The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using tenascin c

1

Histological Analysis of Cardiac Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hearts were extracted at various time points and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde before paraffin wax embedding. Tissue sections (5 μm) were stained as we described previously with Miller’s elastic van Gieson (MVG) stain (40 (link)) or with antibodies for tenascin-C (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-8694) (38 (link)). Composite tiled images were prepared from individual photomicrographs so that cross-sections through the whole heart could be observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoblotting Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoblotting (IB), whole cell lysates were prepared by scraping cells directly in 2x SDS sample buffer. Extracellular matrix was prepared as we previously described [2 (link)]. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST buffer then incubated with antibodies against IGFBP-5 (Gropep, Thebarton, SA, Australia), fibronectin, collagen 1A1, GAPDH, tenascin-C, nucleolin (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX), Histone H3 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or tubulin (Epitomics Inc, Burlingame, CA), washed with TBS three times, then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX). Signals were detected by chemiluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). Images were analyzed using Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysates were prepared by scraping cells directly in 2× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer. In parallel experiments, membrane proteins were extracted using the Subcellular Protein Fractionation kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) following the manufacturer's instructions. Extracellular matrix was prepared as we previously described.4 Proteins were separated by SDS‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris‐buffered saline (TBS)/0.05% Tween‐20 (TBST) buffer then incubated with antibodies against human IGFBP‐4, collagen, fibronectin, tenascin‐C, CTGF, GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX), phosphorylated SMAD2 and SMAD3, total SMAD2 and SMAD3, phosphorylated SMAD1/5/9, phosphorylated (p)‐44/42 MAPK, p‐AKT, p‐P38 kinase, p‐SAPK/JUNK, and antibodies targeting the corresponding total proteins (Cell Signaling Tech, Danvers, MA), CXCR4 and α‐SMA (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), His tag (Sigma), or tubulin (Epitomics Inc, Burlingame, CA), washed with TBS three times, and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase‐labeled secondary antibody (Santa Cruz). Signals were detected by chemiluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) on a FluorChem R system (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA). Images were analyzed using Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blotting of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PVDF membranes (Bio‐Rad) blotted with proteins from whole cell lysates were probed with antibodies against c‐Jun (1:1,000), JNK (1:1,000), p‐c‐Jun (Ser63) (1:500), p‐JNK (Thr183/Tyr185; 1:500, all from Cell Signaling), tenascin C (1:1,000, Santa Cruz), GAPDH (1:10,000, Sigma‐Aldrich), or tubulin (1:10,000, Sigma‐Aldrich). Following primary antibody incubation, membranes were washed and probed with anti‐mouse IgG‐HRP (1:10,000, Leica) or anti‐rabbit IgG‐HRP (1:10,000, Leica) and exposed to X‐ray films (Fujifilm) or imaged in a ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio‐Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

siRNA Transfection of HUASMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUASMCs were transfected with short interfering RNA directed against NFAT5 (5′‐CCA GTT CCT ACA ATG ATA A‐3′), tenascin‐C (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or ACTBL2 (Qiagen). As control, commercially available siGENOME Non‐Targeting siRNA (Thermo Scientific) was applied. For each well of a 6‐well plate, 3 μg of siRNA was diluted in Opti‐MEM I (Invitrogen) together with 3 μL of MATra‐si reagent (IBA) to give a final volume of 200 μL. After mixing and incubating for 20 minutes at ambient temperature, the solution was added onto the cells, which had been cultivated in 2 mL Opti‐MEM I prior to the transfection. Cells were then incubated on a magnetic plate (IBA) at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 15 minutes cells were washed and cultured in normal cell medium for a resting period of 48 hours for ACTBL2 and TNC or 72 hours for NFAT5 knockdown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Extraction and Analysis Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysates were prepared by scraping cells directly in 2x sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer. In parallel experiments, membrane proteins
were extracted using the Subcellular Protein Fractionation kit (Pierce
Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA) following the manufacturer’s
instructions. Extracellular matrix was prepared as we previously described
(4 (link)). Proteins were separated by SDS
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to PVDF membranes.
Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in Tris buffered saline
(TBS)/0.05% Tween-20 (TBST) buffer then incubated with antibodies against human
IGFBP-4, Collagen, Fibronectin, Tenascin-C, CTGF, GAPDH (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX,
USA), phosphorylated SMAD2 and SMAD3, total SMAD2 and SMAD3, phosphorylated
SMAD1/5/9, phosphorylated (p)-44/42 MAPK, p-AKT, p-P38 kinase, p-SAPK/JUNK and
antibodies targeting the corresponding total proteins (Cell Signaling Tech,
Danvers, MA, USA), CXCR4 and α-SMA (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), His tag
(Sigma, St Louis, MO) or Tubulin (Epitomics Inc, Burlingame, CA, USA), washed
with TBS three times, then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled
secondary antibody (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA). Signals were detected by
chemiluminescence (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) on a FluorChem R system
(ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA). Images were analyzed using Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Microscopy of ECM Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For fluorescence microscopy studies, cells were plated on eight-well slide glass and coverslips (75 × 25 mm 1, and 18 × 18 mm 0.16, Superior Marienfeld, Germany). The eight-well slide glass was washed with PBS, and cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS containing 0.1% triton X-100 and 0.1% BSA for 3 min at room temperature (RT). Primary antibodies, incubated with Tenascin-C, Fibronnectin, and TGF-β1 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) diluted in 1% BSA were kept overnight at 4°C. After several washes with PBS, the samples were incubated with fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500 for FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit, 1:200 for Alexa Fluor 488conjugated anti-rabbit, and 1:200 for green oregon-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulins) for 1 hr at RT and embedded in Vectahield with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Cells were visualized by an Olympus BX-60 microscope with the appropriate filters. A blue signal represents the nuclear DNA staining with DAPI. Finally, the slides were dehydrated and mounted. Image analysis was done using ImageJ software (http:// rsb.info.nih.gov/ij). Representative images were taken with a Spot 4.3 digital camera and software and edited in Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!