advance step of 1 mm, a reconstruction increment of 1 mm (InnerEarSpi program Version A40, Siemens, Germany), a voltage of 120 kV, and a current of 70 mA. During visualization of the structures of the pyramid of the temporal bone, 2D images were used, both in the native axial planes and in the MPR reformation mode using a “bone” filter with a window width of 4000 μN and a window level of +700 μN. In addition, radiographic classifications of temporal bone anomalies were used [7 (link),8 (link),9 (link),10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Breast Radiotherapy Delineation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty patient data sets were retrospectively evaluated for this study. These patients previously underwent breast radiotherapy between April 2010 and May 2011. Patients were treated in the supine position (14 left sided and 16 right sided) after breast conservation surgery. Patients were selected consecutively until 30 cases were accrued. Approval for the study was granted by South Western Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee in August 2011, and the study was conducted from September 2011 to February 2012.
The treatment planning CT data sets were acquired on a Siemens Somatom Sensation 4 (Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany) with 0.25 cm slice thickness. Delineation of the breasts, heart, lungs and spinal cord was completed by a senior radiation therapist with Focal v4.40 (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and checked by a radiation oncologist. All delineation was completed according to the predetermined breast and heart delineation protocols.20 (link),21 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Coronary and Lumbar Spine CT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants underwent CT on a multidetector CT (MDCT) scanner (Somatom Sensation 4, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) [18 (link),19 (link)]. Thoracic CT imaging was obtained to assess coronary calcification (140 kVp, a reference exposure of 50 mAs, in-plane pixel size 0. 68 × 0.68 mm and slice thickness 2.5 mm, field of view (FOV): 35 cm) and included approximately vertebral levels T6–T10. The lumbar spine CT included vertebral levels L1–L2 (120 kVp, a reference exposure of 150 mAs, in-plane pixel size of 0.98 by 0.98 and slice thickness of 1.0 mm, FOV: 50 cm). In addition, lateral scout images were acquired, covering levels T6–L5. The scans were performed at the same visit and each subject was scanned with two hydroxyapatite phantoms (Image Analysis, Inc., Lexington, KY, USA), one placed in the lumbar region and the second one in the thorax region, to enable the scan data to be calibrated into equivalent mineral density (mg/cm3 of hydroxyapatite).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!