The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hiv uni form 2 plus o

Manufactured by bioMérieux
Sourced in France, Netherlands

The HIV Uni-Form II plus O is a laboratory equipment product designed for the detection and identification of HIV antibodies. It provides a standardized and automated testing procedure to aid in the diagnosis of HIV infection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using hiv uni form 2 plus o

1

Diagnostic Procedures for HIV and Hepatitis B

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All laboratory tests were conducted at the Botswana Harvard HIV reference laboratory (BHHRL) following manufacturer’s instructions. HIV and hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) were diagnosed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). HIV ELISA included a double/parallel testing algorithm with Vironostika HIV Uniform II plus O (BioMérieux France, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and Murex HIV-1.2.O (Biotech, Dartford, U.K.) as per manufacturer’s instructions. HBsAg ELISA was also carried out using the Murex HBsAg kit (Biotech, Dartford, U.K.). HBV DNA was quantified by use of COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® Taqman®, HBV Test v.2.0 (Roche diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Occult HBV infection (OBI) was defined as negative HBsAg with a detectable HBV viral load. TB was confirmed using either a positive sputum acid-fast bacillus or culture result or an abnormal chest radiology as previously described [20 (link)]. HIV viral load was measured using the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® AMPLICOR® HIV-1 MONITOR Test, version 1.5 (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ). CD4+ T-cell counts were measured on the BD FACScalibur platform (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Hematology tests were conducted on the Sysmex XE-2100 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). The COBAS INTEGRA 400 plus (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used for the measurement of chemistry panels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HIV Rapid Testing and Dried Blood Spot Surveillance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The blood collected for HIV rapid testing was also used to prepare dried blood spot cards for centralized HIV testing. The results of the centralized tests were used for surveillance purposes only and results were not returned to participants. We used a sequential testing algorithm with three immunoenzymatic assays (EIA), which detect anti-HIV antibodies. Screening for infection was conducted with Vironostika HIV Uniform II plus O (Biomerieux SA, France). Reactive samples were confirmed with Murex HIV 1.2.O (Murex Biotech Limited, Great Britain). Discordant results were retested using Genscreen HIV 1/2 Version 2 (Bio-Rad, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Serological Testing for HIV in Burkina Faso

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As part of the Burkina Faso DHS,21 dried blood spot samples (two to five per filter paper; Whatman 903 Protein Saver, Dassel, Germany) obtained by finger prick, were sent to the national blood transfusion centre in individual bags with dessicant and stored at −20 °C. Samples were punched into microtitration plates and analysed for HIV infection using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O, Biomérieux, France). The positive samples and 10% of the negative samples were checked using a recombinant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Enzygnost Anti-HIV 1/2 plus, Dade Behring Marburg GmbH, Germany). All discordant results were tested (InnoLia, Innogenetics, Belgium) once more to give a final result of 160 HIV-positive samples. HIV analysis exhausted a total of 491 samples, leaving 14 886 HIV-negative samples for hepatitis testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HIV Antibody Assay Validation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All specimens were fully characterised using standardised reference testing (gold
standard): two third-generation EIAs, plus WB for all EIA-reactive specimens. All
specimens with discordant EIA and WB results were excluded from the panel. Specimens with
indeterminate WB results were also excluded.
The two EIAs selected for this validation, namely, Vironostika® HIV
Uniform II Plus O (Biomerieux, France) and Genscreen® 1/2 Version 2
(Bio-Rad, USA), were both third-generation EIAs targeting both IgG and IgM of HIV-1 and
-2, plus type O antibodies using recombinant antigens covering all group M, HIV-1 subtypes
A-H. Both assays have been widely used throughout Africa12 (link),18 (link),19 (link),25 (link) and have consistently produced reliable data and detected HIV-specific
antibodies. An antibody-only test is the most appropriate for comparison with HIV
antibody-detecting rapid tests. The WB kit selected was New LAV-BLOT I (Bio-Rad). All
reference testing was conducted as per the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HIV and Syphilis Diagnostic Tests

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two ELISA tests, Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O (Biomerieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and Murex HIV-1.2.O (Diasorin S.P.A, Dartford, United Kingdom) were used in parallel to test for HIV infection at the Uganda Virus Research Institute IAVI-laboratory. The Western Blot (Genetic Systems, Bio-Rad Laboratories) was used as a tiebreaker if the ELISA results were discordant. Indeterminate Western Blot results not resolved by the time of this analysis were excluded. Samples screening positive for syphilis using the rapid plasma regain (RPR) test were subjected to a confirmatory treponema pallidum haemagglutination test (TPHA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Dried Blood Spot HIV Screening Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ELISA kit of Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O (BioMérieux, Netherlands) was used. First, 6-mm-sized DBS specimens were detached into coded 96-well microplate wells with a punch. To prevent inter-sample contamination, the used punch was swabbed with alcohol, burned, and then allowed to cool before processing the next DBS. Then, 200 µL of freshly prepared 0.5% Tween 20 in phosphate-buffered saline was added into each well. The microplate was covered and then incubated at 4°C for 48 h. The sample dilute (75 µL) was added into each well of the Elisa plate provided by the kit. Then, the DBS eluent was transferred into a microtiter plate using a pipette and 75 µL of the eluent was added to the corresponding well of the Elisa plate. Finally, the kit instructions were followed to perform HIV screening test. Each sample was tested thrice and signal to cut-off ratio (S/CO) data are presented as arithmetic means of the corresponding three S/CO values. External and internal quality controls were applied during the experiments. Control charts were mapped to ensure the testing quality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HIV Screening and Antiretroviral Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each participant was invited to supply a venous blood sample. Samples were collected in plasma preparation tubes and centrifuged. A screening test for HIV (GenscreenTM HIV1/2 version 2, Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) was performed on all plasma samples. For reactive samples, a confirmatory test was run (VironostikaTM, HIV Uni-Form II plus O, bioMérieux, Boxtel, Netherlands). If the sample reacted positively for both assays, a second confirmatory test was conducted (Murex HIV-1.2.O, Murex Biotech Ltd., Dartford, UK).
Plasma samples testing positive for HIV were also tested for the presence of the most common antiretroviral drugs (ARV) currently in use in South Africa (Lamivudine, Stavudine, Zidovudine, Nevirapine, Efavirenz, Ritonavir, Lopinavir, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir, Abacavir, Atazanavir) using ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry according to a slightly modified previously published method [17] . Plasma HIV-1 RNA load was determined by reverse-transcription PCR using an assay designed to detect
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
all M-group subtypes (Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test V1.5, Roche Diagnostic System Ins., Branchburg, New Jersey, USA) [18] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!