The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

66 protocols using prism ver 8

1

ADAMTS3 Correlation in Glioblastoma Subtypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analyses, Microsoft Excel, SPSS Ver.20, and GraphPad Prism Ver.8.0 were used. Statistical significance between and among groups were assessed by a two‐tailed t‐test and one‐way ANOVA, respectively, followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. In the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, the p‐Value <0.05 was indicated as statistically significant. The heat maps were created using GraphPad Prism Ver.8.0. Also, for correlation analysis, the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (R‐value) between ADAMTS3 and each GSC subtype marker was calculated using GraphPad Prism Ver.8 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Triplicates Data Analysis in Excel and Prism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were presented in tables using the Microsoft excel 365, figures were created using the Prism ver. 8. All experiments were carried out in triplicates, all data were reported with mean ± SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GraphPad (Prism Ver.8, GraphPad Prism Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to analyze statistical significance between groups. Experimental data were depicted as mean SD. Comparisons between two groups were analyzed by independent-samples t-test with Welch’s correction. And a p-value less than *p<0.05, **p<0.01 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The normality of the distributions of variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test.
Significant differences among groups were evaluated using unpaired
t-tests for normally distributed variables and the Mann–Whitney
U-test for non-normal variables (Prism ver. 8.10; GraphPad Software, La
Jolla, CA, USA). A mixed-model ANOVA (accounting for repeated measures), using time as a
fixed effect, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison method was used to determine
within-group differences. Significant differences were determined at a threshold of
P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ruminal pH Dynamics and Microarray Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH data were summarized 1 day before the sample collection to minimize the influence of opening the cannula stopper on the ruminal pH. The normality of the distributions of variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Significant differences in ruminal pH, duration of time where pH was <5.6 and 5.8, VFA components, lactic acid concentration, LPS activity, and peripheral LBP concentration among the early, middle, and late stages were evaluated using paired t-tests for normally distributed variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for non-normal variables (Prism ver. 8.10; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). The microarray data were analyzed using paired Student’s t-tests with the Benjamini–Hochberg FDR multiple testing correction (FDR corrected P < 0.05) and summarized using GeneSpring 12.0 (Agilent Technologies). Fold changes were calculated by comparing the middle and early (first period), late and middle (second period), and late and early (total period) stages. The PCA plot coordinates were calculated using the devtools package with microarray data in R ver. 3.3.2 (http://www.r-project.org; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Significant differences were determined with a threshold of P < 0.05, while trends that suggested possible significance were identified at 0.05 < P < 0.10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Neurotrauma-Induced NG2-Glia Neurogenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Figure 2: Summary of study characteristics.(A) Distribution of subject neurotraumatic injury types within studies indicats the percentage of studies that investigated spinal cord injury (SCI) or traumatic brain injury (TBI) as the main neurotraumatic lesion. (B) NG2-glia neurogenesis strategy: Studies were stratified according to how NG2-glia neurogenesis was attempted using either pharmacological agents, genetic modifications, or through the endogenous signaling of the injured central nervous system (CNS) indicates the percentage of studies using each methodological stratus to investigate NG2 neurogenesis in SCI or TBI animals. (C) Distribution of subject species within neurotraumatic injury types indicates the percentage of studies investigating in rats and mice, discriminating SCI or TBI as the main neurotraumatic lesion. (D) Distribution of subject sex within neurotraumatic injury types indicates the percentage of studies investigating female, male, and females as the subject sex, as well as studies where sex was not disclosed (unclear), discriminating SCI or TBI as the main neurotraumatic lesion. Created with GraphPad Prism ver. 8.2.1 for MacOS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality of data were assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test. Homogeneity of variance of datasets were assessed by the Bartlett test. Data with normal distribution was subjected to parametric Student's t-test (two-tailed), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. Data were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism Ver. 8.2.1 (San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analyzing Hemoglobin and Oxygen Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was conducted using commercial software (Prism ver. 8, GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). The hemoglobin concentration data, optical pathlengths, SO2, and age were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test. The effect size and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of difference were also used to confirm the findings. The gender ratio was checked by the chi-squared test. The correlation between the NIR-TRS data and the medication dosage was examined using Spearman correlation coefficients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Methamphetamine Consumption and Cognition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For MA consumption and behavioral assessments, ANOVAs were used to analyze differences between-subjects and within-subjects data using GraphPad’s Prism Ver. 8 (La Jolla, California). Correlations between MA consumption and working memory errors used Pearson correlations with 95% CIs. Western blot data was analyzed using between-subjects ANOVA analyses. Post-hoc comparisons used Bonferroni-corrected t-tests. Where noted, control data was used to normalize VOMA behavior and western blot data to a% of the average control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using Prism ver.8 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). We used parametric tests (Fig 2A–2D, Fig 3B and 3C, and S1C Fig) and nonparametric tests (Fig 4A, 4B and 4C and S3C and S3D Fig). See S1 Data for more details (for example, exact sample sizes and P-value).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!